preview

Might, Not Right: Political Legitimacy in Taiwan Before 1750

analytical Essay
1610 words
1610 words
bookmark

Famously close to the Chinese mainland and centrally located in the heart of the southeastern seas, the tiny island of Taiwan became desirable only within the last few centuries as the global market expanded. Before the extension of international trade in the 16th and 17th centuries, Taiwan was inhabited by a number of linguistically distinct aboriginal peoples who are thought to have arrived some 70,000 years ago from Southeast Asia. Despite politically charged claims to the contrary, Chinese interest in the island was not kindled until Dutch occupation in 1621, which demonstrated a potential for profit in its resources and strategic location. When the imperial Chinese Qing dynasty acquired Taiwan from the descendants of the merchant pirate-lord who had ejected the Dutch from their colonial seat, they had little use for it. After considering and rejecting various policies, including quarantine, the Qing reluctantly pursued a colonization project of their own, hesitant to pour money into the tiny “ball of mud” off their eastern coast.

The Dutch and the Chinese interacted with the native population as their policies and representatives’ personalities dictated, but neither acknowledged the prior claim of the original inhabitants. These two colonial powers believed that the natives insufficiently utilized their land and natural resources. This enabled the colonizers to proclaim the lands empty and open to seizure, conveniently ignoring the aborigines who had made their home on the island for millennia under the doctrine of vacuum domicilium. The Dutch and the Chinese had superior military forces, considerable material resources, and powerful political structures to bolster their claims to Taiwan. However, simply possessing these ...

... middle of paper ...

...rd that has been revised for political gains.

Works Cited
1. Berkhofer, Robert. The White Man's Indian. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1978. 120.

Print.

2. Hsu, Madeline. "Island Frontier: Maritime Europe and China." History 364G. University

of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. 02 Feb 2010. Lecture.

3. Hsu, Madeline. "Quing Imperialism." History 364G. University of Texas at Austin,

Austin, TX. 09 Feb 2010. Lecture.

4. Stainton, Michael. "The Politics of Taiwan Aboriginal Origins." Taiwan: A New History.

Ed. Murray Rubinstein. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1999. Print.

5. Teng, Emma. Taiwan's Imagined Geography: Chinese Colonial Travel Writing and

Pictures, 1683-1895. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2006. 81. Print.

6. Tsai, Shih-Shan Henry. Maritime Taiwan: Historical Encounters with the East and the

West. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2009. Print.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that taiwan became desirable only within the last few centuries as the global market expanded. chinese interest in the island was not kindled until dutch occupation in 1621.
  • Explains that the dutch and the chinese interacted with the native population as their policies and representatives’ personalities dictated, but neither acknowledged the prior claim of the original inhabitants.
  • Explains that dutch rule in taiwan was established with a musket in one hand and the bible in the other.
  • Analyzes how the dutch shifted their focus from trade to the development of land and exportable goods. they did not consider the native peoples capable of engaging in sustained, intricate agricultural practices.
  • Explains that the franchise system was successful in extracting exportable trade goods from the aborigines and would be preserved under zheng chenggong and the qing.
  • Analyzes how ming loyalist zheng chenggong ejected the dutch from fort zeelandia and other colonial holdings in taiwan. the qing dynasty solidified their control of the southern mainland in 1683.
  • Explains that the qing administration on taiwan was perpetually understaffed and engaged in tax-farming, where the right to collect taxes from aboriginal villages was sold to the highest bidder.
  • Analyzes how michael stainton explores three of the more prominent origin theories and how they have been used to defend or attack the continued chinese presence on taiwan.
  • Argues that modern political implications of accepting the legitimacy of aboriginal claims do not have to be drastic.
  • Cites berkhofer, robert, hsu, madeline, and stainton, michael.
Get Access