Microsoft And Microsoft: Financial Analysis Of Microsoft

986 Words2 Pages

Microsoft was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and provides products, services, and devices in 190 countries around the world. They sell a wide variety of goods and services including laptop and desktop computers, video games and systems, applications for both phones and computers, and cell phones among other things. Their strategy is designed to allow them to accomplish three key goals: “reinvent productivity and business processes”, “build the intelligent cloud platform”, and “create more personal computing” (Microsoft Form 10-K). The main competitor for Microsoft today is Apple, who competes with Microsoft with its own line of laptops, cloud services, and phones. All of these devices use Apple operating systems and software which are direct …show more content…

This ratio shows Microsoft has a slight edge over Apple as it shows Microsoft has greater ability to meet its current obligations given its current assets. Both firms, however, would be able to meet their outstanding current liabilities if needed by liquidating their current assets, as evidenced by a current ratio of greater than 1. From a risk perspective, Microsoft has little to worry about as far as default risk goes as it can easily meet its debt payments with its current assets. The next relevant financial ratio to consider is the debt-to-equity ratio of each company. Microsoft has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.69 and Apple has a ratio of 1.51. This means that Microsoft finances using more slightly more debt relative to Apple, whereas Apple uses slightly more equity. The “leverage” of a company is important because the more debt a company carries, the greater its interest payments are and the greater the chance of default risk and bankruptcy if the firm cannot meet these payments. Another good way to look at these numbers it to state the debt as a percentage of total funding (liabilities plus equity). This shows that …show more content…

Cyber-attacks and security is the biggest risk as losses from this could be catastrophic (Exhibit 1), and these attacks are much more common occurrences today (Exhibit 2). As an article from the NY Times states, it is wise to transfer these risks through cyberattack insurance as a company like Microsoft cannot entirely avoid this risk. It is difficult and costly to insure all of this risk, especially for a firm as big as Microsoft, so Microsoft should transfer as much as they reasonably can and seek to control loss for the rest through extensive cyber-security measures (Perlroth and Harris). The next risk for the firm is failed projects. With Microsoft being as innovative as it is, there are many projects it takes on, and these projects can make a lot of money or lose a lot of money for the firm. It is obviously important to avoid these projects that will cost the firm a lot in revenue through thorough project analysis. It is impossible, however, to avoid all projects, so Microsoft must retain and control loss on the projects that begin to fail by keeping the option to abandon a project or salvage the invested assets for another project. The third risk is disclosure of personal data. This is a huge issue for any company utilizing storage in the cloud. It can cause huge losses as customers whose

More about Microsoft And Microsoft: Financial Analysis Of Microsoft

Open Document