Michigan Court Case: Charles Toussaint vs BlueCross Blued Shiled

2165 Words5 Pages

In 1980, a precedent was set in a Michigan court case involving a man named Charles Toussaint who was suing his employer, BlueCross Blue Shield, for wrongful termination based on the guidelines set in the employee manual (Alfred and Bertsche 33). The manual stated that employees would only be terminated for just cause, and the court decided that Blue Cross had violated the agreements in the employee manual (34). The court also ruled that even with Blue Cross’s efforts to provide a document that “issued non-binding guidelines” the employee manual was a contract and Toussiant was wrongfully terminated (34). After the precedent set by this case many employers and employees for that matter were reviewing their employee manuals for the type of ambiguous language that could allow them to get sued or sue. Consequently, a slew of wrongful termination lawsuits followed this one, which is why it is now important for employers to draft their manuals with experienced legal staff. Even with the best legal team and the perfect wording there is still no definite assurance that an employer will be completely protected from such lawsuits, but taking these preventive measures helps in the long run.
Employee manuals are an important document for employees and employers alike. This document provides the fundamental information that a company may wish to convey to its new employees and as a refresher for old employees. It is a general rule that all businesses with fifteen or more full-time or part-time employees should have an employee manual (Pestronk). Once a business has fulfilled the minimum requirement of fifteen employees “it becomes subject to the equal-employment opportunity provisions of the federal civil rights laws,” and consequently th...

... middle of paper ...

...loyees that are under contracts as per their employment status, it could be suggested that Gentilly Physical Therapy, Inc. create a section dedicated to professional licensed contract workers. The addition of this section will help the company cover themselves in the event of a lawsuit by outlining the specific guidelines for these types of employees.
Because the employee manual for Gentilly Physical Therapy is all inclusive and well written except for a few minor issues, it does not need many revisions. However, it does appear to have been written some time ago and could use some minor updating to reflect some of the current issues like technology and social media use during work hours. But as a past employee of Gentilly Physical Therapy, Inc. and knowing the business as I do, I do not think these updates are urgent while they do need to be addressed eventually.

Open Document