preview

Michel Foucault Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
For Michel
Foucault, it is important to be aware of the relation between the author and text. Moreover, it is important to know about author figure. Foucault asks “What
does
it
matter
who
is
speaking?” accordingly and his question conveys the main
ethical
principles
of
écriture-meaning
for instant
writings. There are several rules for instant writings; therefore, Foucault splits his assumption into two categories. The first category is related with designing that he believes writing should be “freed” from the need to “express” and should able to agent for only its own self which refers to writing expands in a similar ways that it conflicts its own concepts of rules, then it vanishes during the establishment of space upon writing. His second category is related with connection between the writers and their death which means that for him the concept of the author is a component of a historical continuum. It is important to know about the idea of that authorship is flexible because the texts we read take on shapes by readers in communities differently. Foucault argues about the concept of writing, which is called –simply ‘écriture’- , that writing is not interested in its aesthetic and intimations. Basically, écriture remains in transcendental custom that it helps to open more gates for authors in writing.
Michel Foucault’s objective is to demonstrate that the authors keep going to achieve a few crucial roles despite their declared death. At that moment, Foucault cannot take his eyes from the author functions. There are four author functions according to him. To begin with, first one is related to both objects of appropriations and shapes of properties. This refers to the idea of ownership of works and the idea of copyright rules. ...

... middle of paper ...

...Foucault’s writing about Karl
Marx
and
Sigmund Freud kept my attention because these philosophers differ from each other. For example, Sigmund Freud brought probabilities
and
constructions
of
other
texts. On the other hand; Karl Marx believes that one author is no
more
than
the
author
of
his
own
work. They are both founders of the discursivity. For example Sigmund Freud believes that the distinctions are derived from psychoanalytical approach. Both philosophers’ discourses are practicable to the other fields; however, it is not say to make a novel practicable for another discourse that in short we cannot make such a thing to apply. At that issue, Michel Foucault points out that the awareness of the discourse is not identical but they are specific to the culture so they alters accordingly to the cultures and each community has its own comprehension of the discourse.
Get Access