Mexico is one of the most populated and industrialized of the third world nations, yet it remains very impoverished in comparison to it’s northern neighbor. Recently Mexico has been the third largest trading partner of the United States, has become an important exporter of petroleum and plays a pivotal role in the politics of the region. Yet Mexico is frequently treated with neglect and misunderstanding by the United States. This treatment is why Mexico is hesitant about United States influence and investment in Mexico. While many foreign countries acknowledge the United States as a protectorate and a blessing, Mexico sees the United States as a problematic source. The idea of the United States overshadowing Mexico was best stated in Pofirio Diaz’s famous quote. From the Pofiriato up until today Mexico is still in the shadows of the United States; but with the creation of NAFTA the intentional distance between the United States and Mexico has begun to close.
US immigration is a historical reoccurring phenomenon that is situated upon the exploitation of workers to bring economic prosperity to the country. Immigration is the backbone aspect to the success of the US as large influxes of immigrants are imported to work in physical demanding job sectors. There are comparable feelings of alienation of Mexicans and many views that express the feelings that illegal immigrants should return to their homelands. By examining the laws, policies, and structural forces that bring migrants to the United States, we can see the extent to which immigration is closely related to our position in the global economy and how a group of leftist armed activists dare to disrupt the globalization tactics of capitalism, neo-liberalism, and a hegemonic government. On a closer examination, you find that many of the economic challenges Mexico faces are directly linked to policies that have been supported by the United States, U.S multinational corporations, or institutions supported by the United States. This group of campesinos in the southern state of Chiapas in Mexico, reject, refuse, and remodeled a new autonomous world that seeks to “work within worlds”, free from the political, economic, and social constructions of the Mexican government. It opposes the liberal economic policies Mexican presidents have pursued since 1982. While its revolutionary project is rooted in the injustices suffered by the indigenous population of eastern Chiapas, the Ejercito Zapatista de Liberacion Nacional questions globalization and calls for the reorientation of Mexican economic policy along traditional socialist lines and the transfer of political power from elites to the mass of poor Mexicans.
Smith, Geri and Reed, Stanley. “Mexico: A Rough Road Back.” Business Week. November 13, 1995: p. 104 - 107.
De Cordoba, José & Lunhow, David. “The Perilous State of Mexico.” The Wall Street Journal. Dow
... consist with the success of Mexico’s growing “GDP” thanks to NAFTA. By creating NAFTA, North America is able to not just compete in the global market but also be the supreme leader. NAFTA rules the trade of good’s and services in an international scale, with over 1.1 trillion in goods and services being traded in North America alone. NAFTA has made world markets compete at a higher level to eventually eliminate all Tariffs on a global scale for all Corporations to trade freely. The creator’s of NAFTA understood the fundamental realities, that Corporations do not have borders or belong to a single country. Corporations live and breathe without the common knowledge of patriotism. Corporations live in a “New Economic World Order”. Thanks to NAFTA the blueprint has been drawn to begin a massive change in the way the world will conduct business in the near future.
The United States has no more important foreign relation ship than that of which it enjoys with Mexico, and vice versa. These two countries share interwoven societies and economies. Although there have been disagreements and turbulence between the two countries, which partnership is without these? The Strength of each country’s democracy is fundamental to the other’s. This relationship that the two countries share directly affects that lives of millions of Mexican and United States citizens everyday. Recently these two countries have become even more unified than ever before. Tackling issues such as Border Control, Countering Narcotics, Dealing with multiple Law enforcement agencies, Human Rights laws, trade and development, etc. There are many issues that they are mutually interested in and must deal with. Yet, there are some vast differences in which these two countries are run. There are also many similarities, which we must take into account. Both Democratic Governments have similar structures, containing a legislative, judicial, and executive branch. Yet, these structures are very different internally, containing specific duties that the other country’s branch may not have.
Mexico’s economy is undergoing a stunning transformation. Seven years after the launch of the North American Free Trade Agreement, it is fast becoming an industrial power. Free trade with the U.S. and Canada is turning the country from a mere assembler of cheap, low-quality goods into a reliable exporter of sophisticated products from auto breaks to laptops computers. Although Mexico has seen economic growth lately, it still faces tremendous problems in the aftermath of the 1995 recession and the revolution that took place in the Chiapas which still wages on today. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects that NAFTA has had on the economy and it’s people during the implementation of NAFTA and in what NAFTA will bring in the future.
Throughout its history Mexico has had many revolutions. The most famous perhaps is the Mexican Revolution from 1910-1920. The people of Mexico were getting tired of the dictator rule of President Porfino Diaz. People of all classes were fighting in the revolution. The middle and upper classes were dissatisfied with the President’s ways. The lower and working class people had many factors such as poor working conditions, inflation, inferior housing, low wages, and deficient social services. Within the classes everyone was fighting; men, women, and children all contributed to the fight for freedom from Diaz (Baxman 2). This revolution proved to be the rise and fall of many leaders.
The United Mexican States, more commonly known as Mexico, is a federal republic in North America. It is bordered by United States of America to the north, Guatemala, Belize and Caribbean Sea to the south. Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Americas, and the major ethnicity is Mestizo. Mexico is federation with thirty one states joined. In pre-Columbian Mexico, many cultures have advanced into civilizations like Olmec, Toltec and Teotihuacan, Aztec and more. In 1521, Spanish colonized the Mexican territory, which was controlled as the Viceroyalty of New Spain. In 1821, Mexico earned their independence, and nations recognized their independence. However, Mexico had to face some difficulties after the independence, especially after the Mexican-American War that led to territorial friction with United States of America, Franco-Mexican War, a civil war, and domestic dictatorship. In 1910, the Mexican Revolution occurred, which made their government to change their Constitution, and their political system. In 2008, Mexico’s economy was hit hard by credit crunch. However, their economy has recovered since then, especially with helps from foreign companies pouring money for investment. Now, Mexico has one of the largest economies in world. Mexico is the tenth largest oil producer in world, and also the largest silver producer in world. Mexico is counted as one of the newly industrialized country and an emerging power. By 2050, Mexico is expected to have world’s fifth largest economy, according to Goldman Sachs. They have the fourteenth largest nominal GDP and tenth largest GDP by purchasing power parity. Mexico’s economy is strongly linked with North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) partners, which includes Canada and United ...
...TA" in Alan Rugman, 1994. Foreign Investment in NAFTA. Columbia SC. University of South Carolina Press