The film ‘Saving Private Ryan’ is a Steven Spielberg film released in 1998 which aimed to make a both shocking and effective portrayal of warfare. The film shows realistically the severities and horror of warfare. Spielberg admitted that he was ‘looking for realism the whole time’. A conventional war film aims to show fearless soldiers and frightened or brutal enemies. Spielberg wanted to show fear from both sides and highlight the terror felt by young men. I feel it is easy to become detached from the fact that many soldiers were young men with individual lives and varying views. The film uses de-saturated colour so that the audience feels the film is older. The effect of de-saturated colour allows audiences to feel that they have also taken the step back in time along with Private Ryan. Another effect is the use of handheld cameras which allows the audience to feel they are in the battle and moving up the beach or across ground. Spielberg saw the opportunity to use D-day as an opening scene. Not only would D-day be an action packed opening scene it would also show its many brutalities. This scene is the film’s selling point and almost trademark. Finally the film shows how ordinary men find themselves fighting on the frontline.
When the film starts the American flag is flying and music is played. Violins, trumpets and bugles can be heard playing. We see an elderly man walking ahead of his family down a path. Quickly it is made clear that the path is located in a mass graveyard. As he walks past the graves the number of dead becomes apparent. One of the graves is the Star of David showing how not only Christians fought this battle. After seeing the immaculate graves the camera faces the elderly man. The elderly man falls to the ...
... middle of paper ...
...this really portrays the realism of war. Overall the use of de-saturated film and handheld cameras is an effective way of portraying the film. It does not only portray the film but also realistically portrays war. Scenes which are sometimes horrific or disturbing to watch give us a tiny insight in to the horrific scenes of war. I feel this is the most realistic war film without actually being there. Spielberg successfully took this film to new levels with not always showing brave and noble men. Spielberg has reached the limits of modern film with his effects and constant persistence to find realistic effects. The opening scene is like a starter of a meal or a taste of what is about to come. It shows how these men are brave but scared. I think the film portrays the diversities of emotions experienced by the men. Overall I think this is a realistic and effective film.
Since the movie is based on a true story, there aren’t very many parts that happen in the movie that never happened. The movie is extremely accurate in its portrayal of the military emotionally hardened father.
In its best moments, the movie is a strong, anti-war documentary. It has truly moving moments of bereaved loved ones, mangled bodies in the streets, incredulous soldiers in Iraq, angry Iraqis and innocent teenagers being manipulated into enlisting. In this way, the movie presents a version of the war on Iraq that isn't shown much in the media. It improves our understanding of the war by giving it a human face.
I felt an instant connection with it, as O’ Sullivan must have felt standing there upon the sea of bodies. The composition of this photo tells a story all on its own. From the way he captured the body laying twisted in the front, capturing the expressions on his face, to the way the soldiers on the horses blend into the background. The photo speaks death, not because we can see death but because of the composition, the way film captured “fog” or “dust clouds” to the color of the capture itself. There was a story to be told and O’ Sullivan told it with seeing what others couldn’t see, by shooting lower to the ground and giving the forefront the effect of being bigger than the background and capturing the lone soldier amongst the rest of the bodies that looked to be reaching towards O’
Analysis of the Methods Used to Make the Opening Battle Sequence of Saving Private Ryan Shocking and Realistic
GIs. He uses a close up shot when, he zooms in into a man's eye and
The brass reasoned that an experienced infantryman is a terrified infantryman. The odds of dying in the early waves were so great that an informed soldier might be paralyzed with well-founded despair. But the young and idealistic might move forward into the lottery of death. Director Steven Spielberg made 'Saving Private Ryan' as a tribute to D-day veterans. He wanted, reviewers say, to strip the glory away from war and show the '90s generation what it was really like.
Presented with realistic and brutal carnage, conveyed through sympathetic and recognizable characters, Saving Private Ryan reminds modern audiences that war is something that should never be forgotten and how drastically it can change lives, on and off the battlefield. Like Private Ryan, Americans are expected to live their lives the best that they can, remembering that they earned the freedom to live thanks to the bravery and courage of thousands of combat soldiers who fought on the front
The film plot is very novel and interesting which the film focus on aftermath of the Gallipoli Anzac war which tells the story of a father’s determination track down each one of his presumably deceased three sons who served in the Gallipoli as Australian soldiers in the war. In order to bury all of them at home which is a unique plot. The film came as an essential mix of tactical Hollywood elements and an accurate respectable portrayal of both the Turkish army and culture. Audience would find this newly released film as a blast from the past as its touchdown as more of an experimental film between sides of war stories and leaves the viewer to observe the characters carefully. It’s an important element that combines some powerful Hollywood emotional scenes that make up for a very enjoyable and extraordinary viewing experience. However some scenes in the film the Australian soldiers express regret in relation to the Gallipoli war, the film cast some interesting mysteries to the viewer as to think why the soldiers were in the Gallipoli? And what they achieved? The whole aim on what is to achieve? Which is very interesting as to analyse all these films the question “what have we achieved “in the war? Was it just the deaths’ of countless Australian’s, Vietnamese, Japanese, Turkish soldiers? Film is a medium
My conclusion of the opening battle scene is that the scene is very graphic, and is showing that the violence of that battle and how many lives were lost was also happening in real life back in World War II. I enjoyed watching the opening scene and would recommend it to people my own age so they can see for themselves what war was like.
The scene must firstly be set by ascertaining the mood of the people upon the outbreak of war, and this Bourne eloquently describes:
The disregard for human life being shown through the D-Day scene as people shoot and kill each other. Through the portrayal of the lives in the 2nd Battalion and Captain Miller the film reminds us how ghastly and how horrifying war actually was. Shows how dehumanising war was. It shows us how war doesn't care about anything. War is discriminant. It doesn’t care who you are, your characteristics, your past, your purpose, war will discriminate you some way. In ways that humans cannot. This is simply eye-opening. Saving Private Ryan is a compelling drama which is based around the events that occurred in the Mission. This mission was to find Private Ryan and to send him home. This is a film that challenges us to second guess ourselves in order to have a different perspective on war. It challenges us to believe the impossible, and to challenge the possible. To challenge what we believe what may seem to be the most simplest of tasks, but when put into our hands… Life can ‘stuff’ you
Even though Ryan’s book accurately describes many of the things that happened on D-day, he doesn’t describe many of the situations well. The majority of his descriptions are minimal and are not that vivid. When it comes to describing scenes that would be visually amazing, he is very brief and factual. When he describes the scores of paratroopers sent into France, he simply states that “882 planes carrying thirteen thousand men” were sent in. He doesn’t help the reader in visualizing just how that many planes looked in the sky, as well as what it looks like to see hundreds of paratroopers drifting to the ground. The film accomplishes this very well, with visuals that strived to strike awe in the viewer. When the planes fly into France, the viewer is shown hundreds upon hundreds of planes flying in the same formation at many different altitudes. To actually see all those planes was incredible, most people haven’t seen something that stunning in real life, or in a film. The same goes for when the paratroopers actually jump out of their planes. Ryan just states that there were “thirteen thousand men” sent to jump, but to show you a few hundred paratroopers has a different effect on a person. Gerd Oswald and the cinematographers did an amazing job in sho...
War entails many different components, but what this essay will focus on is on the experience of the soldier and how this has changed through the course of history. I will use three war films that focus on three different wars settings : A Very Long Engagement (World War I), Saving Private Ryan (World War II) and Black Hawk Down (Somalia). I will argue how these films illustrate how the experience of the soldier has not changed overtime by focusing on the shared combination of fear and courage soldiers face. There are some weaknesses to the argument that will also be addressed. For example, some aspects of the soldier’s experience has changed like the types of enemies they fight but I will present why the argument of a soldier’s experience remaining constant is stronger.
Terrence Malick’s 1998 film The Thin Red Line utilizes several stylistic devices. This Sergeant Keck’s death by grenade sequence, starting at 57:32 and ending at 58:32. The highly subjective action in this scene is illustrated through the strategic use of shot scale, sonic point of view, and both diegetic and non-diegetic sound design. By using these stylistic devices in tandem, Malick successfully guides the audience on an emotional journey of soldiers in combat.
Due to the film’s quality and interest it became an award winning film. The film had excellent sound effects such as the battle scenes. The image quality was also outstanding; it used many different angles to depict the actor to make you feel involved in the scenes. In the action scenes the most common viewpoint used was a close up shot which allows the audience to see and feel the intensity of the scene. The second viewpoint mostly used was a tracking shot due to the actors c...