What is your opinion of a merger? If you say and think a merger is a bad thing then you are not alone. Recently, “mergers were given a big thumbs down in a poll given to Americans and Canadians.” The definition of a merger is “a combination of two or more businesses to form a single firm.” The cons of mergers greatly outnumber the pros because as companies get larger and larger, people lose jobs, monopolies form, and consumers pay higher prices, resulting in a less competitive and, therefore, less opportune business market.
Is bigger really better? Big might be sometimes better, but companies, corporations and monopolies can get too big. “Some merged companies become so huge that they lose focus, gain overhead and increase their expenses dramatically. Ultimately they can be less innovative and competitive than before.” Big companies tend to care only for making money and devalue things such as the quality of the product they produce. “Smaller companies by contrast, can hold some clear advantages. They are leaner, more focused and nimble than giants and relatively speaking, the can be more profitable.” Smaller companies, I believe, are out to make a living and care for the consumer’s satisfaction more then just the money they will receive. They know that if they don’t produce well and make people happy then they will go out of business or bought out by a bigger company.
Mergers aren’t what I would call the most successful thing in the world either. Lots of mergers don’t last very long or don’t succeed. This past year we had quite a few merger failures. Here are the top 10 Biggest Merger and Acquisition Bloopers of 1999, announced by leading merger consultants.
1. AOL and Netscape
2. Excite
3. Disney and Infoseek
4. BNP and Bank Paribas
5. Tyco International Ltd. and Binge/Purge
6. Deutsche Telecom and Trouble on the Line
7. American Home Products and Warner Lambert
8. Aetna US Healthcare
9. AutoNation
10. Bank One
These companies all failed for many reasons. The Disney and Infoseek merger failed for the simple fact that the “managers of Infoseek could not get along with Disney.” As these managers quit, the company shares plummeted by 60%. Next we have the BNP and Bank Paribas merger. This merger failed because “BNP wanted to open equity markets in Europe, and Bank Paribas didn’t.” Half of the equity analysts have left the company and more senior-level mana...
... middle of paper ...
...ew words about mergers with us. He says that “families are torn apart by moving to new jobs in other places, people suffer from a loss of financial support, and jobs, and there is no compensation or care for the employees that it affects.” He also talked about the business aspect. Consumers suffer from “higher prices for gas in the long run, due to a loss of competition, and price fixing.” He shared a great deal with us and had some great points.
After it is all said and done, many companies have failed because of the affect of mergers. It is as clear as glass the damage and effect that mergers have on our economy and us, the consumers. Our economy suffers from the power that large corporate companies possess and use to economically squeeze the life out of us. Big businesses have had a large influence on our government and our on our community. Our capitalistic economy depends on business, but we need to be careful about mergers and so that they take over our society. Other people who share negative ideas of mergers are Mark N. Clemente, David S. Greenspan, Peter Troiano, and Michael Lord. I brought their ideas here for you…so…are mergers a bad thing?
fail (Cheng, 2012). Mergers and acquisitions are much common in these days and only a few of them are end up in successes. Even though mergers and acquisitions are not result much successes rate, many organizations are still preferring it because, it is used as a cooperative strategy but nowadays it is used for cooperative development. The cultural differences and merger integration can be considered as an important factor for the failure rate but this study mainly focused
Both the CEO of Exxon, Lee Raymond, and the CEO of Mobil, Lucio Noto, announced that it is because of this reduction in prices and downsizing within the oil industry that the merger is taking place, the very nature of the oil industry was becoming increasingly competitive. The oil industry as whole was becoming more efficient, causing oil prices to fallr. Firms can only maintain their prices equal to or above marginal cost, and if prices are lower than marginal...
The merger was the crowning achievement of Marcus Loew, a self-made business tycoon (Hay 10). Marcus Loew, born Max Loew, was born in New York to Australian-Jewish Immigrants. Loew grew up in poverty and had dropped out of school at the age of 9 to help support his family (Edwards para 1). He was a very ambitious child. He was uneducated but he worked his way up from meaningless jobs to high paid business man through real estate investments (Edwards para 2). He started at a meager job at a fur busi...
Amela Kamenica wishes she could “stay there, watching the war, rather than be here safe, but without friends” (Brice 25). She wants to go back country, where she won’t be lonely. Shows how unhappy she is in her new home since she rather go back where her life could possibly threaten in the hazardous war. Ha, emotional feels, “fire, sourness, weight, anger, loneliness, confusion, embarrassment, and shame” (Lai 207-208) These powerful emotions all of a sudden overwhelm her. Primarily, Ha doesn’t fit in with her classmate and is treated like an outcast. Like many refugees when they enter a foreign country, they many not always be accepted by their peers. Furthermore, their lives turn “inside out” when they are rejected by their peers and feel sad that they are treated like an outsider. Ha wants to “choose wartime in Saigon over peacetime in Alabama” (Lai 195) Ha would want to stay in a dangerous place, where there are bombs and a possible chance of you dying than being in a calm place like Alabama. Home is like your comfort zone, and where you can relax and relate to people in your home town and feel like an insider. Because Ha doesn’t get the home/welcoming feeling in Alabama she decides she wants to go home. To conclude, Ha and Amela lives turn “inside out” when they want to go back home where it is dangerous, however, home has familiar faces.
The purpose of this paper is to attempt to recompile information about the merger of two corporations; one of many taking places i...
However, recovery is based on core aspects such as hope and meaning whereby an individual tries to overcome discrimination, stigma and trauma attributed to the diagnosis of a mental illness. Also, it requires a person to assume the control over his or her life and empowered to make his or her own decision in full engagement. There are two types of recovery, i.e. clinical recovery and personal recovery. Therefore, it is vital for an individual to have a clear understanding of the two as well as identify the differences since recovery is considered to have a medical meaning. According to Rethinks, clinical recovery is a treatment outcome emerged from the designated experts of mental health professionals which encompasses the restoration of social functioning and getting rid of symptoms, hence making an individual to get back to normal. (Unger,
Firstly, the need for achievement is met by understanding that people strive to master difficult situations, endeavors or challenges. This idea works on both an organizational level, as well as an individual level. From an organizational level, it is well known that a merger of this magnitude had never been attempted. With that brings a great challenge to succeed, and lets the leadership work in new and innovative ways to make such a merger successful. McClelland’s theory states, in regards to need for achievement, that people strive “To excel one’s self…to rival and surpass others… to increase self-regard by the successful exercise of talent” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010, p. 215). By this definition, the merger would motivate leadership to excel in the face of a challenge, and to increase their professional self-regard in their success in doing so. On an individual level, you are asking the performers and employees to recognize both economic and social climates, and to come together in action to save both their careers, as well as their passion in life. Such a merger would only embolden self-worth and perceived achievement, because they would be part of a much larger organization more adverse to risk and future change, and they would easily be able to look at other similar organizations and realize they were part of an organization who accomplished something never before attempted.
As the business, people put it, to maximize the wealth of shareholders (Peavler, 2016). This could be done by pursuing more of an immediate reason that will realize the shareholders wealth maximization goal. However, this main reason may fail to be realized as most mergers depict negative results.
My desire to go to dental school began to develop in my mid-teens while working at Plainview Oral and Maxillofacial Associates(Plainview Oral). Not only was I fortunate enough to obtain a position there as a young teenager, but since starting over six years ago, I have been mentored by Dr. Bass, a recognized oral surgeon. Under his guidance, I developed a strong appreciation for the skills required to be a successful dentist, as well as the caring and patience needed to gain a patient’s trust.
...hoose from. Today there are not near as many airlines to choose from which creates an almost monopolistic feel in the airline industry. Now there are maybe two or three airlines to choose from which creates an oligopoly. According to the Huffington Post, “In oligopoly competition situation, prices move in lock step, even without overt (and illegal!) collusion between the parties” (Neches). So in the end the merger is really not looking too good for the Airline industry. Not only is the merger not looking good for the industry, but for the company as well. Merging two broken companies will not produce a strong company. Everything from Computer system malfunctions, union issues, and aircraft malfunctions have plagued every single step of this merger. The United-Continental merger may have made them the largest airliner in the world, but it has not made them the best.
When two companies decide to combine forces and become one bigger, richer mega company, it is called merging. This process forms a new company, combining the money and ideas of what used to be two different entities into one. This, however, is not the only thing that results from merging two different companies, and since we will be discussing the merging of two companies in the pharmaceutical industry, the impact will be incredible. Of course, the merging of two companies will not only have positive impacts but it will have many negative side effects as well. Furthermore, depending on the size of the merging companies and the goals of the people leading these companies there will always be contradictions according to the long-term goals or short-term goals depending on what both parties’ interests are. Our company, Verduga Inc. is contemplating to merge with Coronado-Salinas Inc., so before we rush into such a merger we must contemplate the positive and negative aspects of such a move. When it comes to mergers there are always many possible positive and negative impacts due to the effects of merging; these effects more widely impact the fields on research and development, on employment and management, stocks and shareholders, monopolization, and ingenuity.
Firms with market power or monopolies are often seen as detrimental for customers and economic welfare. According to the neoclassical theory, the market power of monopolies and oligopolies is potentially higher than that of firms in monopolistic or perfect competition since they have to face very limited competition, if any (Ferguson and Ferguson 1994). In monopolistic or perfect competition can make supernormal profits in the short term but eventually other firms will enter the market and offer alternative products that reduce the demand for the established firm’s products (Sloman et al., 2013 p. 177). Dissimilarly, this is not the case for dominant firms or monopolies; the lack of competition allows them to set prices and make supernormal profits increasing the perception that big companies are “bad” for consumers. As shown by the graphs in Figure 1 and 2, there are substantial differences in the competitive and monopoly markets. In a competitive environment, the equilibrium is reached where demand meets supply. In a monopolistic market, thanks to the establishment of higher prices and the production of lower quantities, monopolies or dominant firms make supernormal profits; additionally, there is a deadweight loss and some consumers who were willing to pay lower prices wil...
I was born in a small town of India.I come from a family backgroung where no one ever went to college .My father was'nt that well educated so he always wanted to bestow us with the best education he can , because he suffered alot and servive all hardships.
Others work in design, construction, research, and teaching. They work with others on projects and may be assisted by civil engineering technicians and technologists. Various levels of government employ civil engineers to do many of the same things done in private industry, except that the government-employed civil engineers may also inspect projects to be sure that they comply with regulations. Civil engineers generally work indoors in offices. However, they sometimes spend time outdoors at construction sites so they can monitor operations or solve problems at the site. Occasionally, civil engineers travel abroad to work on large engineering projects in other countries.
Mergers mean two or more companies combining together to form one business or firm. There are six different types of mergers: Horizontal, Vertical, Conglomerate, Market extension, Product Extension and Diversified activity.