Care And Treatment In Prisoners And Mental Illness By Sarah Glazer

1071 Words3 Pages

Mental illness may be something one is born with or may be a consequence of poor choices. According to the article “Prisoners and Mental Illness,” written by Sarah Glazer, many mentally ill people are in prison. Mental illnesses are manageable with care and treatment such as medication and therapy. However, the care and treatment in some prisons are close to non-existent. The illnesses such as psychotic disorders, dissociative disorders, impulse control and addiction disorders, are rarely properly dealt with. While most ingress of people into prison, are already ill, some prison conditions can onset mental illness. The closing of psychiatric hospitals has consequently led prisons to become major institutions for the mentally ill, which implement …show more content…

Mahoney states, “Often, a mentally ill person lands in jail for disorderly conduct when [the ‘crime’ is the fact that he’s off his med-ications,]” [...] (qtd. in Glazer 244). Solitary confinement has become the most used forms of punishment in correctional facilities. Derek S. Jeffreys author of “Cruel but Not Unusual” states, “To be sure, some selected for solitary have committed crimes, or are violent and incapable of living with others. Many, however, are guilty of only minor disciplinary infractions. Thousands are thrown into solitary for alleged gang association, insubordination, possession of contraband material, protests against prison conditions, or even for writing allegedly subversive essays” (21). Some of those in solitary confinement are there only for allegedly violating regulations. When charges meted out to normal prisoners without actual proof, then confining a person for a transgression rooted in mental illness seems plausible. Mental illness affects personality, mind, and emotions, resulting in reoccurring disruptive behavior. The author of “Punishing …show more content…

Although court- supervised treatment is new, “In a frequently cited evaluation of four mental health courts in California, Minneapolis and Indianapo-lis, 49 percent of participants were re-arrested after 18 months, compared with 58 percent of mentally ill defendants in the conventional court system. [...] seeing almost half of a program’s participants re-arrested may not sound like resounding success”(Glazer 247). It has made some headway; there are still a few kinks to work out. Just as co-author Allison Redlich, an associate professor of criminal justice at the State University of New York, Al-bany declares, “This population has earned the name ‘frequent fliers,’[for the fre-quency of their arrests, [so any kind of reduction can be a success. [...] Trying to figure out how and for whom they work is where we should be focusing our efforts” (qtd. in Glazer 247). We have about fifty-five years of a mounted mental illness problems, current solutions for the mentally ill in prisons are but an easy escape from delving into our rotten penal

Open Document