Meditations On First Philosophy By Rene Descartes

1540 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Reflection of the philosopher rene Descartes

The book entitled Meditations on First Philosophy is a philosophical treatise of Rene Descartes. It is first published in 1641 in Latin. Then, it is translated to several languages such as French in the latter years. In his book Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes tries to accomplish several subject concerns. Firstly, Descartes attempts to accomplish the use of methodological doubt to rid himself of all beliefs that could be false. Then, he arrives at particular beliefs that could not possibly be false. Next, he discovers a criterion of knowledge. Also, he proves that the mind is distinct from the body and also the existence of God. Simply reading and summarizing the book of Descartes, it is difficult for me to imagine the contents of …show more content…

In Philosophy, I learned that to be a human being, one must need to be rational, and to be rational is to philosophize. The book Meditation of First Philosophy is a journal about his meditation, about his life. Since it is a journal and it is considered to be an autobiography of his life, we can conclude from his book that he spent several years of his life to philosophical inquiry. He was in quest in searching for the truth. During his life, he exercised his nature as thinking human being. Secondly, his passion in searching for the absolute certainty amazed me because his passion proves that he is committed on what he is doing. His passion causes him to pursue and reach his goal. I believe that this journal of him does not happen in one day or in one month. Hence, I believe his meditation lasted for long time so that he would be sure of what he is claiming …show more content…

However, the permanent changes are only applicable to physical objects. In Descartes argument, he observes a piece of wax, from a hive, and using his judgment and senses, analyzes the structure and properties of the wax. This argument is an attempt to prove that the essential properties of things are not perceived through the senses, but through the mind. With this, Descartes reminds me as a human being to avoid being dependent to the senses. Though through matter by which we can be able to know something, depending on our senses is sometimes unreliable. The most interesting part of this discussion is that despite of the changing characteristics of physical objects, there will still be that character that will be stayed the

Show More
Related

  • Descartes’ arguments in the Third meditation

    1335 Words  | 3 Pages

    The meditator’s endeavor in Rene Descartes’ meditations on first philosophy is introduced through a biographical account, with which any reader can relate. Realizing how in the past he had “accepted many false claims as true” and “how everything [he] had later constructed on top of those falsehoods was doubtful”, he feels the need to “tear everything down completely and begin from the most basic foundations”. His objective is to establish a body of knowledge which is absolutely certain.

    Read More

  • Exploring Knowledge and Doubt in 'Meditations on First Philosophy'

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the book "Meditations on First Philosophy", author talks about knowledge and doubt. He considers doubt and knowledge a very strong tool and thus, states a philosophical method which is actually an extraordinarily powerful investigation of mind, body and rationalism. He formulates six meditations in this book, where he first discards all of his previous beliefs where things are not completely certain and then he tries to build things that can be surely known. He believed that people should do their own discerning and by using the process of simple mathematics, they could proceed on a path to an unquestioned knowledge. He wrote these meditations in a way supposing that he has meditated for six days, referring each last meditation as ‘yesterday’.

    Read More

  • A Spiritual Journey In René Descartes's Six Meditations

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    When working in solitude on his six Meditations, René Descartes wrote a first person narrative inviting his audience on a spiritual journey that is centered on the reader. Readers are encouraged to doubt all prior certainties such as reality, perception and even one’s own existence. Printed in 1641, Meditation I, subtitled "What can be called into doubt," asks meditators to reflect on everything believed to be true, then ruthlessly question that body of knowledge built up from these illusions.

    Read More

  • Descartes Beliefs

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes main objective in his meditations is to question or doubt knowledge and for him, in order to get an unbiased knowledge; he basically started from zero and questioned everything. He uses radical form of skepticism in his investigation for the absolute truth. I think that Descartes wrote the meditations to reaffirm his beliefs and/or to justify his beliefs. Most of the ideas that he tried to prove where based on the existence of god. Rene Descartes was a devout catholic and being one of the key figures in the scientific revolution, I think he had conflicting thoughts about what he believes and tried to prove his beliefs with the Meditations.

    Read More

  • Descartes Sixth Meditation

    1379 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes is hopeful to prove subsistence of the external world (physical objects located in space), and so he returns to a very basic stage and acknowledges the existence of minds as an immaterial substance and God. He then accepts that matter exists as long as it is not a projection of his own mind or God. As Descartes previously established the existence of God as a perfect being, he therefore has concluded that God is not a deceiver. This very clear concept leads him to accept his clear and distinct sensory experiences are a result of external objects of material nature. Once these corporeal things (objects of a tangible, material nature) can be considered as self-evident ideas, they can no longer be products of the mind or God.

    Read More

  • Meditations in First Philosophy

    863 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the first meditation of “Meditations in First Philosophy”, Descartes writes about the things he once considered to be certain truths which now can be proven as doubts. These are a few of his assertions.

    Read More

  • The First Philosophy Of Descartes

    809 Words  | 2 Pages

    Therefore, in Meditation two in Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes proves to show the distinction between the mind and that of the body. Descartes knows without a doubt that he is a thinking thing who has certain powers such as affirming, denying, sensing, imagining etc. The example that he provided with the piece of wax showed how we could misjudge and come to error when perceiving a thing. Descartes is able to prove that he exists in the same way that he judged the existence of the wax and how he saw it. Most importantly, Descartes comes to the conclusion that the intellect of the mind is what helps distinct and perceive something, rather than other factors.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

    2108 Words  | 5 Pages

    Descartes believes that knowledge comes from within the mind. This is a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes writes his Six Meditations. In these meditations, Descartes tries to develop a strong foundation, which all knowledge can be built upon. In the First Meditation, Descartes begins developing this foundation through the method of doubt. He casts doubt upon all his previous beliefs, including “matters which are not entirely certain and indubitable [and] those which appear to be manifestly false.” (Descartes, p.75, par.3) Once Descartes clears away all beliefs that can be called into doubt, he can then build a strong base for all true knowledge to stand upon. Descartes attacks all his previous beliefs by going to the root of their origin, the senses and intellect. He then supposes to say that everything he presumed to be absolutely true, such as simple arithmetic, was created by an evil demon.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

    1319 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes set the groundwork for seventeenth century rationalism, the view opposed by the empiricist school of thought. As a rationalist, Descartes firmly believed in reason as the principal source of knowledge. He favoured deduction and intellect over the senses and because of this he did not find comfort in believing that his opinions, which he had developed in his youth, were credible. It is for this reason that Rene Descartes chose to “raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations,” (13). On page thirteen of his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes made the claim that these opinions from his youth were false, and therefore those opinions that he had built upon them were also false. In this book, Descartes claims to have freed his mind of all those false opinions and begins by believing nothing, because he is attempting to obtain an objective view of the truth, and this is something he cannot do if he is being influenced by his previous misconceptions. On page fourteen, just before nineteen in the margins, Descartes discusses the deceptive nature of the senses. He claims that “whatever I had admitted until now as most true I received either from the senses or through the senses” (14), and because Descartes believes that we should never put our trust in anything that has deceived us even once (14), he concludes that he cannot trust anything he has known as true up until now. This is Descartes’ reasoning behind doubting everything he once thought he knew, and from this conclusion, he goes on to arrive at the one absolute certainty that he exists.

    Read More

  • René Descartes Does Not Reject Sense Perception

    2400 Words  | 5 Pages

    Some have suggested that René Descartes argues that sense perception relies on the mind rather than on the body. Descartes asserts that we can know our mind more readily than we can know our body. In support of this idea he gives the example of a piece of wax which is observed in its solid form and its liquid form. After pointing out the difficulties of relying on the senses of the physical body to understand the nature of the wax he makes this claim: [P]erception ... is neither a seeing, nor a touching, nor an imagining. ... [R]ather it is an inspection on the part of the mind alone (Section 31). 1 This quote is perhaps the most direct statement of the author's thesis on this subject.

    Read More

  • Descartes Skepticism

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes’ first two Meditations are arguably the most widely known philosophical works. Because of this, one can make the error of assuming that Descartes’ method of doubt is self-evident and that its philosophical implications are relatively minor. However, to assume this would be a grave mistake. In this paper, I hope to spread light on exactly what Descartes’ method of doubt is, and how, though it furnishes challenges for the acceptance of the reality of the external world, it nonetheless does not lead to external world skepticism.

    Read More

  • Descartesian Epistemology Essay

    1226 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes was born 1596 in France. At eight years old he was already in college. Descartes was a scientist and was also known as the father of modern Western Philosophy. He is famous for his book “The mediations of philosophy,” first published in 1641. He is much like me because he refused to stem off other philosophers thought. Instead, he created his philosophy. He is most famous for his quote “I think therefore I am.” This paper will include Descartes doubt, Descartes the cogito, his knowledge of the material world. The principles of the Cartesian epistemology. The “light of nature.”

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Descartes Foundationalism

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this paper I will describe the foundationalist structure of Descartes’ arguments in his work Meditations on First Philosophy. Foundationalism is the view that there are some beliefs are epistemologically basic and can be known without knowing anything else is true (Loeb, Lecture 1-14). For example, philosophers such as Descartes would acknowledge that geometric truths, such as 2 + 2 = 4, are so fundamental that they don’t need to be proven through argumentation. Thus, these truths can provide the basic foundation for further arguments. In my paper, I will show that two foundational claims of Descartes are first, the existence of the mind, and second, the existence of God. From these claims Descartes derives many others, including the argument for material objects and souls. As I lay out Descartes’ case, I will examine the philosophical soundness and validity of his foundationalist account, as well as its merits and potential weaknesses. In the end, I will conclude that Descartes’ foundationalism, while alluring in its simplicity, does not survive deeper investigation.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes and the Source of Knowledge

    2129 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...ll true knowledge is solely knowledge of the self, its existence, and relation to reality. René Descartes' approach to the theory of knowledge plays a prominent role in shaping the agenda of early modern philosophy. It continues to affect (some would say "infect") the way problems in epistemology are conceived today. Students of philosophy (in his own day, and in the history since) have found the distinctive features of his epistemology to be at once attractive and troubling; features such as the emphasis on method, the role of epistemic foundations, the conception of the doubtful as contrasting with the warranted, the skeptical arguments of the First Meditation, and the cogito ergo sum--to mention just a few that we shall consider. Depending on context, Descartes thinks that different standards of warrant are appropriate. The context for which he is most famous, and on which the present treatment will focus, is that of investigating First Philosophy. The first-ness of First Philosophy is (as Descartes conceives it) one of epistemic priority, referring to the matters one must "first" confront if one is to succeed in acquiring systematic and expansive knowledge.

    Read More

  • The Contemplation Of The Meditator, By Descartes

    1831 Words  | 4 Pages

    Descartes turned all inquiries of human information internal by first considering the procedure of deduction itself, inspecting the strategy for knowing as an essential for expecting that specific learning has been accomplished. Descartes was attempting to discover an assortment of obvious and undeniable truths that each individual of sound judgment and reason could acknowledge. On the off chance that truths could be built up in theory as they had been in arithmetic, this would end the verbal confrontations about the presence of God, the interminability of the spirit, and the truth of the outside world. In the main contemplation, Descartes starts by questioning all learning that he has beforehand acknowledged as genuine. Up to the present time, he says, he has acknowledged the learning gained through tactile experience as the most genuine and the most certain information; yet sense recognitions might be illusions, the results of dreams or mind flights, or the results of an almighty being bringing about these sensations or thoughts to shape. People could exist in a drawn out "dream express" that

    Read More

More about Meditations On First Philosophy By Rene Descartes

Open Document