Medication Testing Case Study

1823 Words4 Pages

In January of 1996, six months after the United States Supreme Court decided that it was suitable for Oregon's school locale, 47J in Vernonia, to require understudy competitors in center school and secondary school to take an interest in arbitrary, medication tests. One percent out of the 16,000 schools in the nation had brought the irregular medication testing into their offices. (Taylor, Robert) Even however the Supreme Court managed along these lines, they didn't feel this testing was a smart thought. There needed to of been some purpose behind this. (Bailey, William) If stand out 16,000 schools get on medication testing as a smart thought, then there is more than likely something that the schools don't believe is right with it or they …show more content…

(Bailey, William) There ought to be an explanation behind the schools to single out competitors from alternate understudies for medication testing. The main proper purposes behind giving so as to treat competitors distinctively them medication tests would be in the event that they more inclined to utilize drugs than different understudies, they were at more serious danger of utilizing medications, the utilization of medications being more dangerous to them, or that the tests will probably return positive for competitors. It is valid in a few schools over the United States, that competitors will probably devour liquor at a weekend party, yet in the event that a pee test were taken the next week, it would come back clean. So this testing would just be an exercise in futility and cash. Understudy competitors more than likely realize that there are approach to beat a medication test so they won't dither to drink at any …show more content…

With the schools utilizing the minimum precise method for testing, by what means would we be able to make certain they are getting the right results. On the off chance that a medication test returns positive, the test will be regulated again with a more exact strategy, so they will make sure that the understudy is really utilizing medications, which would cost up to several dollars if the tests were really being valuable. The NCAA utilizes these more exact tests and it costs them more than 200 dollars for each test. In the other case, immunoassay tests frequently tend to create what is known as a "false negative." A false negative is the point at which a test is sent in that ought to return positive, yet rather it returns negative. This is a gigantic wad of cash and time on the grounds that the medication testing is not notwithstanding achieving what it should be. So the medication testing of competitors wouldn't be a valuable instrument in battling medication use among government funded school competitors. A decent case of a false negative is an understudy who confessed to utilizing maryjane all the time and his mentor made him take nine separate medication tests. Every time these medication tests were given back the outcomes were negative. (Bailey, William) This shows how conceivable it is for the testing to be off base. Just in

Open Document