Medical Ethics Between Physician and Patient

2170 Words5 Pages

Medical ethics refers to the standards of conduct and associated values which govern the relationship between practitioner and patient in biomedical contexts. Adding to this concept is bioethics that covers the values and standards that should apply to research (scientific), doctors, nurses and other biomedical practitioner’s activities. Bioethics attempts to influence how practitioners of biomedicine act within the realms of biomedicine. Yet, it is apparent that both of these concepts (medical and bioethics) tend only to govern western biomedicine.

The alternative, medical ethno-ethics, Richard Lieban suggests is the “moral tenets and problems of health care as they are conceived and reacted to by members of a society” (as cited in Joralemon, 2010, p. 106). Is medical ethno-ethics an alternative to medical and bioethics, applicable to both traditional systems of healing and biomedicine?

For the purposes of this assignment (in particular part a), I will discuss ethics and whether or not a universal concept can be applicable to all systems of healing that acknowledges the many cultural norms and values that guide healing behaviours, and discuss the anthropologist intervening in a medical context. For Part b, I will discuss psychoactive substances (party pills) and animal testing as a current medical ethical issue in New Zealand.

So, is it possible to have a code of ethics that is universally applicable to all systems of healing, biomedicine, traditional and all those in between?

To understand what therapeutic methods has to do with each culture’s definitions of medicine, treatment, health and the boundaries that may (or may not) separate healing practices from religions, or political, or familial. We will see healing merging w...

... middle of paper ...

...human consumption is due to the testing of toxic substances on animals for results that may produce both false positives and false negatives. That drugs produce different effects in animals as they do in humans, for example, caffeine which is highly toxic to dogs (and is found in party pills) is virtually harmless to humans. To the point that animal testing conducted outside of New Zealand is of greater risk to the animal as many countries, such as China and India who conduct animal testing have little to no animal welfare protection for the animals used. We must consider whether psychoactive substances (that have no medical benefits) that fall under the ‘legal high’ umbrella have a place within our society, and whether we can accept the harmful and potentially fatal testing of animals to provide possibly inaccurate data for optional recreational drug use.

Open Document