Medical Confidentiality Case Study

Medicinal confidentiality has gone under assault in people in general circle. In late catastrophes public writers and government officials have addressed therapeutic classification and guaranteed that settings doctors ought to be constrained to impart information on their patients' wellbeing. The killings of guiltless people by a self-destructive pilot have created polemical open deliberations on the point. In this essay, related information on medicinal classification is utilized to demonstrate that restorative practices of privacy were frequently assaulted before, and that the idea of therapeutic privacy advanced through time contingent upon doctors' esteems and judgements. The fact that the notion of medical confidentiality is almost as

Absolutism -the rule must never be breached (Seay, 2017) Based on the basic law for the Federal Republic of Germany, Article I (Human Dignity- Human rights- legally binding force of basic rights) and Article 2 (Personal Freedoms Protects) gives individual full autonomy to one’s medical records. A treating physician or any medical professional in Germany cannot disclose any medical diagnose and/ or treatment as it is a criminal offense. These laws remain in effect after an individual die. The only time an exception is made is when; it is related to epidemic diseases. The constitutional protection in this case makes the pilot Andreas Lubitz responsible to disclose his inability to fly due to medical reasons. As his treating doctor(s) has no legal obligation to make the aviation authorities aware of the risks. Considering the Right-Theory Perspective the secrecy lead caught a basic negative obligation of social insurance supplier that is related with deference for singular security. Like the privilege to settle on claim choice about restorative treatment, classification is a negative right since it doesn't require the arrangement of help by

The basic law is extremely stringed and that the treatment physicians should be given more flexibility in disclosing certain types of medical condition to the employers, which has a direct impact on workplace. Public safety cannot outweigh the individual’s right to doctor- patient privilege. This incident could have been prevented if his medical condition was made known to his employer. Physicians should be empowered with using their medical judgement on when they think their patient are risk to the society due to their medical condition. These basic laws should be revised and various criteria’s or exceptions should be placed so that the safety of other individual is protected along with the individual’s own rights. The Germanwings tragedy gives us opportunity to evaluate our outdated policies and provides us with a platform to start a conversation on mental illness and, how such law compromises an individual care and welfare of