Medical Coding Nomenclatures

1189 Words3 Pages

Medical coding nomenclatures and classifications have extreme importance when assessing the patients’ diagnosis, billing, and more. They also make it possible to standardize health information so there is interoperability, accurate health information exchange, and reliable secondary data usage. The common medical coding nomenclatures and classifications are SNOMED CT, ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS, and CPT. The implementation of these have changed medical coding and impacted the workforce in many ways. Outpatient and inpatient healthcare settings had to adapt to the systems’ requirements necessary to meet clinical and billing objectives.
The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms, SNOMED CT, according to Sayles and Gordon (2016), …show more content…

The tenth revision, Clinical Modification of ICD (ICD-10-CM) was implemented in the United States in 2015 to replace ICD-9-CM. ICD-10-CM is intended for billing purposes and enables a more comprehensive understanding of patients’ health conditions. ICD-10-Procedure Coding System (PCS), like CPT, it identifies the procedure performed by the provider. The purpose of ICD-10-PCS is to deliver a system for classifying procedures done on hospital inpatients. According to Sayles and Gordon (2016), “ it provides a unique code for all substantially different procedures, both currently known and those that may be identified at some future in date” (Sayles and Gordon …show more content…

It was a hard transition process and required a lot of training and preparation. While ICD-9 contained over 17,00 codes, ICD-10 has over 144,000 codes. Diagnosis codes increased from around 13,500 to 69,000, and hospital inpatient procedure codes increased from 4,000 codes to 71,000 codes (Centafont, 2015). The transition provided a more thorough understanding of patients’ health conditions and more precise billing of health services delivered. ICD-10-CM has up seven digits codes, while ICD-9 had up to 5. The codes in ICD-10 are more specified, with the additions of laterality, descriptions using anatomical, physiological, and disease process terminology, and episode of care. Those additions are believed to enable more specificity, and deliver more useful information for research, quality improvement, and public health initiatives. The Impact on the Workforce. The transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 has impacted inpatient and outpatient settings in many ways. Some specialty clinics may have experienced a smooth transition due to the lower number of patients and perhaps staff. According to Cavit (2015), “in audiology, this should be a straightforward transition with the right training and the right tools” (Cavit, 2015). In the case of audiology practices, for example, the change was mostly because of in ICD-10 there is more specificity like ear distinction. Cavit also explained that “unless you have a

Open Document