Medical Assistance or License to Kill: Uncovering the Controversy of Physician Assisted Suicide

explanatory Essay

936 words

Controversy is a state of prolonged public dispute or debate, usually concerning a matter with opposing opinions or different point of views. Environmental protections, animal rights, medical marijuana, and gay marriage are all controversial issues that are well known throughout the media today. There are a few controversial matters that are not a top priority, and are pushed to the back of the media until need be. Physician assisted suicide is one these matters. Just as the name says, physician assisted suicide is the aiding in a patients wish to move along the process of death through suicide where the assistant is a physician. This process is only legal in three states, and is just recently rising up and becoming a bigger issue in other states. Physician assisted suicide is a way to relieve patients of their suffering, yet doctors are under an oath that entitles them to neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor make a suggestion to this effect, and the families that they are leaving may act in a different way than expected. Being a terminally ill patient and suffering from lymphocytic leukemia, one Montana man was hoping to find a physician to help him be put out of his misery sooner than later. Robert Baxter knew that his time was running short and that after twelve years of chemotherapy, he was not getting any better. He also knew that at this time a physician assisting with death was against the law. Baxter, along with four other Montana doctors and the organization of Compassion & Choices, filed a case seeking recognition that the right to choose aid in dying is protected by the Montana Constitution’s guarantees of privacy, dignity and equal protection (Compassion & Choices, 2012). From this case, Baxter w... ... middle of paper ... ...r. Letting doctors hold the patient’s life in their own hands is a good choice most of the time, but in situations like that, life needs to be in the hands of the patient. With the help of physician assisted suicide, this may become possible. This practice is still a controversy throughout the world today, with each side having a different opinion, but one day those opinions will be set aside long enough to figure out a final solution. Works Cited Compassion & Choices (2012). Baxter et al v. Montana James, S. D. (2009). Families of Dying Say Assisted Suicide Is Right Miller, K. S. (2013). Opinions on physician-assisted suicide sharply divided, poll shows Dr. Gloth, M. F. (2009). Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Wrong Approach to End Of Life Care HealthDay News (2013). Patients, families 'grateful' for physician-assisted suicide program

In this essay, the author

Explains that controversial issues like environmental protections, animal rights, medical marijuana, and gay marriage are well known in the media. physician assisted suicide is a way to relieve patients of their suffering, yet doctors are under an oath.
Explains how robert baxter, a terminally ill montana patient, was hoping to find the right to choose aid in dying, protected by the montana constitution's guarantees of privacy, dignity, and equal protection.
Explains that dr. kevorkian is one of many firm supporters of physician assisted suicide and the "right to die" legislation.

Explains that controversial issues like environmental protections, animal rights, medical marijuana, and gay marriage are well known in the media. physician assisted suicide is a way to relieve patients of their suffering, yet doctors are under an oath.
Explains how robert baxter, a terminally ill montana patient, was hoping to find the right to choose aid in dying, protected by the montana constitution's guarantees of privacy, dignity, and equal protection.
Explains that dr. kevorkian is one of many firm supporters of physician assisted suicide and the "right to die" legislation.
Explains that the american college of physicians and american medical association oppose physician assisted suicide as a matter of principle.
Explains that although physician assisted suicide is mainly focused on the patient choosing to die, the families they leave behind may resent or respect their decision.
Opines that physician assisted suicide should be legal, as it relieves patients from their suffering and gives some families a sense of respect and acceptance of the death.
Opines that the practice of physician assisted suicide is still a controversy throughout the world today, with each side having their own opinions.

Click here to unlock this and over one million essays

Continue Reading Check Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
opinion essay
In the discussion of physician assisted suicide, one controversial issue has been whether or not it should become legal across the United States. On one hand, some oppose that it is not right for individuals to take their own life, with a physician 's help. On the other hand, if you are terminally ill and in a lot of pain, you should have the right to end your life with the help of a physician or someone else 's help. My view of the topic is that I am for allowing those people who are terminally ill to end their life to quit their suffering. However, people someone should check to see if the law is safe. If the law is not safe, then they should take the time to make it safe. Maybe there needs to be some arrangements that need to be fixed or adjusted.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that terminally ill people should have the right to end their life with a physician or someone else's help. if the law is not safe, they should take the time to make it safe.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is legal in three states: oregon, washington, and vermont. the terminally ill are the only ones who should be allowed for this.
- Opines that no one should force someone going through a lot of pain to stay alive until their body decides to give up.
- Opines that terminally ill people should have the right to end their life with a physician or someone else's help. if the law is not safe, they should take the time to make it safe.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is legal in three states: oregon, washington, and vermont. the terminally ill are the only ones who should be allowed for this.
- Opines that no one should force someone going through a lot of pain to stay alive until their body decides to give up.
- Explains serena gordon's point that physician assisted suicide should only be for terminally ill people who feel that they can no longer stand the pain.
- Opines that terminally ill patients should have the right to die with dignity and dignity, if denied access to physician assisted suicide.
- Argues that insurance companies should not reject sick people a treatment because they agree to give them the pill and pay for the treatment.
- Opines that people should not view physician assisted suicide as a negative thing but as positive because it is there to help the terminally ill.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide should be allowed only in certain states. patients must be 18 years of age or older, be physically and mentally capable of self-administering the aid-in-dying drug, and be diagnosed with terminal illness.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide should not be legal anywhere around the world because people may take advantage of it.
- Argues that the danger of abuse is the strongest argument against having any legal right to physician-assisted suicide under united states law.
- Argues that legalizing euthanasia would damage foundational societal values and symbols that uphold respect for human life. physician assisted suicide should not be legalized in every state.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide will continue to be a controversial issue to whether it should or shouldn't be legal across the united states.
1512 words
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
opinion essay
The American Medical Association (AMA) policy states, “ Physician assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as a healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks."(Pearson, John). As a healer, one should go to their absolute limits to make sure their patient is progressing in their health. Regardless of how serious their health risks are, physicians should be supportive and ensure the patient that they will do everything in their power to help them surmount their illnes...
In this essay, the author
- Describes the concept of physician assisted suicide, whereby doctors assist their patients in committing suicide by offering deadly drugs and narcotics.
- Explains the hippocratic oath, which requires all new physicians to swear upon a number of healing gods that he will uphold professional ethical standards.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide is incompatible with the physician's role as a healer and would pose serious societal risks.
- Describes the concept of physician assisted suicide, whereby doctors assist their patients in committing suicide by offering deadly drugs and narcotics.
- Explains the hippocratic oath, which requires all new physicians to swear upon a number of healing gods that he will uphold professional ethical standards.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide is incompatible with the physician's role as a healer and would pose serious societal risks.
- Explains that there are numerous religions that oppose the idea of suicide, or taking one's own life.
- Explains that in the catholic religion, suicide is considered a mortal sin. in 1980, the catholic church proclaimed the declaration of euthanasia.
- Explains that muslims believe that assisted suicide is wrong and that there is only one person who is worthy of taking one's life.
- Explains that hindus oppose euthanasia because they believe in reincarnation, which is the belief that after death, your soul will live again.
- Explains that judaism opposes any kind of idea of suicide and believes that their bodies belong to their almighty god.
- Explains that there are laws around the world that oppose assisted physician suicide, such as the suicide act, which states that a single suggestion or attempt to assist someone in their death is illegal.
- Explains that only three states in the united states legalized assisted suicide — washington, oregon, and vermont.
- Argues that most patients who ask for assisted suicide are mentally unstable and don't realize what they are asking. mental illnesses like depression and schizophrenia can distort your decisions.
- Defines depression as severe despondency and dejection, typically felt over a period of time, accompanied by feelings of hopelessness and inadequacy.
- Explains that schizophrenia distorts the mind's decisions. schizophrenia involves a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception.
- Argues that it is unfair to take the life of someone who cannot even justify that this is what they want. patients with mental diseases may change their minds about the desire for death, but without compassion and patience from a physician they could never get that chance.
- Defines misdiagnosis as an inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis or treatment of a disease, injury, syndrome, behavior, infection, or other illness. some physical symptoms can actually be caused by yet another mental disease called hypochondriasis.
- Defines hypochondriasis as a mental illness in which symptoms cannot be fully explained by an actual physical disorder.
- Opines that if physician assisted suicide was illegal, the life of a physically healthy human can be saved.
- Explains that assisted suicide is illegal because it supports the concept that anyone who is terminally ill, old, or incompetent should not have the right to live.
- Argues that elders and terminally ill patients are useless because they cannot function as well as younger and healthier human beings. however, they find comfort in being surrounded by their loved ones in their time of sadness and worthlessness.
- Opines that patients who request physician assisted suicide are experiencing rough times and do not know how to cope.
- Argues that physicians assisted suicide is legalizing murder, but there's no difference between a random act of murder and physician-assisted suicide because regardless, the result is death.
- Explains the american medical association proposes a policy for alternatives to physician assisted suicide that includes specialty consultation, hospice care, pastoral support, family counseling and other modalities.
- Opines that assisted suicide is needed to avoid the excruciating pain and suffering. in today's society, pain management has progressed so profusely that it is possible to effectively control pain in dying patients.
- Explains that hospice care is a program to help those who are suffering. the nurses assigned will administer pain medications, talk you through things, and give you comfort knowing you’re not alone.
- Opines that patients experience less pain than patients who suffered the same illness decades ago. morphine, one of the most common pain medications, is used frequently today.
- Explains that oxycontin is used to treat moderate to severe pain that lasts for an extended period of time. this medication abolishes all pain symptoms and makes the patient feel comfortable.
- Explains that robert pearlman, professor of medicine, interviewed 35 families asking the reason why patient's requested assisted suicide. they found that pain was the least of their worries.
- Concludes that assisted suicide is unnecessary, but there are alternatives. it's not your last resort. many medical associations and professionals offer programs to assist you in getting the specific comfort you need.
- Calls on the world to illegalize assisted suicide. it should not be legal to take the life of an innocent human being because of illness or old age.
2320 words
Read More
The Issue Of Doctor Assisted Suicide
analytical essay
...end of life. Therefore, doctor-assisted suicide should be legalized to meet the needs of terminally ill patients and to compensate for the insufficiency of current medical practice. In conclusion, the most crucial point of the doctor-assisted suicide law is "Who would it protect?" It is clear that the best effect of the doctor-assisted suicide law is in its ability to give some advantages to all dying patients. Therefore, although it has been argued that legalizing doctor-assisted suicide is harmful to terminally ill patients, counterproductive and violates the tradition of medicine, it is suggested that physician-assisted suicide be legalized in that this law will dramatically improve the current medical environment for dying patients. It is hoped that giving the informed choice of legalized assisted suicide will make terminally ill patients ' lives more meaningful.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide should be legalized because it offers terminally ill people an opportunity for a peaceful death and recognizes the inadequacy of current medical practice.
- Analyzes maskin's argument that dying patients' thinking is occupied by negative reactions to their critical condition. they argue that terminally ill patients need therapy and counseling.
- Explains that terminally ill patients in oregon who voluntarily asked doctors to help them commit suicide were those who took advantage of the doctor-assisted suicide law.
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide should be legalized because it offers terminally ill people an opportunity for a peaceful death and recognizes the inadequacy of current medical practice.
- Analyzes maskin's argument that dying patients' thinking is occupied by negative reactions to their critical condition. they argue that terminally ill patients need therapy and counseling.
- Explains that terminally ill patients in oregon who voluntarily asked doctors to help them commit suicide were those who took advantage of the doctor-assisted suicide law.
- Argues that the constitution allows every person to have free will, including a mentally competent, terminally ill adult to commit physician-assisted suicide.
- Argues that the medical community should provide better treatment for terminally ill patients.
- Argues that the best effect of the doctor-assisted suicide law is in its ability to give some advantages to all dying patients.
1552 words
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
opinion essay
Imagine a family member being extremely ill and suffering from day to day. When they decide they cannot take the pain any more, would you want them to pull through for you or would you fulfill their dying wish and let the doctor pull the plug? Could you even make a decision? Many people would not allow such an event to happen because with all the pain and confusion the patient is enduring may cause confusion and suicidal tendencies. However, there are people who believe otherwise. This is called physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. Though it is only legal in the three states Oregon, Washington and Montana, there are many people who are for it and think it can be necessary. Even with morals put aside, Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal because it will be a huge violation of the oath every doctor must abide by, there would be no real way to distinguish between people who are suffering and the people who are faking or depressed, and it causes a lot of confusion to people with new diseases or new strands of disease that does not have a clear cure.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that doctors will violate their oath, and innocent people will be dying along with the pas patients.
- Opines that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide would cause problems with the development of cures for new diseases or new strands of disease.
- Argues that the physician-assisted suicide movement has many flaws that could potentially create a downfall in our health system.
- Opines that doctors will violate their oath, and innocent people will be dying along with the pas patients.
- Opines that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide would cause problems with the development of cures for new diseases or new strands of disease.
- Argues that the physician-assisted suicide movement has many flaws that could potentially create a downfall in our health system.
- Opines that pas should be banned everywhere, since it violates the hippocratic oath, letting innocent people die a preventable death, and the struggles with new diseases.
- Argues that physician-assisted suicide (pas) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. it violates the hippocratic oath.
1385 words
Read More
Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
analytical essay
There have been thousands of argumentative essays on both sides and those who approve of physician-assisted suicide are more likely to support their ideas with comments about individual freedom and dying with dignity as a release from great pain while those on the other side use more ethereal and spiritual arguments. In general, it seems more reasonable to base our decisions about this practice on more empirical matters such as the right of the individual in deciding not to suffer rather more philosophical questions about religious doctrine and
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the right to physician assisted suicide should be granted to all citizens suffering from a degenerative, painful, or fatal condition that would cause them to be unable to enjoy their lives as healthy people.
- Opines that the most contentious debate about assisted suicide is when it is assisted by a physician as opposed to private citizen or family member. the debate is not free from questions about the responsibilities of the medical community and ethicists.
- Argues that the medical community should end pain and suffering by offering terminally ill patients an end to their life.
- Argues that the right to physician assisted suicide should be granted to all citizens suffering from a degenerative, painful, or fatal condition that would cause them to be unable to enjoy their lives as healthy people.
- Opines that the most contentious debate about assisted suicide is when it is assisted by a physician as opposed to private citizen or family member. the debate is not free from questions about the responsibilities of the medical community and ethicists.
- Argues that the medical community should end pain and suffering by offering terminally ill patients an end to their life.
- Argues that assisted suicide is cruel and inhumane since doctors are designated with the role of healing people, but terminally ill patients are forced to live against their will in unmanageable pain.
- Opines that the financial implications of keeping a loved one alive against his or her will are valid concerns for terminally ill patients.
- Opines that a botched suicide could have devastating consequences for the patient, but it should be the right of every citizen to escape unnecessary pain and suffering
- Explains that assisted suicide proponents view the issue as a matter of personal freedom and private choice, but many on the other side of the debate think about it in terms of ethics and religion.
- Explains that the issue of physician-assisted suicide is complex because sentiment about the practice ranges from strong support for personal freedoms to religious backlash that insists it is murder and against the teachings of god.
- Explains that the debate is complex because the core values of each side are rooted in two entirely different areas. those who approve of physician-assisted suicide are more likely to support their ideas with comments about individual freedom.
1295 words
Read More
Physician Assisted Suicide in the United States
analytical essay
When diagnosed with an incurable disease one may know they have no chance of living. Such diseases may be cancer, ALS, and even Alzheimer’s. Instead o suffering through the horrors and pain, a patient may suggest Physician Assisted Suicide to their doctor. Physician Assisted Suicide is defined as a prescription, written by the doctor(s), that if ingested will end the patient’s life. This process differs from Euthanasia, since Euthanasia is when the doctor of physician will inject the patient with a lethal injection. The process of PAD is easier for most patients since they could choose to die wherever they want. May it be their home or at the hospital, they get the rightful choice. Around the United States Physician Assisted Suicide is a controversial topic that is viewed and discussed either negatively or positively depending on a person’s viewpoint.
In this essay, the author
- Defines physician assisted suicide as a prescription, written by the doctor, that if ingested will end the patient’s life. it is easier for most patients since they could choose to die wherever they want.
- Explains that terminally ill people who have no mental disabilities are allowed to participate in physician-assisted suicide. they have the right and choice to initiate their own death.
- Explains the "death with dignity act" that was implanted in the seattle cancer care. the act contains numerous safeguards, such as no mental illness, no advertising and no patients who are solely there for death.
- Defines physician assisted suicide as a prescription, written by the doctor, that if ingested will end the patient’s life. it is easier for most patients since they could choose to die wherever they want.
- Explains that terminally ill people who have no mental disabilities are allowed to participate in physician-assisted suicide. they have the right and choice to initiate their own death.
- Explains the "death with dignity act" that was implanted in the seattle cancer care. the act contains numerous safeguards, such as no mental illness, no advertising and no patients who are solely there for death.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is not all rainbows and butterflies. it comes with many complications and wrongs.
- Explains the pros and cons of physician assisted suicide, stating that it allows a person to die with dignity and not humiliation.
- Argues that terminally ill people should have the choice to end their life when they choose. if physician assisted suicide was legal in 48 states, suicide rates might be lowered.
772 words
Read More
Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay
opinion essay
Physician assisted suicide is a choice. A choice of how to beat an inevitable death. It is in no way a path for everyone. If one’s idea of dying proud is fighting to the end, and letting their ailment engulf them, then that is their choice. Or if leaving this earth at peace, and being able to say “I lived a great life, and I intend to leave feeling accomplished”, is another’s way of dying dignified then so be it. It’s not about which option is taken, it’s that either way, we should have a choice and it should be ours to make.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that if assisted suicide is illegal, doesn't it take away our right to live the life we want?
- Opines that the legalization of pas would "trickle" down to clinically depressed people, or people who may survive but are sick of being in constant pain everyday.
- Explains that most people would not take their lives unless there was a legitimate reason. the elimination of physician aid to terminally ill patients was considered unconstitutional.
- Opines that if assisted suicide is illegal, doesn't it take away our right to live the life we want?
- Opines that the legalization of pas would "trickle" down to clinically depressed people, or people who may survive but are sick of being in constant pain everyday.
- Explains that most people would not take their lives unless there was a legitimate reason. the elimination of physician aid to terminally ill patients was considered unconstitutional.
- Describes physician assisted suicide as the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies.
- Opines that the government is supposed to protect its citizens, but taking away their right to a short, peaceful death and leaving them with the day to day suffering does the opposite of protection.
- Opines that physician assisted suicide is a choice of how to beat an inevitable death. if one's idea of dying proud is fighting to the end, then that is their choice.
953 words
Read More
The Right to Physician Assisted Suicide
analytical essay
The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians are also divided on the issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide.When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the united states.
- Opines that medical technology is science's greatest gift to mankind, but for the terminally ill, it is just a means of prolonging suffering.
- Explains that medical technology has failed to save a loved-one, but the cost is sometimes too much for the terminally ill's family.
- Explains that the right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the united states.
- Opines that medical technology is science's greatest gift to mankind, but for the terminally ill, it is just a means of prolonging suffering.
- Explains that medical technology has failed to save a loved-one, but the cost is sometimes too much for the terminally ill's family.
- Opines that terminally ill patients should be allowed to die with dignity. choosing the right to assisted suicide would be a final exercise of autonomy for the dying.
- Argues that the hippocratic oath cannot be used to deny the right to assisted suicide.
- Argues that the doctor-patient relationship would encourage distrust if assisted suicide was legalized.
- Explains that stephen reinhardt's ruling is the strongest defense for the right to assisted suicide.
- Opines that the right to assisted suicide must be freely bestowed upon terminally ill people. this would allow them to leave with dignity, save their families from financial ruin, and relieve them of insufferable pain.
- Explains cotton, paul, "medicine's position is both pivotal and precarious in assisted suicide debate." the journal of the american association.
- Analyzes smith, cheryl, "should active euthanasia be legalized: yes." american bar association journal april 1993.
1874 words
Read More
Ethical Issues With Physician Assisted Suicide
explanatory essay
The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are both emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death. If you take a moment and imagine how you would choose to live your last day, it is almost guaranteed that it wouldn’t be a day spent lying in a hospital bed, suffering in pain, continuously being pumped with medicine, and living in a strangers’ body. Today we live in a culture that denies the terminally ill the right to maintain control over when and how to end their lives. Physicians-assisted suicide “is the voluntary termination of one's own life by the administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Medical Definition of Physician-Assisted Suicide, 2017). Physician-assisted
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death.
- Explains that life-sustaining procedures such as ventilators, feeding tubes, and treatments for infectious and terminal diseases have positively influenced modern medicine, but inadvertently cause terminal patients extensive pain and suffering.
- Explains that the discussion of physician-assisted suicide is often focused around the ethical implications. the patient has given consent to the physician to ethically aid in their death.
- Explains that the ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death.
- Explains that life-sustaining procedures such as ventilators, feeding tubes, and treatments for infectious and terminal diseases have positively influenced modern medicine, but inadvertently cause terminal patients extensive pain and suffering.
- Explains that the discussion of physician-assisted suicide is often focused around the ethical implications. the patient has given consent to the physician to ethically aid in their death.
- Explains that euthanasia is divided into two separate classifications, namely passive and active. active and physician-assisted suicide share many of the same characteristics but differ in the role for committing the final act.
- Explains that physician-assisted suicide is legalized in six out of the fifty states in america, but there are additional states that have death with dignity laws.
824 words
Read More
Persuasive Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide
analytical essay
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing competent patients with a prescription for medication to use with the primary intention of ending their own life.
- Explains that assisted suicide has been a debate for many years, and is still heavily going.
- Explains that aids is a severe loss of the body's cellular immunity, greatly lowering the resistance to infection and malignancy.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing competent patients with a prescription for medication to use with the primary intention of ending their own life.
- Explains that assisted suicide has been a debate for many years, and is still heavily going.
- Explains that aids is a severe loss of the body's cellular immunity, greatly lowering the resistance to infection and malignancy.
- Explains that assisted suicide can relieve the patient and stop them from suffering. if a patient is terminally ill and will not get better, it allows them to end all of it. the patient deserves to choose whether they want to keep fighting or if they cannot go further.
- Explains that 70% of the 676 physicians who responded to a survey agreed that terminally ill patients should be able to ask for active euthanasia and 45% said they would assist if it was legal.
- Explains that assisted suicide gives the patient peace of mind of being able to end their life when they are ready.
- Argues that assisted suicide is not humane, but it is the patient's choice to do it.
- Argues that assisted suicide is a grave violation of the law of god, since it's the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of human life.
- Argues that physician assisted suicide helps end suffering and gives peace of mind even though many argue it's not humane. dying is not a crime.
1888 words
Read More
Medical Ethics
analytical essay
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the ethics of physician-assisted suicide is a continually debated topic. justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for pas.
- Argues that daniel callahan, author of when self-determination runs amok, is against any social policy that would allow pas to be practiced.
- Analyzes callahan's opposition to the belief that the essence of human dignity is the notion that a person should be free to choose how and when they want to die.
- Explains that the ethics of physician-assisted suicide is a continually debated topic. justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for pas.
- Argues that daniel callahan, author of when self-determination runs amok, is against any social policy that would allow pas to be practiced.
- Analyzes callahan's opposition to the belief that the essence of human dignity is the notion that a person should be free to choose how and when they want to die.
- Explains that the ethics of physician-assisted suicide is a continually debated topic. justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for pas.
- Argues that daniel callahan, author of when self-determination runs amok, is against any social policy that would allow pas to be practiced.
- Analyzes callahan's opposition to the belief that the essence of human dignity is the notion that a person should be free to choose how and when they want to die.
776 words
Read More
Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Case Study Analysis
analytical essay
There are many legal and ethical issues when discussing the topic of physician-assisted suicide (PAS). The legal issues are those regarding numerous court cases over the past few decades, the debate over how the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution comes into play, and the legalization vs. illegalization of this practice. The 14th Amendment states, “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (U.S. Const. amend. XIV, §1). PAS in the past has been upheld as illegal due to the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment of the constitution, but in recent years this same 14th amendment is also part of the reasoning for legalizing PAS, “nor shall any State deprive any person of…liberty” (U.S. Const. amend. XIV, §1). The ethical issues surrounding this topic include a patient’s autonomy and dignity and if PAS should be legalized everywhere. This paper is an analysis of the PAS debate and explores these different issues using a specific case that went to the supreme courts called Washington et al. v. Glucksberg et al.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the legal and ethical issues surrounding physician-assisted suicide (pas) using a specific case that went to the supreme courts.
- Explains that there are many moral and ethical issues surrounding the topic of suicide and therefore pas.
- Explains that the government has the commitment to protect all human life, regardless of one's physical, emotional, or mental state. in washington et al. v. glucksberg, the state has an important role in preventing suicide.
- Analyzes the legal and ethical issues surrounding physician-assisted suicide (pas) using a specific case that went to the supreme courts.
- Explains that there are many moral and ethical issues surrounding the topic of suicide and therefore pas.
- Explains that the government has the commitment to protect all human life, regardless of one's physical, emotional, or mental state. in washington et al. v. glucksberg, the state has an important role in preventing suicide.
- Explains that pas is an emotional debate that has been addressed in the courts repeatedly.
- Explains how the washington et al. v. glucksberg case was ruled constitutional to uphold pas as illegal.
- Explains that the nursing code of ethics states that it is important to maintain the integrity of the profession and to continue to promote health and safety for all patients.
- States that oregon legalized pas in 1994 and required all data to be documented and reported to the state.
- Argues that the slippery slope argument becomes a moral problem when pas is concerned to be the gateway to euthanasia. oregon passed the death with dignity act in 1997.
- Explains that autonomy and dignity are the two most influential aspects for the argument to support pas and are moral dilemmas that most people face sometime in their life.
- Agrees with the supreme court's decision of passing the death with dignity act. terminally ill mentally competent adults should have the liberty to decide when and how they will die.
1833 words
Read More