Medea Vs Salome Analysis

2058 Words5 Pages

Euripides’ Medea and Oscar Wilde’s Salome are two plays that explain the conflict between women and men, and the love under the patriarchal society.The characters Medea and Salome have many different in revenge but both have tragic love in patriarchal society. By comparing these two plays, it will shows how character’s tragic love in Medea and Salome blame patriarchal society.
Medea and Salome both have a tragic love indifferent ways which cause them to begin their revenge. In Medea, Medea was betrayed by her husband--Jason, so she choose revenge Jason by making him childless and poison the princess who he is going to marry with. “I will send them to her, bearing gifts in hand -a silicate robe [...]who touched her, will die a painful death. …show more content…

“You hateful thing, O woman most detested by the gods, by me, by all mankind-you dared to strike you children [...] I wish you would die”(Medea 820). Jason very hates Medea, when she makes a revenge on him. In his speech, he talks about all the men are going to hate Medea because of what she did. There is a strong conscious in Jason’s mind which is the men is like the god to the women. Jason thinks Medea need to pay all of duty in anything that happen to him.
Salome kills Iokanaan because love. After Salome gets Iokanaan’ head, Herod begins to blame her. “Herod: She is monstrous, thy daughter; I tell thee she is monstrous. In truth, what she has done is a great crime” (Salome 21). Herod is the one who has desire on Salome, but when Salome did something he do not agreed with, he begins to curse her. He think Salome is a monster because she has done a trouble; she kills the holy man. Although Herod is the person who cause the dead of Iokanaan indirect, he puts the duty on Salome.
Medea and Salome both have a tragic love in the patriarchal society. Although the noble family has given them more rights than other women in patriarchal society, they still are

Open Document