Mccarthyism Vs Crucible

860 Words2 Pages

In Arthur Miller’s “Why I Wrote The Crucible,” he parallels the Salem Witch Trials and the Second Red Scare to criticize the prosecution of suspected Communists in the latter. During the Red Scare conservative politicians, most notably Senator Joseph McCarthy, claimed that Communists had infiltrated the United States government. They used the resulting hysteria as well as hearsay accusations to mar their opponents’ reputations. Likewise, in Miller’s The Crucible, spectral evidence – which is a claim from the witness that the offender’s spirit has harmed them – is used to convict potential witches during their trials. Throughout these two works, Miller effectively links the witch trials to the hearings of accused Communists during the Red Scare and defends his modification of history except about the creation of Abigail Williams and John Proctor’s affair. …show more content…

This is exemplified by Judge Danforth in The Crucible: “… who may be a witness of [witchcraft]? The witch and the victim. … Now we cannot hope the witch will accuse herself; granted? Therefore, we must rely upon her victims–and they do testify, the children certainly do testify. … I think I have made my point?” (100). This correlates with the trials of alleged Communists, whose confessions of innocence were ignored and who were condemned regardless of their testimony. Moreover, in both time periods, the accused could avoid punishment by revealing the names of other Communists or witches. This resulted in many of the accused revealing the names of innocent people to avoid their own

Open Document