Max Weber's Theory Of Social Action

1637 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why did Weber study social action

In this case, power has been given to the police to arrest people and investigate into their cases hence Weber called this process a social action. For Max Weber, social action has been a way to bring people together. “Weber claims that subjective attitude constitutes social action only so far as they oriented to the behavior of others. For example, religious behavior is not social if it is simply a matter of contemplation or solitary prayer. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: Univ. of California Pr. He claimed that people can be in the closet to perform their religious act which will not hinder anyone and at the same time can be in a public to perform the same act which will hinder people. He was trying to explain how certain actions and conditions …show more content…

W. (1959). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press. He made an example trying to use the timing of one’s needs when an order is being made at an appropriate time and an example is no one can buy winter coats when the season is vice versa, In this case, every action come with a consequence. He was able to give different types of situations like subjective attitude, action condition by the crowd, instrumentally rational,(zweckrational), value-rational (wertrational), affectional, traditional. Max Weber in one of his theories explains how power has been given to certain class who control the

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Karl Marx And Max Weber

    185 Words  | 1 Pages

    America is supposedly where all men are created equally, yet society has created a hierarchy based on socioeconomic standing and political power. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber has applied their theories of social class on the model of social stratification; a system in which society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. According to Karl Marx, the main classes of society are the bourgeoisie and the proletariat; those that are the owners of the means of productions and those who work for it. On the other hand, Max Weber argued that there is a multidimensional ranking rather than a hierarchy of clearly defined class. America has created a social system in which those of middle and lower classes tend to struggle to decrease the gap within

    Read More

  • Summary: Marx Weber's Theory In Capitalist Modernity

    1928 Words  | 4 Pages

    Marx Weber was one of the greatest theorist in history. In his work we can see how his thinking about rationality has developed and what impact it has on the modern society. Marx in his work showed a relationship between production, exchange and raises questions about social class, culture and self-identity. To answer the question why Marx`s claim that in capitalist modernity `all that is solid melts into air” I will look at history of class conflict, what makes the bourgeoisie a revolutionary class and the role of exploitation. Also I will look at changes from feudalism to capitalism and what are the implication of this `melting` process for modern society.

    Read More

  • How Class Influences Identities

    393 Words  | 1 Pages

    Weber's theory also identified economic category as important in defining class structures, but rather than focusing on class divisions he focused on the individual and their opportunities. Weber picks out the significant thing here, that both classes will meet in a market. The ruling or privilege class as purchaser of labour and as a vendor. The working or vulnerable class as someone who must sell his services or starve.

    Read More

  • Weber’s Inquisitive Ethos Built on the Shoulders of Marxist Capitalist Theory

    1583 Words  | 4 Pages

    Weber and Marx have both written accounts on the rise of capitalism and the bourgeoisie class in an attempt to understand the resulting inequalities that still exist today. Weber has criticised the work of Marx, citing how limited it is use a purely economic framework, labelled as historical materialism, instead of looking at all factors within society (Weber 2001: 20). Weber provides evidence and conclusions that mirror Marx, suggesting that his criticism is faulty. First, both writers recognise an inequality between the poor and rich resulting from the rise of capitalism and the bourgeoisie (Marx and Engels 2008: 34-36; Weber 2001: 28-30). Second, they both suggest broader systems of delusion meant to normalise the exploitation of the worker, and validate the gains of the bourgeoisie (Marx and Engels 2008: 38-40; Weber 2001: 24-27). Third, both authors refer to the development of systems that divides workers and suppresses their ability to deviate from or break capitalism (Marx and Engels 2008: 44; Weber 2001: 19; 115). Therefore, Weber’s criticism of Marx is only partially correct. Marx actually discusses social, political, and even moral elements despite both authors believing that The Communist Manifesto is solely about economics; the overlap between their conclusions shows demonstrates such variety. Weber’s work is superior though because he integrates examples of religion and morals to further support these points: the oppressive systems of capitalism and the persistent class antagonisms. Disproving even Marx’s own identity as an economist, Weber’s argument is marginally superior because it uses morality to elaborate on Marx’s seemingly-economic conclusions regarding the rise of bourgeois capitalism.

    Read More

  • Marx And Weber's Theory Of Social Mistutiation

    1576 Words  | 4 Pages

    and the opportunities of income, and (3) the casual component is represented under the condition of the commodity or about market (‘class situations’)” (p.138).

    Read More

  • Max Weber: Contextual Analysis

    491 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his book The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, Max Weber analyzes the influence of the Protestantism guide line on capitalism spirit. Since all human work is not parfait, Max Weber’s book contain strength and weakness.

    Read More

  • Marx Vs. Weber And Weber's Theory Of Capitalism

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    statues tried to lengthen it by compulsion” ( Section 5 SFNWO ). Marx argued that capitalism withhold the economy and create a recession and collapse of the economy. Industrial and factory working class has to work and be dependent on their employers because they don’t own land and capital (10/16).

    Read More

  • Economic Class And Max Weber's Concept Of Socioeconomic Class

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    I can still recall the realtor’s squeamish smile and politely scrutinizing voice when my mother and I were at an open house in Greenfield, “You’re from there? Oh, well this may be out of your price range.” Growing up in the east side of Indianapolis, or what many tend to refer to as the ghetto, it was very difficult to move to the suburbs in Greenfield. Not simply due to conforming to their norms, rather, facing the stigma of residents who believed I was in a lower socioeconomic class than their “perfected nuclear families”. In all reality, my family is in the working-­middle class, yet when we first entered the quaint (dull) Greenfield area, as soon as my family discussed our initial area of residency people would automatically leer and place

    Read More

  • Karl Weber's Views Of Max Weber And Karl Marx

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    Max Weber and Karl Marx, two prolific Sociologists who share different views with the origins and development of modern capitalism. They wanted to understand the rise of capitalism, the causes of it, as well as the direction it was heading. As they started to dissect capitalism they developed two separate conclusions generated from completely different factors. It’s hard to fathom the fact that Weber and Marx could arrive at two distinct conclusions while studying a similar event. They took two separate angles of approach, which caused them to have to opposing theories. Due too Weber and Marx approaching capitalism from different angles, their views of the dynamics, and the understanding of the origins differed.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Karl Marx and Max Weber

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologists. Both of them tried to explain social change taking place in a society at that time. On the one hand, their views are very different, but on the other hand, they had many similarities.

    Read More

  • Social Class

    785 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shortell, Timothy. "Weber's Theory of Social Class." Weber's Theory of Social Class. Brooklyn College, n.d. Web.

    Read More

  • Trouble at City Zoo Case Study

    3705 Words  | 8 Pages

    Raven, Bertram, and John French. Jr. "Legitimate Power, Coercive Power, and Observability in Social Influence ." Sociometry Vol. 21.No. 2 (1958): 83. Web. 2 Aug 2010. .

    Read More

  • Weber vs. Marx

    1308 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... be used to promote one’s status. An influential politician, for example, has a lot of power not because he has money, but because his decisions impact society at large and play a very important role in governing the lives of others.                                                             Weber notes that although bureaucratic rationalization has disenchanted the world and its endurance seems inevitable, the spirit has not been completely eradicated. Weber believes that as an advanced society we cannot escape the pattern of rational rules and laws. However, he allows for the arrival of prophets or charismatic people from time to time, those who exhibit good rational administration skills as well as heart and passion. While offering no clear solution, Weber leaves us with an optimistic hope for the future and inspiration, perhaps, to emulate those extraordinary leaders of our time.

    Read More

  • Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Simmel: The Relationship between Society and the Individual

    3473 Words  | 7 Pages

    Each of the four classical theorists Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Simmel had different theories of the relationship between society and the individual. It is the objective of this paper to critically evaluate the sociological approaches of each theory to come to a better understanding of how each theorist perceived such a relationship and what it means for the nature of social reality.

    Read More

  • Weber's Thoughts on Social Action

    1820 Words  | 4 Pages

    Weber believes each society is different and comes up with ideal typical constructs to explain a certain society. His starting point for his theory is meaningful social action. Weber believes that humans are naturally valuing beings who carry certain values and interpret natural and social factors based on their values. Humans are conscious creatures who attach meaning towards an act which is directed towards another individual. Weber is concerned with social action, its subjective meaning and the unintended consequences of the actions. According to Weber, structure is a result of action which in return affects the individuals who are responsible for setting up the structure.

    Read More

More about Max Weber's Theory Of Social Action

Open Document