Introduction
“Certainly, all historical experience confirms the truth - that man would not have attained the possible unless time and again he had reached out for the impossible” (Quotes, 2016). Although today, Max Weber is now considered to be predominately a sociologist, his early career held interests in mostly history, though his “scholarship ranged across jurisprudence, political science, economics, sociology, comparative religion, the philosophy of history, and the histories of several nations and half a dozen civilizations, both ancient and modern” (Coser, 1970). An intellect in my areas, Weber is considered one of the most influential thinkers in the field of sociology. Throughout his sociological research and works, Weber’s focus
…show more content…
“His father, Max, pursued a dual career, as head of the Berlin building department and as a National Liberal representative in the Reichstag and the Prussian Parliament” (Radkau, 2013). His mother, Helen, “did volunteer work for relief of the poor” (Radkau, 2013) and raised eight children, with Max being the oldest. Conflict between Weber’s mother and father due to their differing lifestyles and religious beliefs has been said to have influenced Weber’s intellectual and psychological development. Weber’s mother was a devout Calvinist, and her husband’s social life caused a distance between the two as Max enjoyed earthly pleasure and Helene sought to lead an ascetic life. Helen was concerned with the imperfections she saw in her life. These imperfections, she believed, were signs that she was not destined for salvation (Ritzer & Stepnisky, 2013). Upon the death of two of her children, Helene entered a long period where she struggled with her grief. Her husband disdained at her prolonged grief which only lead to an increasing strain between the husband and wife. Requiring absolute obedience from his wife and children, Weber’s father structured his home in a traditional authoritarian manner. “It is thought that this bleak home environment, marked by conflicts between Weber’s parents, contributed to the inner agonies that haunted Weber in his adult life” (Mitzman, …show more content…
There he studied law, philosophy, history, and economics before leaving to serve a year in the military at Strassburg. During his time in the military, Weber became involved with the family of his mother’s sister, Ida Baumgarten, and her husband, historian Hermann Baumgarten. It is said that Weber’s father found this relationship troublemaking, and requested his son return to finish his studies in Berlin. Weber began his studies at the University of Berlin in 1884 while living with his parents. During this time, Weber was financially dependent on his father, which he disliked. This would place a great amount of tension between the father and son. It was during this time that Weber became closer to his mother, adopting her ascetic lifestyle and rigid work habits. After passing the bar in 1886 and gaining his Ph.D. in 1889, Weber gained his first position in the academic world. He married a distant cousin, Marianne Schnitger, in 1893 and in 1894 Weber gained a temporary teaching position at Freiburg University teaching jurisprudence. His temporary position became a permanent one, when he became a full professor in 1895, teaching political economy at Freidburg. He then returned to Heidelberg to teach political economy in 1896, also as a full
Helene Melanie Lebel, one of two daughters born to a Jewish family, was raised as a Catholic in Vienna. Her father died during World War I when Helene was only 5 years old, and when Helene was 15, her mother remarried. Helene entered law school, but at age 19, she started showing signs of an illness. By 1935, her illness became so bad severe that she had to give up her law studies. Helene was diagnosed with Schizophrenia and was placed in Vienna’s Steinhof Psychiatric Hospital. Although her condition improved in 1940, Helene was forced to stay in Steinhof. Her parents believed she would soon be released, but in August, her mother was informed that Helene was transferred to Niedernhart. She was actually transported to Brandenburg, Germany where she was led into a gas chamber or room? disguised as a shower room, and was gassed to death. Helene was listed as dying in her room of “acute schizophrenic excitement”.
Emile Durkheim is largely credited as the man who made Sociology a science. As a boy, he was enraptured by the scientific approach to society, but at that time, there was no social science curriculum. Vowing to change this, Durkheim worked scrupulously to earn his “degree in philosophy in 1882”. (Johnson 34) Unable to change the French school system right away, Emile traveled to Germany to further his education. It was there that he published his initial findings and gained the knowledge necessary to influence the French education system. Emile Durkheim is a distinguished and well versed man who, through his work, established a platform for other sociologist to build on.
Shortell, Timothy. "Weber's Theory of Social Class." Weber's Theory of Social Class. Brooklyn College, n.d. Web.
In sociology, there are three names you will always hear, Marx, Weber, and Durkheim. Each are successful sociologist, they have made many significant contributions to the development of sociology. While all being enlightenment thinkers, each of them have their own distinguish perspective and focuses in their respective theories. Durkheim, a structural functionalist, argued everything in society exist for a purpose, and that society are bounded together by ideas and social unity, social solidarity. Weber focused on rationality and bureaucracy, he believes they are key element to modern society and he is interested to understand how people feel. Marx is primarily study society with economic perspectives, focused heavily on inequality among classes
Bourdieu transforms Max Weber’s notion of domination and social orders into his theory of fields, defining field as a setting in which agents and their social positions are located, a system of social positions that are structured in terms of power relationships. Fields, so to speak, “provide themselves with agents equipped with the habitus needed to make them work”(1980, 67). Bourdieu thereby claims that society can be seen as the sum of social objective relationships in the conditions of economic production and that it is the social agent should be emphasized in society. Bourdieu, although retaining structuralist concepts of social structures, argues that the reproduction of social structure is not constrained by the logic of social structure.
Gluckel's memoir enables a reader to gain an understanding of what a widowed Jewish woman would face in Christian dominated Germany both from a personal and public perspective throughout seventeenth and eighteenth century. Throughout her memoirs Gluckel describes the worries that a mother would have over her children, her relations with both her first and second husband while addressing the responsibilities she faced as a businesswoman. Gluckel arranged her life narrative in seven books. The first four books and the opening section of the fifth book have been written consecutively in the months or year of mourning after Haim's (her first husbands) death in 1689. The rest of Book 5 was written during the decade of the 1690's but given final form after her second marriage. The sixth book was written in 1702 or shortly afterward, during the initial shock of Hirsch Levy's (Gluckel's second husbands) bankruptcy in Metz, and the seventh and final book was composed in 1715, during her second widowhood, with a final paragraph from 1719 before her death. Gluckel has conveniently broken down her narratives in seven books, which help the reader clearly identify with individual aspects occurring in her life. In her memoirs Gluckel thoroughly encompasses a social, cultural and economical perspective about her life as a Jewish woman while contrasting it to Christian ways which dominated Germany during both 17th and 18th century.
Emile Durkheim and Max Weber both appealed to me in the reading of chapter 1. They both have similarities and differences on their approaches to sociology. While reading the background of Emile, I found it fascinating how he studied sociology in a way that he put together the individual dimensions and added them together to better understand a society or social group. The case of suicide rates and religion. This one case can be analyzed through other elements, such as careers. For instance, the type of profession can be studied. I am really into statistics and like to break down information. The way he broke down the information to analyze a society or social groups interested me. Max Weber, I chose to write about because I felt he had a refined understanding of his teacher, Karl Marx.
Three years after Nelly had passed away, she still appeared to have business with the world of the living. The specter’s primary objective was to arrange the marriage of Georg...
Appelrouth, Scott, and Laura Desfor Edles. Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory: Text and Readings . Edition 2. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press, 2012. 256-654. Print.
Morrison, K. (2006) Mark, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of Modern Social Thought. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
While sociologists have often studied social change, Max Weber was particularly focused on understanding the progression of rationalization. Many of his works detail his analysis of the growth of rationality in the Western world, as well as the development of bureaucracies as a sign of this process. Although his argument that the modern world is marked by an increase in both does provide a valuable and multifaceted view, it does have its problems. Namely, Weber’s conceptualization of rationality fails to properly separate the different forms, which weakens his subsequent argument on the growth of rationality. In contrast, Weber is highly effective in determining the characteristics of bureaucracies, which allows for a strong discussion on increasing bureaucratization.
Weber focused more on the “individual rather than the collective whole” (Craig Calhoun 2012, 267). Max Weber regarded scientific knowledge of society and culture as a one side fact of evidence to support it. The individualness of things not support by just the “nature of things” but by the one who seeks out the information themselves. Weber 's conception of sociological explanation is rooted in his notions of interpretation and the ideal type. Weber, approaching social science in a manner which allowed him to escape the pitfalls of historicism, attempted to devise procedures to permit more generalizable inferences than historians typically permitted themselves. When it comes to discussing social classes, Weber emphasized that there are two major factors to remember: power and financial status. Social class is not an efficient way for one to protect their position or wealth in a society because it is all market based. The alternative to social classes are Status groups. They have a better chance of unified collective actions, they “express the fact that above all else a specific style of life is expected from all those who wish to belong to the circle” (Craig Calhoun 2012, 315). Weber saw a fundamental problem of modern society as a weakness in capitalism, however unlike Marx, it is the process of rationalization and the increase of bureaucracies that bring a threat to creativity and the idea of
Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber are all important characters to be studied in the field of Sociology. Each one of these Sociological theorists, help in the separation of Sociology into its own field of study. The works of these three theorists is very complex and can be considered hard to understand but their intentions were not. They have their similarities along with just as many of their differences.
Max Weber had much to say about the organization of capitalism and the disparity of the system, but unlike others, Weber also paid a lot of attention to the traditional, non-monetary incentives underlying social action. Weber wrote extensively about religion, though both he and Durkheim had a functional perspective on religion. Weber was more concerned with the functional perspective of religion while Durkheim focused particularly on how social order was possible within a religious context. Weber’s idea of the iron cage was significant as he believed that society was no longer driven by non- physical conception, such as religious values but instead by economic interests. He believed that work shouldn’t be just our occupation and inclination; Weber believe that the strains of our capitalist society has become so prevalent and governing that we are forced into fulfilling rational costs to benefit the expectations of the capitalist marketplace. Thus Max Weber asserts that in order to relinquish rational control we must live in this so called iron cage for the greater good on society. “Furthermore the puritans believed that fate decreed that the cloak should become an iron cage” (lecture November 6, 2013)[Footnote]. He further stated these ideal were that material goods have gained an increasing and ultimately an unavoidable power. The material goods has contributed to keeping us trapped in this iron cage, and for many individuals it has become the rational choice to stay there, rather than to follow the values of religion. Weber would conclude that within our society today, we have given the attitude of involved reasonableness which pervades so many aspects of our lives and of our culture as a whole; creating an iron cage of econom...
Weber saw religion from a different perspective; he saw it as an agent for change. He challenged Marx by saying that religion was not the effect of some economical social or psychological factor. But that religion was used as a way for an explanation of things that cause other things. Because religious forces play an important role in reinforces our modern culture, Weber came to the conclusion that religion serves as both a cause and an effect. Weber didn’t prose a general theory of religion but focused on the interaction between society and religion. Weber believed that one must understand the role of religious emotions in causing ideal types such as capitalism. He explained the shift in Europe from the other worldliness of Catholicism to the worldliness of early Protestantism; according to Weber this was what initiated the capitalist economic system.