Master Slave Dialectics Summary

718 Words2 Pages

In Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectics it talks about two figures the master and the slave. This idea of the master and the slave is an abstract idea of two types of self-consciousness the "master self-consciousness" and the "slave self-consciousness". In every society there has always been powerless and powerful people, dominant and submissive. Hegel suggests that these classifications were not created ahead of time but were the qualities we recognized in others. Some social groups in society like minority groups, for example may demonstrate these passive characteristics. But we made them submissive because of our failure to recognize them with respect and that alone can make them independent. Hegel starts by claiming that each one of us is in a struggle to understand who I am, we need to get recognition from others to exist as independent and free people. We need to realize that to be free, we need others to recognize that we are worthy of being a free person. So in this relationship we try to force others to respect …show more content…

Many of these undervalued groups take the part of the slave consciousness in the master/slave relationship. These groups for the most part have been very submissive until recent years. For years we made these groups submissive because we failed to recognize them with respect. But now just like the slave in Hegel's dialectic these groups today are standing up against their masters the population, men, the upper-class, and heterosexual people. I think that these groups still need to continue to struggle for recognition in order to achieve a healthy self-identity. In the western society many of these groups in terms of the master/slave dialectic these minority groups are becoming more recognized by the master but in eastern society many of these minority groups are degraded by their master

Open Document