Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the boston massacre
An essay on the boston massacre
Narrative of boston massacre analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Boston Massacre was a street fight between the patriots and British troops that happened on March 5, 1770. It is remembered as an important event that helped gain America’s Independence. The riot was about the disagreement the settlers of America had on the Townshend Act. The Townshend Act was an act passed by the British ruler and it was about taxing on everything except tea. The Americans disapproved of the act, they believed it was an abuse of power. The Boston Massacre resulted in public protest and threats against Britain’s Townshend Act. During the Boston Massacre, there were five deaths. The town demanded a trial for Captain Preston and his men for murder. John Adam and Josiah Quincy the second were on the British side and didn’t believe
The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines massacre as “the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty” or “a cruel or wanton murder” (m-w.com). Essentially a massacre results in either the death of many people or death by cruel means. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770, in Boston, Massachusetts and involved American colonists and British troops. The colonists, upset by recent laws enacted by the British, taunted a smaller group of British soldiers by throwing snowballs at them (Boston Massacre Historical Society). In response, the soldiers fired upon the unarmed colonists leaving five people dead and six wounded (Phelan, 131). Even though the event in Boston on March 5, 1770, in which blood was shed, and called the Boston Massacre, the actions which took place on that day did not constitute a massacre. Since only five people were killed and six wounded and there was no evidence of cruelty, the name Boston Massacre was likely a propaganda ploy by Samuel Adams to rally the colonists against the British instead of a true massacre.
March 5, 1770, the day it all happened...The day the Boston Massacre happened. The day the colonists and soldiers decided they would attack each other. No one to this day really knows who’s fault it was we just know who was blamed for it all. I believe it was the colonists fault, They did everything that would make the british soldiers fire. It was not an accident.
The night of March 5th in Boston, Massachusetts took place was a horrific massacre brought on by the british soldiers. The British were not happy about the Americans decision to rebel against the new changes being made for Americans. The American Colonists rebel against the British because the colonists had been denied their rights. Prior to the night of the Massacre the british had also put in place multiple new taxes on the American colonies, these changes that were established were the result of this terrible massacre.
On March 5, 1770 the Boston Massacre, also known as the Incident on King Street by the British, heightened the tension in the already hostile colonies. The Boston
One act of tyranny by the British was the Boston Massacre. The colonists did not like that British soldiers were stationed in Boston. They were there to enforce the Townshend Acts and they could search the colonists house at any time for any reason. The colonists did not like that. The British soldiers also took the jobs of the colonists. The colonists responded to this by a rebellion. They were gathered around a group of soldiers. “…a fistfight broke out over jobs.” (Danzer 206) They were yelling and fighting. “Instantly three or four of the soldiers fired and then three more fired in the same confusion.” (Sheffield Stanford edu) The soldiers ended up shooting and killing five colonists. This was one act of tyranny, the Boston Massacre.
Brandon Bowers Although many historians believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of murder, it is
Imagine a powerful organization from a different place coming into your town taking your jobs, destroying your possessions and telling you what you can and can't do. This is what the British were doing to the colonists during the time of the Boston massacre. The Boston Massacre was a conflict that happened on March 5th 1770. It happened near the courthouse in front of the church on a street called King Street. British soldiers had shot at a group of colonists killing 5 of them. Some think it was the British to blame for this tragedy but others think it was the colonists fault for this event.
The word massacre means to deliberately and violently kill a large number of people. This describes the British actions towards the colonists. The colonists themselves never had any real weapons, and never actually killed, or initiated the killing of anyone. According to many of the sources including “Report in the Boston Gazette and County journal, March
On the day of March 5, 1770, British soldiers opened fire on a group of colonists in boston, killing five men, including Crispus Attucks, Samuel Maverick, Patrick Carr, Samuel Gray, and James Caldwell. This event would soon be known as the Boston massacre. There were many factors that led to this shooting, most from the colonists of Boston, who were provoking the soldiers by attacking them and throwing objects at the soldiers, and also could have made the British troops to panic by closing in on them.
On March 5, 1770, an event occurred in Boston, which consisted of British troops shooting upon colonists. People refer to this as a massacre, but they only look at one side of the story. The Boston Massacre in 1770 was not really a massacre, but a mutual riot (Boston Massacre History Society). British soldiers went to America to keep the people of Boston in order. However, the soldier's presence there was not welcomed by the Bostonians and this made things worse (Boston Massacre History Society). The British had to fire their guns because the Bostonians were antagonizing the soldiers, which caused five people to die. The Bostonians made the soldiers feel threatened so in turn they acted in self-defense. The British soldiers and their Captain had to go through a trial, to prove they were not to blame for what had occurred.
Before the Boston Massacre even occurred, tensions were high in the city of Boston between the Bostonians and the British. At this time people were just getting over the Stamp Act and were now angered by the new taxes also known as the Townshend Duties. This new tax caused Bostonians to become more aggressive causing the British to send more soldiers to impose the laws of Parliament and to restore order among the people. The arrival of more soldiers only caused more of an uproar between the people of Boston and the red coats. Bostonians went out of their way to harass British soldiers whenever they got the chance, but on March 5, 1770 both sides acted unacceptably resulting in the Boston Massacre (84-85).
The scene in the painting reminds me of what happened at 1770, the Boston Massacre. In this piece however it seems that the group of people were trying to escape being forced to convert to a different religion hence the church and were caught by the guardsmen, which led to some of the people being shot and killed, or it could have been the total opposite maybe the people were trying to go into the church but the guardsmen didn’t want them too and those who retaliated were shot on site. It seems like the people are being interrogated at gunpoint, a reason as to why I’m not sure might have something to do with the church, it could have been that the people were seeking shelter at the church from these soldier in the black hats, and once the people
The Boston Massacre was a very big event in the history of the United States, some call it the “spark” of the American Revolution. I believe that the actions of the British soldiers should not be considered as an accident for a few reasons, my first reason being how long the shooting was drawn out, most people use the taunting that the colonist used as the main reason this was an accident, but if it was accidental fire, why did they let all soldiers fire without trying to stop them once. My second reason is the amount of power the colonist had compared to the soldiers, the colonist mostly being armed with only snowballs, or clubs along with anything else that was small and throwable, while the soldiers were fully armed with rifles. My last reason that I believe the soldiers were intentional
The Boston Massacre was one the most controversial massacre in American history that teased the coming of the American Revolution. People were taunting a British soldier who was standing “in front of the Boston Custom House” who got very frustrated to the point where he hit somebody. The soldier got overwhelmed by people who came after he hit one of them, called help from his fellow soldiers. When Captain Preston and his soldiers arrived at the scene, people were coming from everywhere, some were trying to fight them and some were just there to watch. Then, one of the soldier shot at the people and his fellow soldiers started shooting after, which killed five people. This what ended it up being called the Boston Massacre. Some might say that the murderer were the soldiers who shot the people, but the real murderer is
On March 5, 1770, five colonists lost their lives in what American history would deem their fight for liberty; however, several British soldiers were placed on trial for murder when they were only fighting for their lives against an anger mob. John Adams, who would become our second president, defended these soldiers in an attempted to prove their innocents. The trial was held on American soil and the outcome did not fare well for the British soldiers. Adams was able to keep them from receiving the death penalty, however both soldiers were “branded” for life as murders. Boston was a cauldro...