Marriage and family therapists Gary and Joy Lundberg’s article on the Family share website argues why it is important for couples to have children. Gary and Joy’s mission is to strengthen marriages and families worldwide through their books, music and family counselling business. The article “Why couples need to have kids” addresses why the reasons for couples, especially young ones, need to have children. The article states that there are practical reasons, emotional reasons and Biblical reasons for having children. In my opinion, I feel that a couple does not “need” to have children as the title of the article states. It is important for couples to privately decide whether they should have children or not. Each individual couple knows themselves and can determine if they are ready for children. The desire to have children is not in everyone and this article assumes so. The first argument in the article is the practical reasons for having children. The article lists reasons such as society counting on you and the elderly being without family in the future. To begin with, the argument that society counts on you should not be a major reason why couples should have children. It is true with the saying “it takes a village to raise a …show more content…
Firstly, for selfish reasons, the article states that although raising a child may be expensive and difficult, it will be the most rewarding thing for the couple. It gives the example of holding a newborn baby in your arms and having love for them. This does not include mothers that do not feel anything for their children right after they are born. The article does not consider the mothers that may have trouble bonding with their child immediately or at all. Another reason for having children is the desire your family to continue. This reason might not be a priority for everyone. Having a successor may not be important for every
The article could potentially be considered outdated because it was posted roughly ten years ago. On the website, the author suggests individuals should have better access to birth control, the “morning-after” pill, and proper sex education that could drastically change the number of unintended pregnancies. If this were to happen, it could increase the knowledge of sex, pregnancies, and how to prevent it; however, making young adults more knowledgeable does not mean that we will lower the number of pregnancies
explains that the cost of having a child is much more of a burden for the women of the
The Roaring Twenties were known as a time of economic boom, pop culture and social developments. This was a time when women began to break norms, they acted rebelliously such as wearing releveling clothing, smoking, and drinking. These women were known as “flappers” who wanted to change their roles in the 1920’s. Birth control activist, Margaret Sanger sought to change the world where women had access to a low cost, effective contraception pill. In “The Morality of Birth Control” Sanger battled opponents who claimed that contraception would cause women to become immoral. The author uses rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and fallacies to back up her claim while touching on issues in the church, advancements of women, and the source of disease in the world.
It is written in Genesis 1:27 that when God created man and woman, the Torah states that He created them in “His Image” (Gen. 1:27). Many Jewish Orthodox scholars conclude from this, that each human being has a powerful, inherent value. After God created man and woman, He commanded them to, “Be fruitful and multiply” (Gen. 1:28). The commandment of “Be fruitful and multiply” explains the importance of the religious responsibility of the Jewish people to have children.
This primary source raises an important question nowadays we now have access to Birth Control and women still have many children because they get government help but is it really necessary to have more than four children?
With all the different economic opportunities, it is no wonder some Americans see procreation as a supplemental source of monetary income. During the twentieth century, we propagated the American Dream and placed pressure on Americans to settle down and start families. Prior to the twentieth century, many couples would have children, who would often then become labor assets; children would tend the fields or do various jobs around the home to save the family money by avoiding outsourcing. As the population grew, the laws of supply and demand triggered a need for new technology; this technology made it easier to sustain the population but also made the need for the extra children obsolete. This did not stop Americans from breeding.
It is widely accepted that the birth of a child changes the parents’ marriage or relationship, but to what degree and to which areas of the relationship depend upon the individuals. One literature review by Cowan and Cowan, regarding the transition into parenthood, concluded that; changes that occur in parents’
In this time where science makes dreams feasible, and what years ago was saw to be difficult, now is promising, for this reason is okay and respectable when a traditional married couple try different methods to become parents. There are many treatments to solve this issue, such as in vitro fertilization, use of hormones, and the most new and revolutionary; ‘shop a gamete or baby’ the same as you shop for a car or a house; you can pick the color of the eyes, the color of the hair and the physique you want. Inside out is important to mention, all these treatments are not entirely effective. So what happens when all the resources are exhausted? The possibility to adopt a child who needs a family can be one of the best options, and the most valued accomplishment for this married couple. Scott Simon says “Many couples pay tens of thousands of dollars for rounds of medical wizardry instead of adopting children who are already among us, crying for our love and support” (The case for Adoption, par. 2). In America and other countries, the number of children waiting for the opportunity to be adopted by a family is immense; these children are waiting for someone to rescue them, hoping for love and safety before it is too late for them.
...e are now able to have children. Human beings have a deep and basic need to procreate, and if we can help to fulfill this need I believe that we should, we should just make sure we do so with the possible child’s best interest and future in mind as well.
Children should be seen as blessing from God, and god should decide when a couple
Mills, Claudia. "Are There Morally Problematic Reasons for Having Children?." Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 25.4 (2005): 2-9. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly. Web. 29 Nov. 2013.
Finally, Stuart Rachels discusses the objections that do not agree with his opinion. Some think that it is a disastrous result that people do not have children because the whole world may become aging and human beings may not exist anymore and others mention that to bear children is a natural thing for human beings (Rachels, 2013). Aimed at different objections, Rachels has given the explanation. For example, he claims that his opinion is just to say that people should not have children, but do not forbid people to have children. In other words, to have children depends on the economic situation of
As Dr. Michael Jarmulowicz stated, "All children should be born for their own sake, not as a purpose for someone else's benefit" (BBC News).
That’s like saying if you have legs you should run track. While yes you may have the ability to run and it may present good benefits to your health, if you don’t want to, you shouldn’t feel forced. In the essay, Rollin goes on to state that “The reality of motherhood can turn women into terrible people. And judging from the 50,000 cases of child abuse in the U.S. each year, some are worse than terrible.” Not every woman is cut out to be a mother because at the end of the day, you have to be willing to put your needs on hold for the sake of your child, and not everyone is capable of doing so. She also mentions that “Women have child bearing equipment. To choose not to use the equipment is no more blocking what is indistinctive than it is for a man who, muscles or no, chooses not to be a weightlifter.” Just because women have the ability to have children does not mean every woman is required to have one. Only one person should have a say in whether or not she should have a child and that person is herself. No husband, parent, or society should pressure her to make that
Research tells us--not that it is a surprise--there is a difference between the outcomes of a planned and wanted pregnancy compared to a mistimed or unwanted pregnancy. Specifically, many of those studies examine the risky behaviors and adverse experiences that are more common among women with mistimed pregnancies compared to those that are most common among women whose pregnancies were described as unwanted.