Marcia Kitchen Argumentative Essay

598 Words2 Pages

A Humboldt County judge ruled today there was enough evidence for Marcia Kitchen to stand trial for her alleged role in a 2016 fatal hit-and-run that left her daughter and daughter’s friend dead.
Judge John Feeney said there was sufficient cause to believe Marcia Kitchen might have been drunk when she allegedly struck the 14-year-old girls on Eel River Drive near the Fortuna city limits. Feeney held her to on one count of vehicular manslaughter without gross negligence and driving under the influence causing death. She also was held to answer for special allegations that included fleeing the scene and causing injury or death.
The ruling came at the end of the third day of a preliminary hearing regarding the July 12, 2016, fatal hit-and-run …show more content…

Defense attorney Benjamin Okin questioned Jevin Kitchen’s memory, noting portions of the incident the 18-year-old had recounted to investigators but could not recall during testimony. Jevin Kitchen conceded his memory of details was better about the time of the event and statements made early on were likely more accurate.
Jevin Kitchen had told investigators around the time of the incident that when his mom got home with her damaged Jeep she said she wasn’t immediately sure what she had hit.
“ ‘It was something big,’ ” Jevin Kitchen recalled his mom saying when shown a copy of his transcribed interview with law enforcement. “...The whole front bumper was messed up.”
The son’s description of William Stewart, a long-time friend of Marcia Kitchen who was in the Jeep with her at the time of the crash, seemed to misidentify the man. He had told police that the man looked like some kind of “San Diego gangster” and was “all tatted up.” Stewart testified Tuesday to having a single tattoo one of his biceps, according to a transcribed interview read by

More about Marcia Kitchen Argumentative Essay

Open Document