Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
explain the concept of ethics
role of ethics of ethics in society
explain the concept of ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: explain the concept of ethics
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy describes Levinasian philosophy as the concept of the “ethics of ethics” and explains Emmanuel Levinas’ philosophical concept of the face as a “call and command to ethical action.” These ethical tenets explore the notion of the face in its nudity and defenselessness signifies: “Do not kill me”; furthermore any exemplification of the face's expression carries with it this combination of resistance and defenselessness (Levinias). Although Lévinas' theory of the face bears resemblance to Martin Buber's "I and Thou" relation, Levinias’ focus of the “other” as an asymmetrical relationship that leads us to either “love it or kill it (Levinias 23).” According to Emmanuel Levinias “The face brings a notion of …show more content…
The Father and the child encounter slaves of other survivors who are killed for food and Paul Bäumer spends and artillery strike with a man whom he killed. The protagonists’ two encounters show the audience the two sides of the face, the gruesome and the glorious. When an enemy foot soldier falls into Paul’s shell hole, Paul “strikes madly at home” and wishes to “stop his mouth, stab him again” but “cannot any more lift [his] a hand against him.” As Paul Bäumer admits that it was his first “time [he] [had] killed with his hands” and becomes truly apologetic as he tries to clean and repair the man’s “three stab wounds” he shows the audience a version of Paul who was never corrupted by war and death. This insight into the psyche Paul Bäumer shows the extraordinarily good circumstances of the face in which the realization can prompt us to virtuousness and compassion. Paul Bäumer’s climaxes as a protagonist when he is at his weakest and most unsure; the audience realizes that Paul is truly shocked to the core as he states that “his hands are white at the knuckles” after the murder. In the hand-to-hand combat, similar to that of Greek epic heroes, Paul Bäumer discovers his hatred of war as he knows that he “did not want to kill [the soldier]” and laments that the masterminds of war “never tell us that you are poor devils like us.” As Paul Bäumer comes to terms with committing the slaughter of the enemy soldier, he begins to realize that there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for (Camus). Similarly, the Father experiences horrific human brutality, however unlike Paul, the Father did not inflict the pain. As the Father walked down the “ rough wooden steps” and into the “coldness and damp” of the dungeon
In the story “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, the reader is enlightened about a boy who was mentally and emotionally drained from the horrifying experiences of war. The father in the story knows exactly what the boy is going through, but he cannot help him, because everyone encounters his or her own recollection of war. “When their faces are contorted from sucking the cigarette, there is an unmistakable shadow of vulnerability and fear of living. That gesture and stance are more eloquent than the blood and guts war stories men spew over their beers” (Zabytko 492). The father, as a young man, was forced to reenact some of the same obligations, yet the father has learne...
...it may help us arrive at an understanding of the war situation through the eyes of what were those of an innocent child. It is almost unique in the sense that this was perhaps the first time that a child soldier has been able to directly give literary voice to one of the most distressing phenomena of the late 20th century: the rise of the child-killer. While the book does give a glimpse of the war situation, the story should be taken with a grain of salt.
The older generation had an artificial illusion of what war is and although Paul's generation, the soldiers, loved their country, they were forced to distinguish reality from illusion. Because of this disti...
The first person narrative in the ancient kingdom of Glome, a land ruled by a tyrannical king and religious goddess Ungit. Narrated by Princess (later Queen) Orual. The first section of this novel presents itself as an open complaint against the gods, particularly the god of the Grey Mountain, who brought Orual such pain and distress over the years, yet offer no answers or explanations to justify the suffering.
After he goes to ride the soldier, he his flung from his back and actually sees the soldier, “a face that lack a lower jaw – from upper teeth to the throat was a great red gap fringed with hanging shreds of flesh and splinters of bone.” (Bierce 44). This is the first glimpse the boy comprehends of the true devastation of war. And at this point the child has his first rational reaction,“terrified at last, ran to a tree near by, got upon the farther side of it and took a more serious view of the situation.” (Bierce 44). The author is using the childes revelation of the violence in war to introduce to his readers the devastation of
The violent nature that the soldiers acquired during their tour in Vietnam is one of O'Brien's predominant themes in his novel. By consciously selecting very descriptive details that reveal the drastic change in manner within the men, O'Brien creates within the reader an understanding of the effects of war on its participants. One of the soldiers, "Norman Bowler, otherwise a very gentle person, carried a Thumb. . .The Thumb was dark brown, rubbery to touch. . . It had been cut from a VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen"(O'Brien 13). Bowler had been a very good-natured person in civilian life, yet war makes him into a very hard-mannered, emotionally devoid soldier, carrying about a severed finger as a trophy, proud of his kill. The transformation shown through Bowler is an excellent indicator of the psychological and emotional change that most of the soldiers undergo. To bring an innocent young man from sensitive to apathetic, from caring to hateful, requires a great force; the war provides this force. However, frequently are the changes more drastic. A soldier named "Ted Lavender adopted an orphaned puppy. . .Azar strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device"(O'Brien 39). Azar has become demented; to kill a puppy that someone else has adopted is horrible. However, the infliction of violence has become the norm of behavior for these men; the fleeting moment of compassion shown by one man is instantly erased by another, setting order back within the group. O'Brien here shows a hint of sensitivity among the men to set up a startling contrast between the past and the present for these men. The effect produced on the reader by this contrast is one of horror; therefore fulfilling O'Brien's purpose, to convince the reader of war's severely negative effects.
Life for the soldiers in the beginning is a dramatic one as they are ordered up to the frontline to wire fences. The frontline makes Paul feel immediately different as described here. "As if something is inside us, in our blood, has been switched on." The front makes Paul more aware and switched on as if his senses and reactions are sharpened. I think Paul and his friends are frightened when they are near the front line. After they wire the fences and they are heading to the barracks their group start to be fired at by the enemy. They manage to get through the shelling unscathed but they hear a horse that has been shot. The horse makes a terrible noise of anguish and is in terrible pain and it has been shot as the author describes here. "The belly of one of the horses has been ripped open and it guts are trailing out." This shows that there are not just human casualties of war; the innocent lives of animals can be affected as much as humans who fight in wars. Detering-one soldier in Pauls group-says." It is the most despicable thing of all to drag animals into a war." I agree with Detering, as animals had no choice about going to war. On the way back to the trucks that would take them back to the barracks Paul Baumers company are hit again by heavy shelling and they have to take cover in a military graveyard. The shells blow huge holes in the graveyard and create large...
There were about thirty eight million collective casualties in World War 1, and about 1.4 million casualties in the Vietnam war. Nonetheless, despite the different time periods and combat tactics, it appears that the amount of compassion and sympathy for the unmasked enemy remained relatively constant; time and the inhumanity did not quite numb all the emotions that could be invoked thereafter. When Paul Baumer, stabbed a soldier in a shell hole, and witnessed his slow death, he became overrun by guilt and grief and began explaining himself, "Comrade, I did not want to kill you. If you jumped in here again, I would not do it, if you would be sensible too. But you were only an idea to me before, an abstraction that lived in my mind and called
What does war do to a man? It destroys his inner being; it crushes hope; it kills him. Experiencing battle leaves only the flesh of a man, for he no longer has a personality; it leaves a wasteland where a vast field of humanity once was. Through the main character, Paul Baumer, the reader experiences the hardships and consequences of war. During the course of the war, Paul reflects on how the young men involved in the war have no future left for them, they've become a "lost generation." Paul feels that his generation has "become a wasteland" because the war has made him into a thoughtless animal, because he knew nothing before the war, and because the war has shown the cheapness of human life.
After their first two days of fighting, they return to their bunker, where they find neither safety nor comfort. A grizzled veteran, Kat, suggests these ‘fresh-faced boys’ should return to the classroom. The war steals their spiritual belief in the sanctity of human life with every man that they kill. This is best illustrated by Paul’s journey from anguish to rationalization of the killing of Gerard Duval; the printer turned enemy who leaps into the shell-hole already occupied by Paul. Paul struggles with the concept of killing a “brother”, not the enemy. He weeps despondently as war destroys his emotional being.
This quote describes the inner thought processes of all types of varying soldiers. When Paul compares all of the “moody or good-tempered soldiers” to “instant human animals”, there is only one difference he states. The second that the soldiers reach the front, they become war animals, fit only for killing and destruction. Remarque writes about how war manipulates all feelings and dreams until it is the only remaining idea left in a soldier’s brain. Paul demonstrates this by seeing the things he has until he becomes familiarized to the horrible details that war entails. After living through the things the soldiers have to, it mellows down the soldier’s empathy. These soldiers endured horrific ordeals most, if not all, of the days. Eventually, the events that most civilians would be terrified by, become second nature to these soldiers. Things like bombardment and gas bombs are normal occurrences for the men. Killing changes from a terrible experience into something that can easily be done. Remarque repeatedly symbolizes the soldiers to portray to the reader the barbaric shadows that remain of soldiers that once had aspirations and hobbies of their own. He utilizes the motif of
After closer investigating, Paul realizes that the soldier was a French soldier that had a family and he once again had his epiphany that the soldiers were humans too and they were just forced to fight in the war because of a command. Baumer even bandages the soldier up after stabbing him and he tries to take care of the soldier before his enemy slowly dies right in front of him.
One of the worst things about war is the severity of carnage that it bestows upon mankind. Men are killed by the millions in the worst ways imaginable. Bodies are blown apart, limbs are cracked and torn and flesh is melted away from the bone. Dying eyes watch as internal organs are spilled of empty cavities, naked torso are hung in trees and men are forced to run on stumps when their feet are blown off. Along with the horrific deaths that accompany war, the injuries often outnumber dead men. As Paul Baumer witnessed in the hospital, the injuries were terrifying and often led to death. His turmoil is expressed in the lines, “Day after day goes by with pain and fear, groans and death gurgles. Even the death room I no use anymore; it is too small.” The men who make it through the war take with them mental and physical scarification from their experiences.
The story of several schoolmates who symbolize a generation destroyed by the dehumanisation of the First World War, All Quiet on the Western Front tells of the men who died, and the tragically changed lives of those who survived. Remarque follows the story of Paul Bäumer, a young infantryman, from his last days of school to his death three years later. Whereas the journey motif is typically used to portray a positive character development, that of Paul is deliberately the opposite. In what has been dubbed the greatest antiwar novel of all time, Remarque depicts the way in which Paul is snatched away from humanity by the brutality of war. However while Paul and his comrades become separated from society, and begin to rely on their basic survival instincts, in their own surroundings they still show humane qualities such as compassion, camaraderie, support and remorse. Paul’s transformation from human to soldier begins in training camp, and is reinforced by the trauma at the front. His return home further alienates him from society, and Paul begins to feel safe at the front with his friends. Nonetheless throughout the novel suffering and mortality bare Paul’s true side, and he momentarily regains his former self. Bäumer, the German word for tree, is an early indication that Paul must remain firmly rooted in reality to survive the brutality of war.
Many scenes in the novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, jump out at me and linger in my mind. The one that has made the biggest impression on me was the image of Paul killing a man and feeling immense pain from it. Paul kills the “enemy” when he jumps in the trench to hide. Paul immediately stabs him and once the man dies, he fills with sorrow. The dead body that sits there with him haunts Paul. He has to live with what he has done while the body practically stares at him. This a strong scene will stay in my mind for a long time after this book is over. It overwhelms me with many emotions when I think about Paul feeling so guilty for killing another man. He talks to the body and thinks about how the man is just like him. It pains me when