We all have had this type of teacher and it makes the essay relatable. Murray provides a way that writing could be less frustrating and more successful. It makes the reader want to agree with him and wish they had a teacher who viewed writing as he does. His willingness to allow his students to figure out how writing works best for them without being concerned about a bad grade is refreshing makes the reader have an appreciation for his
Push is saying that he pays attention and gives recognition which is doing God’s work, but because the kids he gives attention to are the kids nobody loves, so he must do the “dirty work” of paying them attention through bullying. Push may seem bad to the reader as one might contemplate that there are ways to show another person love and give that person attention other than through bullying, but as Push later explains, hate is all he has so that is his only way of expressing his love for the people nobody loves. Push says, “ I will not be reconciled, or halve my hate. It’s what I have, all I can keep” (Pg 190). Because hate is all Push has, it is his only way of showing his love and affection.
He encouraged and inspired students to read, to be proactive in their classes, and to think for themselves. His classes were engaging and the students were interested in his teachings (165-167). The fact that the same solutions that Gatto proposed in his essay was successful applied elsewhere proves that teaching practices need and can to change for the better.
This is because no score is involved and they can freely share their own ideas. Cooperating with their fellows not only helps students increase their critical thinking, but also broaden their knowledge. In more details, a cooperative environment brings them a great opportunity to deliberate about their own errors and what the best error correction is. Moreover, not only do they learn from their own errors to avoid in the next writing, but they can also study a lot from their classmates’ errors. After that, the writers can indicate their strength and weakness to ameliorate their written work.
Reflection Essay Now the communication class is almost over I have realize how important is to have good communication skills, and how it is key to life. I have learned many things in this class for example ways to approach strangers. Another thing that I have learned how to handle conflict and how sometimes it could be good it not always bad and many others. The way I look things have change to have reach my goals. This class was has also taught me how to look in the “other” perceptive, and not being selfish by just seeing one side.
As Maxwell discusses the material, he shows that the secret is discovered when we invest in the lives of other people. This can include loving problematic people, and managing criticism sometimes. In each situation, Maxwell gives ideas so that the person who reads this can be confident of achievement. The book is designed well and the material is described in a way that the reader can easily comprehend. Many steps are given with the reassurance that if they are followed the person who reads this can achieve his or her goal of becoming a people person.
My students will know that I am approachable for questions and discussion and I am friendly and the class mood that I will establish will be one that is informal, fun, and creative. There are so many people and students in this world and each of which has a slightly different view of life. That is what makes a world dynamic and interesting. I believe my educational philosophy stems from the progressive movement of thinking of such men as John Dewey and W. H. Kilpatrick. I want to show my future students that they have the power to change the world for the better, depending on whom they choose to take wise advice from and how they apply it to their lives and careers.
There are many arguments made by both the sides of this discussion, i.e. benefits and losses, but there is no sure shot way to figure it out. Because each argument feels so convincing that when you hear it you are drawn towards it. John Holt, the author of “School is Bad for Children,” would agree with the criticisms made by David Barthelme, the author of “The School,” regarding the coursework set up by the administrations, which isn’t beneficial or relevant for the growth and development of children to survive in the dynamic and fast-paced outside world. Mr. Holt would concur the criticism made by Mr. Barthelme to mock the dull-wittedness practiced by the school authorities.
This involved me in my own learning process, which made me appreciate what I learned all the more, because I felt like I had achieved it, not because someone told me this is the answer. We learn best through experience. Teaching is about evolving your students and helping them when they need it. Teaching is about encouragement, reassurance, and supplying what your students to need to reach their goals. Learning is not something you can force, but you can instill a desire to learn.
Despite both writers believing that there is a flaw in modern-day education, they come to that conclusion in separate ways. Freire predominately believes that the education system is what is restraining students, while Percy believes that the students are to be blamed for refusing to leave “the beaten track.” Regardless of the individual problem that both writers perceive as being incorrect, Freire and Percy end at the same conclusion that students are losing their individuality. Students and teachers must unite to strive for the change they deserve and to get past the preset system that is withholding them from greatness. Freire points out that true “Knowledge emerges only through invention and reinvention, through the restless, impatient, continuing, hopeful inquiry human beings pursue in the world, with the world, and with each other” (72). With these newly discovered ideas for reform, students will not be constrained by their oppressors from expressing who they truly are: