Manifest Destiny: Term or Reality

1311 Words3 Pages

The three authors that describe Manifest destiny have very different beliefs but all use one person with vastly different views on Manifest Destiny and his beliefs on the term. The person that first used the term in any form of writing was John O’ Sullivan and is accredited with coining the phrase but much of this time had this strong belief in expanding the territory and states of the United States. Their views on this term were different because some believed that the United States should expand from the Pacific to the Atlantic or the whole North American continent or the whole hemisphere. The common thing that they all believed in was the annexation of Texas into the Union and was the major driving point behind the term and movement.

As Stephanson puts it the major driving force behind expansionism and the politics behind it were driven behind the media and the press. O’ Sullivan especially followed the ideology of Jackson democracy and wanted territorial expansion and the integration of the territories eventually into the Union over time. They believed that God and Christianity were behind them to expand the United States to the vast territories in the continent. As Stephanson explains it O’ Sullivan was even willing to wait many years for these territories such as Mexico and other nearby nations to join the Union which he believed naturally belonged to the United States because of their connection with various rivers and oceans.

In Stephanson’s writing you get the idea that manifest destiny was a short term manifestation of a long term ideology and a temporary messianic impulse. As he mentions that the term was around before it was used heavily in the 1840’s to explain the reason behind the United States need for expansio...

... middle of paper ...

...t helped to spread news faster was with telegraph lines which got expanded due to the expansion. “Gaps in the lines were bridged by the use of railroads, packet steamships, pony express, and carrier pigeon” (Merk 56). This proves that technology was connecting these new territories with the old and how things spread between the two. All other nationalities would take time to blend their cultures and people into the United States culture and way of life.

Works Cited

Merk, Frederick. " Chapter 2Manifest Destiny." Manifest destiny and mission in American history: a reinterpretation. [1st ed. New York: Knopf, 1963. 24-60. Print.

Merrill, Dennis, Thomas Hietala, and Anders Stephanson. "Manifest Destiny, Texas, and the War with Mexico." Major problems in American foreign relations: documents and essays.. 7. ed. Boston [u.a.: Houghton Mifflin, 2009. 206-213. Print

Open Document