Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges in adopting total quality management in a company
Challenges in adopting total quality management in a company
Challenges in adopting total quality management in a company
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Managing Quality Improvement in Healthcare
Healthcare providers strive to improve service quality by implementing various quality management programs. Customers tend to seek for higher quality of care when choosing treatments, providers, and health plans. For healthcare organizations that desire to provide high quality care and compete in the global market, choosing a quality management program to implement is critical for performance and efficiency. Many studies have been conducted to analyze the effectiveness of such programs. Lean, Six Sigma and Total Quality Management (TQM) are three programs that will reviewed by three different case studies in efforts to understand them and to compare and contrast their capabilities.
Lean
In a qualitative study, Sobek (2011) identifies and articulates the critical success factors and strongest inhibitors to the implementation and sustainability of lean quality management practices within healthcare organizations. The study methodology consisted of a thematic analysis of literature, a cross-case analysis of medical centers that have attempted lean implementation, and a Delphi study conducted by a panel of experts in lean healthcare application. The findings showed that lean has been successful in healthcare and shows much potential. The two strongest success factors were widespread involvement of all key stakeholders and strong leadership support. Emphasis was placed on communication, training, problem solving, and standardizing for increased success with lean procedures. Despite the improvements shown with lean standards in the manufacturing industry, lean healthcare still faces many barriers.
Many healthcare facilities struggle with lean implementation and sustainability beca...
... middle of paper ...
..., Chakhunashvili, A., & Bergman, B. (2010). Lessons from sweden's first large-scale implementation of six sigma in healthcare. Operations Management Research, 3(3-4), 117-128. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12063-010-0038-y
Sobek,Durward K.,,II. (2011). Lean healthcare implementation: Critical success factors. IIE Annual Conference.Proceedings, , 1-8. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1190332495?accountid=38569
Sunder, M. V. (2013). Synergies of lean six sigma. IUP Journal of Operations Management, 12(1), 21-31. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1321940772?accountid=38569
Yasin, M. M., & Alavi, J. (1999). An analytical approach to determining the competitive advantage of TQM in health care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 12(1), 18-24. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/229692589?accountid=38569
SGH has been plagued with patient quality issues, therefore SGH finds itself in a situation which is inherently antithetical to the mission of the hospital. The costs of healthcare continue to rise at an alarming rate, and hospital boards are experiencing increased scrutiny in their ability, and role, in ensuring patient quality (Millar, Freeman, & Mannion, 2015). Many internal actors are involved in patient quality, from the physicians, nurses, pharmacists and IT administrators, creating a complex internal system. When IT projects, such as the CPOE initiative fail, the project team members, and the organization as a whole, may experience negative emotions that impede the ability to learn from the experience (Shepherd, Patzelt, & Wolfe, 2011). The SGH executive management team must refocus the organization on the primary goal of patient
In conclusion, “a study of the average benefits among US manufacturers over a five-year time frame revealed 90% reduction in cycle time, 70% reduction in inventory, 50% reduction in labor costs, and 80% reduction in space requirements” (Russell & Taylor, 2011, p. 740). There are many benefits to embracing Lean, and interest is
uses some of these. The six sigma relies on data, process, and outcomes. Per HealthIT.gov there
At its most fundamental core, quality improvement of healthcare services and resources requires disciplined attention to the measurement, monitoring, and reporting of system performance (Drake, Harris, Watson, & Pohlner, 2011; Jones, 2010; Kennedy, Caselli, & Berry, 2011). Research points to performance measurement as a significant factor in enabling strategic planning processes and achievement of performance goals (Tapinos, Dyson & Meadows, 2005). Thus, without a system of measurement that accounts for the performance behaviors of healthcare professionals, managers and administrative employees, quality improvement remains a visionary abstraction (de Waal, 2004).
Sitnikov, C. (2012). Six sigma as a strategic tool for companies. Young Economists Journal / Revista Tinerilor Economisti, 94-102.
Dinh et al. (2014) found that by employing a quality improvement system lowered trauma patient mortality by statically significant amount. These reductions in patient mortality for course benefit patients, but also lower costs by identifying waste. Caldwell (2006) states quality improvement techniques; like lean sigma six, can allow better unit staffing allocations based on patient census that protect patient safety and care quality, but also reduce staffing levels more effective and lower overall unit staffing
Vest, J.R., & Gamm, L.D., (2009) A critical review of the research literature on Six Sigma, Lean and StuderGroup's Hardwiring Excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of transformation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2009 Jul 1;4:35.
In the mid 1980s, and into the 1990s, business leaders realized that a renewed focus on quality was required to continue to compete in an expanding global market. (NIST, 2010) Consequently, several strategic frameworks were developed for managing, and measuring organizational performance. Among them were the Malcomb Baldrige National Quality Award, which was created by and act of congress and signed into law by the President in 1987, and The Balanced Scorecard, which is a performance management tool that was born out of research conducted in the late 1980s and early 1990s by Robert S. Kaplan, and David P. Norton published in 1996 (Kaplan, 1996). Initially, the renewed emphasis on quality management systems was a reaction to the LEAN approach to quality management implemented by many Japanese businesses to great success post World War II.
The Six Sigma approach was designed by Motorola in 1986. The primary objective of the concept was to develop a tool for tallying the process defects and, as the result, improving business operations. The foundations of the approach are the customer needs, statistical analysis of data and facts, and timely execution. The method promises numerous benefits such as increasing performance and profitability of an organization, improving product or service quality and employee morale, decreasing costs, the growth of market share, the higher level of satisfying customer needs, etc. (Meredith & Shafer, 2013). The primary advantage
Barnard, W., De Feo, J. (2004). Juran Institute’s Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies
For organizations who have committed to invest and deploy quality systems improvement programs, it is a huge task for every member who is a part of the transformation. The benefits are felt once completed and outweigh the cost from a long-term standpoint. Col. Larsen offers a compelling argument that Lean principles, when properly applied, also result in significant improvement and transcends industry boundaries. Leadership from all levels must challenge traditional approaches, communicate, and execute as a team to design and obtain excellence in governance of safety.
Maintenance and promotion of quality improvement initiatives are essential for the successful growth and development of the health care industry. Nurses are key to all quality improvement initiatives as they are in the frontlines and have the most contact with the healthcare consumers. Therefore, nursing professionals are good at putting in their valuable inputs for quality improvement efforts. On a daily basis nursing professionals strive to deliver safe, efficient, effective, patient-centered care in a timely manner. With the growth and development in the health care industry, there is an increased need to provide competent and high quality services. Nurses are equipped with distinctive proficiency required for delivery of patient care
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
Even though Total Quality Management (TQM) has been replaced by other quality methodologies in many cases, organizations that have taken the long arduous journey to properly implement TQM benefited from it immensely [1]. While TQM may be perceived by many employees as just another passing fad that will soon fall by the wayside, the environmental conditions that exist within the organization will determine if TQM can be successfully implemented and take root. What is Total Quality Management (TQM)? TQM is a system of continuous improvement of work processes to enhance the organization’s ability to deliver high-quality products or services in a cost-effective manner [2].
The problems of healthcare that impact quality such as medical errors, health insurance, shortage of healthcare personnel are issues that contribute to a lack of trust in health care systems. Rendering quality care should be appropriate to the need and specific actions taken in accordance to the individual need. Meltzer & Chung (2014), suggest that although quality improvement may sometimes reduce costs, the financial resources, time, and effort available for quality improvement are limited-whether within a single hospital, a payer network, a state, or a