More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast management vs leadership
Compare and contrast management vs leadership
Compare and contrast management vs leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For many centuries management and leadership have been viewed as two separate concepts with different explanations (DiMattia, 2013). Management is often referred to as administrators of leadership vision with a paid title (DiMattia, 2013), while leaders are referred to according to Kotter(1998) as influencers’ who get people to follow their vision regardless of the formal position they held in an organization. Many scholars have argued that management and leadership requires different set of skills however Pansegrouw(2017) urgues that traditional leadership roles of giving direction, aligning structures, motivating people may be conceptualized as an extension of management role when carefully reviewed in line with original concepts of management …show more content…
A managerial leader should have ability to view their organization through System thinking as concept were all parts of the system from internal such as organizational structure, people management, systems management and business processes are synchronized with external factors (Aronson, 1996). Taking the concept of managerial leadership in view of the 21st century and globalization more flexible skills are required for managerial leaders to maintain competitive edge.
The integrated framework is divided into qualities and attributes of managerial leadership in the 21st century, management of people within the systems thinking concept, management of technology, managing change, organizational re-design through reverse engineering the future and visual intelligence.
1. Qualities and attributes of managerial leadership in the 21st century. o self-actualization on an ongoing basis as explained by (Kruse, 2013); o identify other persons’ uniqueness and correctly use them in a write place (Buckingham, 2005); o built dynamics teams with different required skills and motivate team work; o Seek the knowledge required to make sense of the big picture (AchieveGlobal, 2010); o Lead rapid change and focus on value to the customers (PriceWaterHouseCoopers',
In a firm, management and leadership are important and needed. Leadership and management are similar. Actually, leadership and management are totally different. The leadership would influence the firm. The leader would have difference leadership styles to lead the subordinate.
Leadership is the ability to influence employees to voluntarily pursue organizational goals. Leadership is vision, enthusiasm, love, trust, passion and consistency. Management is to pursue organizational goals efficiently and effectively by integrating the work of people through planning, organizing, leading, and controlling organizations resources. Leadership and management are not the same. They are not interchangeable. Leadership is coping with change and management is coping with complexity (Williams 444).
Kotterman begins by highlighting the varying connotations often attached to the terms management and leadership; the former being primarily negative and the latter generally positive. From here he highlights the necessity to more clearly define these two terms and the means by which he shall do so. Kotterman uses the results of numerous management and leadership studies, the majority of data being based on subordinate opinions of role and effectiveness, to draw his comparison and thereby define the key terms. He juxtaposes management and leadership via a set of four processes. These processes are vision establishment, human development and networking, vision execution, and vision outcome (Kotterman, 2006). Following from each of these processes, a set of descriptors is offered for both management and leadership from which Kotterman draws meaning. Kotterman concludes that the two roles vary conceptually but are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Management is essentially task-centered, concerned with physical process, production, budget, and structure. Leadership is primarily human-centered, concentrating on motivation, inspiration, and needs. (Kotterman, 2006). This concl...
In today’s business environment, corporations must be able to adapt and develop strategies that allow them to remain as competitive as possible within the markets they serve. Leaders within those corporations must be able to fully understand the most effective leadership style required depending on the situation at hand. One style may be effective in one situation while another style may need to be used in another. In this day of environmental dynamism, organizations have had to refocus on organizational capabilities in order to attain a competitive advantage in such an environment. This refocus has led to a break in routines and involves a shift in organizational norms and required knowledge. James Clawson discusses the three levels of leadership in his book entitled “Level Three Leadership: Getting Below the Surface.” This article will discuss some issues that may arise within corporations and what leadership styles may be most effective for differing situations based on Clawson’s text.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Leadership constantly presents challenges to the leader’s abilities. Changes occur in the organization environment, disrupting the equilibrium. The approach a leader uses to handle and manage challenges effectively, greatly determine the success of the organization (Hall and Hord, 2006). In the modern-day organizations, challenges come in the form of people and obstacles that prevent the organization from reaching its goals. Moreover, there are a lot of complexity and unpredictability. New set of skills is required for the organization to stay competitive and achieve the set goals. Hence, the life of a modern-day leader is more demanding than ever (Kouzes and Posner, 2006).
Presently many of us have learned that managers are primarily administrators who have learned to write business plans, utilize their resources and keep track of progress. We must learn that we are not limited by job title, and that means we can utilize our management skills in any position that we are in. We must also know that we can use our leadership skills in the same situations. On the other hand we have also learned that leaders are people who have an impact on those that surround them. The main difference that separates these two roles is that management is a function that must be utilized in any type of business, and leadership is the relationship that the leader has with his followers, which in turn can motivate and energize the organization.
What is management? Management is a position of authority. Management says what need to get done and supplies the material to get it done. Management tends to be the more educated than the experienced. Managers can be trained to hold a position. Management is a position of leadership. Can leadership and management be the same? Leadership and management are not the same. Anyone can be a manager and not have any followers. Being able to manage is knowing the aspects of a mission. A leader knows the aspects, has the knowledge and the skills to accomplish the mission. But leadership and management work hand in hand with each other. The management sets the stage and the leadership makes it happen. Leadership is a human relationship process. No scientific method can be used for testing leadership. Leadership is based on human factors and no two humans are the same.
To compete in a global economy, organizations of all types are focusing on improving productivity, quality, and service. In each of these areas it is important to tap the talents of the available human resources in these organizations. Effective leaders must understand and depend on the interrelationship among organizational structure such as power, authority, influence and leadership. In addition how it abides in organizations and how it move others to accomplish the organization goals.
The method of leadership is almost as similar as management, and a leader can be a manager. “Both management and leadership are seen as positions of responsibility or accountability in an organization” (Edwards, Schedlitzki, Turnbull, & Gill, 2015). Leadership and management can relate and overlap within the roles and functions and are similar within one another in meaning. Together leadership and management direct the actions of a group or individually.
Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). Some people believe leadership and management are one in the same; however, this
Leadership and management are two words that are commonly mistaken; the relation and the differences between them are often unclear. Leadership can be defined as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or a set of goals." Managers are there to plan, organize, lead and monitor employees' activities. Leaders also have to be able to guide an organization through change. As we will see later, vision is a crucial component in the success of this task.
Leadership, without doubt, is a significantly important function of management. It helps to aggrandize efficiency and to fulfil an organization’s goals. Leadership is the ability of a manager to induce the subordinates to work with confidence, determination, courage and zeal. It is also defined as ability to influence a group towards the realization of a goal. Leaders should have the capability of developing future visions, and to drive the organizational members to want to attain the visions. This paper states my points in which I duly believe, justifies the importance of an outstanding leader in any organization.
Leadership and management are two fundamental concepts which are involved in the effective management of organizations. Leadership in my opinion is a complex concept, which includes association of human qualities and the result of their activities. To be a great leader means not only following own visions, but also work towards company’s goals.
Successful business leaders have stressed that good management skills, whether in a large corporation or in a one-person business, are vital to the success of a business. Many small business people may be good at launching their venture, but weak in managing the development and later stages of the business. DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN A MANAGER AND A LEADER Leadership is just one of the many assets a successful manager must possess. Care must be taken in distinguishing between the two concepts. The main aim of a manager is to maximise the output of the organisation through administrative implementation.