In his 2008 article Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr, a writer of books, essays and ephemera, claims that the Internet might have negative effects on cognition which could potentially taper our capacity for concentration and contemplation, therefore make us incapable of holding a long attention span. Carr uses vivid imagery, personal examples and voices the views of fellow bloggers who also agree that our way of thinking and ability to concentrate has been altered. His purpose is to address the issue that the simple use of “.com” has transformed our critical thinking patterns and our naturally functioning mind. Carr’s arguments are more indirectly pointed towards the younger generations who have become more reliant of the Internet, however, he addresses the fact that the web is running the risk of making anyone who has access to it full of artificial knowledge. Since Carr’s arguments explicitly rest not only on the views of fellow bloggers but his own opinion as well, his argument is not as persuasive due to the simple fact that he is unable to support his claim with concrete factual data.
Cognition is affected by multitasking by the multiple distractions at once, and the internet only makes this exponentially worse with texting, messaging or emailing applications, and social medias such as Facebook, twitter, or Snapchat among the many. Deeper learning is prevented from such distractions. Therefore, these two authors deduct from their studies that our brains capacities suffer from the increasing multitasking. Unfortunately, this inflation in multitasking affects concentration and reflection in a negative way ultimately upsetting academic performance. Thereupon, the internet is negatively impacting our brain and our capacity to study because of the unsubstantial distraction that it
Social media can also be a distraction and get in the way of someone trying to finish their task. Salvador Rodriguez, author of “In the digital age, breaking up is hard to do”, takes a different approach to the hazards of social media by explaining how social media constantly reminds him of people he is trying to move on from. Similarly, Rachel Lowry, the author of “Straddling Online and Offline Profiles” states how she believes that social media provides a basis for people to create fake identities in order to stand out. Users of facebook suffer from the social media outlet as it doesn’t allow people to move on from matters and forces people into creating fake identities by lying to the people close to them. Facebook doesn’t allow people to move away from certain matters thereby causing users to suffer.
Google is “making us stupid” by contributing to a rising trend of superficial thinking. In this case, the definition of stupidity is based on Nicholas Carr’s belief that Google reduces our intellectual power by narrowing our focus and processing ability, which may alter the structure of our cognitive processes as we adapt to technology. This narrowing of thought impacts our critical thinking abilities, which contributes to our increasing dependence on technology. The combination of superabundant information and the decline of patience and slower thought may be creating a situation where we are passively watching as “our own intelligence flattens into artificial intelligence” (Carr). We seem to be moving towards a model where we lazily substitute Google’s ideas for our own, consuming instead of creating.
Internet censorship today is unproductive, with large amounts of false positives and other common online activities would have to be blocked. This is just a waste of money for what we are getting. Guess who decides what is on the internet filter? A government department, not someone who is trained in law. Finally the internet filter will slow our already snail slow internet speeds.
The reason I say t... ... middle of paper ... ...her on Facebook than study for an important exam, and then they would fail or make a lower grade on it. Their priorities shift when given the choice between messaging on their phones or studying their textbooks, and the latter is usually set aside until it is too late. While it is true that technology has made much of everyone's daily life easier, it has also had some very negative impacts on our society. There are many different ways that technology can affect us, but most of them lead to same conclusions. We substitute face-to-face contact with emoticons and become more criminal just by taking the ideas that someone else posted online.
The site makes it hard for the Internet user to say no to being tracked. Mitchell warns the reader to take more consideration into what information they are giving away and that “privacy is not to be taken for granted” (Mitchell, 2013, p. 26). Getting information from the Internet would mean tra... ... middle of paper ... ..., websites and online marketers do find ways around users’ precautions to gain personal information. There are many people out there who want to use personal information like credit card numbers or addresses to cause harm to others. These cases are the extremely negative ones that people want to and should avoid.
This creates a problem for search engines because they fail to note the page to be displayed in search results, a situation that could deliver devastation to your SEO efforts and ranking goals of your services. Besides, search engines often treat repeated text as spam, which also is a negative element for your SEO initiatives. Spammy links Some guest bloggers aim is to lead visitors back to their own website or blog; they at times get into spam territory and drag your site into it. Search engine optimization aims at being spam free by generating links as naturally as possible however guest bloggers go overboard with backlinks and other unnecessary plugs, risking your site making it appear desperate and sp... ... middle of paper ... ...st called "Google penalized blog network”. Most of the blog networks which are meant for link farms can be risky, can lead to Google ban and that affects your site too.
In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in 2008 in the Atlantic, Nicholas Carr criticizes that computers significantly impede people from deeply reading and thinking by presenting both artistic and inartistic proofs. To support such an extraordinary claim which contradicts the common belief held by the audience that the Internet provides people with great benefits, more rigorous evidence is expected. Though the author tries to prove that the internet undermines people’s intelligence by listing a large number of facts, testimonies, and reasoning, he fails to appeal to logos because of the use of unrepresentative examples which ignore some types of readers and faulty logic, which combined with his questionable ethos, ultimately
However if there are others that believe it’s more about a hindrance than a help, because of the way it distracts people. Are people depending too much on the internet? The book Shallows; What The Internet Is Doing To Our Brains, by Nicholas Carr, discusses different forms of technology and how they are developing and starting to affect humans in different ways. The use of the internet has gained more popularity than ever over the past ten years. Carr mentions in the book that new technology is destroying the way that humans think, and is making us lose ourselves a little.