The Kingdom of Hungary, essentially the Kingdom of Magyar, surrounded by other states, had often been vulnerable to the invasion, which led to the division of the country: central and Southern part was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire for more than a century, North and West part was ruled by Hapsburg and the Eastern territory remained as the Hungarian Kingdom which later became the Principality of Transylvania. The kingdom was finally united in 1699, though under the rule of Hapsburg-Austria. Prior to the establishment of the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungry Empire in 1868, the Magyars rose in arms to gain independence, just as French and Prussians did. However, the Hungarian nationalistic movement was different from them, for the half of the population was constituted of mix of different ethnic groups such as German, Slovak, and Romanians. The ruling estate of the original ethnic group spoke their own Magyar language, just as the others spoke their own language. Latin was therefore used in the state affairs, as well as in the everyday life as a medium of communication. However, the model of ethnolinguistic nation state cultivated in the Western Europe reached Hungarian intellectuals and their road for the independence from the Hapsburg rule started through the assimilation programme called Magyarisation. In this essay, I will attempt to explain the reasons why the Magyarisation was caused in the Kingdom of Hungary within the Hapsburg-Austria, by first studying the Magyar nobility and their intentions. Then I would like to examine how the nineteenth-century concept of the nation state with a single language influenced the Magyarisation and in turn, triggered the Pan-Slavic movement.
Magyarisation
Magyarisation was a movemen...
... middle of paper ...
...eived as a linguistic assimilation to German language. However, the nationalistic movement was also a defensive one to protect the Magyar elites’ prestigious status in the kingdom. The nobility’s wish to protect their economic interest was transformed to linguistic movement, incorporating French and German linguistic philosophy to advocate a mono-lingual state. This could also be seen as the Hungarians’ attempt to legitimise their position in the international sphere. Finally, Pan-Slavism also had an effect on the Magyarisation. Though the Slovak’s nationalism started as a reaction to Magyarisation, Hungarians nevertheless felt threatened and led to strengthen the policy of monolingual state. Therefore, Pan-Slavism was a one of the many factors influenced the decision of the Magyar nobilities to further pursue the linguistic assimilation to their language of Magyar.
Imre Nagy, Premier of Hungary, responded to Stalin’s death and Khrushchev’s policies with attempts for reform that seemed anything but socialist. Nagy advocated for an increased development of agriculture and a reduction in what he considered to be “excessive industrialization,” (Nagy, 425). Going directly against Stalin’s policies, Nagy also believed that “Greater tolerance is to be shown in religious questions,” (Nagy, 426). Nagy’s views directly contradicted previous socialist thought, which advocated for strong industry and oppression of religion in all its forms. Nagy’s views caused him to be removed from his position, but he had sparked a fire of ideas in Hungary. In 1956 a revolt broke out, which partially stemmed from a desire to reinstate Nagy. However, the Soviet Union cracked down on Hungary, which resulted in bloodshed. Hungary had revolted and declared independence from the Warsaw Pact. The USSR descended upon Hungary leaving many dead. This violent uprising is akin to the Marquis in France during WWII. The Marquis “were fighting for the liberation of their country,” via “violent means,” (Hallie, 9). Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed depicts the Marquis in an essentially negative light. The uprising in
Loya, Shay. Liszt's Transcultural Modernism and the Hungarian-Gypsy Tradition. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2011.
...uation that had enveloped in the country. Also discussed the powerful rise in a leader who invoked a “Greater Serbia”, and who used Nationalism to destroy Yugoslavia as a country.
Wolfsgrüber, Cölestin. “The Austro-Hungarian Monarchy.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907. 18 December 2011
Benjamin Harshav’s “Language in Time of Revolution” teaches the reader that social factors, historical factors, willpower, and accidents of history brought back and revived the Hebrew and Yiddish language. This was important because it created the base for a new, secular Jewish society and culture to emerge again with their own language and a new social identity. This new social identity meant that there was a nationalistic movement toward having a common language, literature, and cultural heritage. However, the reason why the Hebrew and Yiddish language lagged in the first place was due to Nazism and Stalinism. These two totalitarian empires wiped out the Yiddish culture since the Jews were not the majority population in places such as Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires. Since only one language of government and education was imposed on various ethnic groups, it is not a surprise that the Yiddish language became irrelevant. Stalinists argued that Jews can’t be a nation because they do not have a territory and a common language; the Zionists, however, tried to help by enforcing the Hebrew language on immigrants from all countries and languages because they believed in “national power and sovereignty rather than mere cultural autonomy.”
Unlike most “victimized” cultures of Western European domination, the Ottoman Empire was considerably successful and powerful for many years, particularly in the sixteenth and early seventeenth century under the rule of Sulayman the Magnificent (Haberman, 132). By 1520, the Ottoman Empire had secured much of the Arab Middle East, Belgrade and most of Hungary (Haberman, 132...
There was a long-standing rivalry between Austria-Hungary and Russia due to their interests in the Balkans. Russia saw her role as leading and supporting her fellow Slav peoples in the Balkans. This Pan-Slav concept provided an ideal excuse to interfere in the Balkans and to extend Russia's influence towards the Eastern Mediterranean. Ideally Russia wished to open the Dardenelles straits to its warships. Austria-Hungary was concerned that this Russian encouragement of nationalism may threaten her borders and inspire nationalism within her own empire. In turn, Germany recognised that as Austria's closest ally her fate was linked with that of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Austria-Hungary was anxious to prevent Russian encroachment in the Balkans. This aim would be best served by the elimination of Serbia, Russia's Balkan ally. In 1878, Russia was humiliated at the Congress of Berlin when her proposal for a Greater Bulgarian state was rejected and Austria-Hungary occupied Bosnia to maintain order amongst the nationalist revolts.
Nationalisms powerful and intense impact on individuals is demonstrated in Rudolf von Ihering’s Two Letters (1866). By offering individuals a group to be a part of became something which appeared to be boundless in its potential for prosperity and it gave individuals a sense of empowerment. Initially, Von Ihering had rigorously opposed Realpolitik’s policies which were employed by Otto von Bismarck, declaring that, “everyone [in Ger...
Nationalism was viewed in so many different ways by so many different leaders and society. Many conflicts and wars were a long term impact on Nationalism, but some conflicts were a small impact on Nationalism. The Frankfurt Constitution was written and published and also is a document of Germany History today. The article “On the Duties of Man”, by Giuseppe Mazzini and how the map of Europe was redrawn, which was a huge impact on Nationalism. Romanticism was another huge impact of Nationalism, with many changes that was made from artist and how their paintings became more realistic and how everyone had different views on artist’s painting.
Are Jewish people ruling the world? How comes that all Jews are rich people? These kind of questions are considerable asked by Turkish people. Lots of conspiracy theories are created and they engage people’s attention. In other words, this issue creates lots of question marks in people’s minds. It would be pretty hard to find out who rules the world for an undergraduate paper but it is clearly possible to mention that Jewish people has always been in a special position in different countries. Jews has always been in a privileged position for the Turkic states as well, especially for the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. This essay aims to make references to the related issues about the Jewish people and their economic lives. In order to understand the position of Jewish people in the Ottoman Empire, it is beneficial to comprehend the political, economic and social atmosphere in the Ottoman Empire.
Hungary is in Central Europe, Northwest of Romania. It was “a part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire until its collapse during World War I” (Factbook). After World War II, the country fell to Stalin’s regime. The announcement of Hungary’s removal in the Warsaw Pact caused a vast riot. The Hungarian Revolution was a spontaneous nationwide revolt against the government of the Hungarian People's Republic and its Soviet-forced policies. It was the first major threat to Soviet control since the USSR's forces drove out the Nazis at the end of World War II. In spite of the failure of the revolution, it was exceedingly significant, and came to play a position in the downfall of the Soviet Union years later.
RESTATE THESIS: Military reforms caused a drastic cultural and social reform in the Muscovite era which enabled significant national change through the years of Ivan III and Feodor.
Kuzio, T. (2001). Historiography and National Identity among the Eastern Slavs: Towards a New Framework. National Identities, 3(2), 109-132
German-Austria must return to the great German mother country, and not because of any economic considerations. No, and again no: even if such a union were unimportant from an economic point of view; yes, even if it were harmful, it must nevertheless take place. One blood demands one Reich. Never will the German nation possess the moral right to engage in colonial politics until, at least, it embraces its own sons within a single state. Only when the Reich borders include the very last German, but can no longer guarantee his daily bread, will the moral right to acquire foreign soil arise from the distress of our own people. Their sword will become our plow, and from the tears of war the daily bread of future generations will grow. And so this little city on the border seems to me the symbol of a great mission. And in another respect as well, it looms as an admonition to the present day. More than a hundred years ago, this insignificant place had the distinction of being immortalized in the annals at least of German history, for it was the scene of a tragic catastrophe which gripped the entire German nation. At the time of our fatherland's deepest humiliation, Johannes Palm of Nuremberg, burgher, bookseller, uncompromising nationalist and French hater, died there for the Germany which he loved so passionately even in her misfortune. He had stubbornly refused to denounce his accomplices who were in fact his superiors. In thus he resembled Leo Schlageter. And like him, he was denounced to the French by a representative of his government An Augsburg police chief won this unenviable fame, thus furnishing an example for our modern German officials in Herr Severing's Reich.
Corfield, Justin. "Austria-Hungary." American History Online. Facts On File News Services, n.d. Web. 12 Oct.