Maggie Nelson's The Argonauts

929 Words2 Pages

Maggie Nelson’s work The Argonauts is a genre-blending memoir, which at its core explores the imitations of love and language by offering brazen and intense firsthand accounts into the complexities and delights of making a gender fluid family. Traditional aspects of unconditional love, specifically in the nuclear family, are rarely present in this work. Does Nelson believe that love and language have their own limitations? Or is she pushing the boundaries by questioning the definition of “unconditional love” and if there is even such a concept in the modern world? This question is initially exemplified in The Argonauts when it states: “the conviction that words are not good enough. Not only not good enough, but corrosive to all that is good, …show more content…

Nelson proves this notion when she states: “I cannot hold my baby at the same time as I write” (37). By declaring this, Nelson identities that unconditional love has its own limitations, although one may have an ultimate focus in life, the modern world surrounding us conditions our behaviors, we, therefore, must departmentalize aspects of our daily lives. Modern society proves not only contradicting but also impregnable to the practices and ideals of unconditional love, which encourages humans to believe that love conquers all. In turn, the ideal of love conditional love can exaggerate and evolve into a form of resigned acceptance. This notion becomes evident when Nelson states: “I wanted this for my sake, not yours (which meant it was a desire I would need to dispose of quickly)” (51). Nelson’s firsthand account into the complexities and delights of making a gender fluid family examines the reality that unconditional love has the power to limit one’s own desires; these limitations of love and language illustrate the fact that there are conditions in “unconditional love.” Unconditional love is no longer seen as something revered and adored. Even Nelson’s connection to her own desires are not highly emphasized in this passage; there is an apparent gap between unconditional love and its relativity in our modern

Open Document