Loyalty And Group Loyalty Essay

Professor Michael Sandel presents that individuals possess certain political and moral obligations, specifically a sense of loyalty and group membership. The moral challenge of this argument, which opposes the principle of individualism, is that the people’s attachment to multiple narratives, their attempt to find a sense of belonging to multiple communities, can potentially lead to confusion and conflict. An example of the solidarity sense of the “self” is when French resistance pilots during the World War refused to bomb their home town as it would be a moral crime to murder their people despite the fact that they supported the cause of liberating France. If we were to admire this soldier’s act of valiance, it is because we recognize the issues of solidarity, membership, and loyalty at stake. There are two liberal conceptions of the moral and political objections to the idea of loyalty and group

Earlier studies of wisdom have suggested that when knowledge becomes so ingrained in societal thought, society develops a comfort in grounding their inferences on this knowledge; they assume it to be universally and inevitably true. Yet their oblivion to and ignorance of other aspects of knowledge ultimately depreciates their ability to think broadly as a cohesive society and integrate different thoughts to form nuanced, creative ideas. We should never take any element of knowledge with unwavering certainty; we must ponder, doubt, experiment, and integrate the subjective with the objective, relying on both beliefs and fact. Only then is humanity able to grow and advance. Indeed, we can never be one-hundred percent confident that our perception of legal and illegal Latino immigrants resembles absolute truth; we often base our perceptions of those around us on basic assumptions and stereotypes fueled by sources of