More handpicked essays just for you.
Advancement of technology affecting modern society
Impact of Technology on Society
Media and its affects on teenagers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lowering the Voting Age limit to 16 - would be a mistake. At 16 years old, your still a kid. You're still learning everyday experiances and lessons; you've just now hit that age where you can get a job without a workers permit, you can drive a car, and you may get more freedom at home. However, that doesn't mean that you have the knowledge about what is best for this country. I believe that keeping the voting age at 18 is what's best because, at the age 18 your legally an adult and probably have had some major responablitles in your life for years now, 16 year olds are still kids and aren't aware to make important votes as to how our goverment is run, they could be easily influenced by their friends opinions, and lastly lowering the age limit that much when 16 year old kids frankly don't know whats going on or care about whats going on in the politcal world, therefore should not be apart of casting votes to determine who would be "best" for our country. …show more content…
When you've hit the age 18 you've hopefully already had some experiances about what you think is best for our country as a whole. At this age, most are mature enough and have had respsonablities, a job and a good work ethic. At this age you can make decisions-not based off of others, but solely on your own life experiances that could help our country benefit. I feel like most 18 year olds have more of an open mind, are more mature, and look at the pros and cons of every canidate, in every situation. They look at things as a whole and how we can grow and benefit from those factors. Keeping the voting limit where it is at is the best thing for our country right
As becoming the age of 18, people has the chance to start voting. People 18-24 have a lower percentage of voting than other ages. This is because the youth vote has changed over time and the reasons why the youth vote doesn’t want to vote. I will vote in the upcoming elections when I turn of
The age of responsibility could not make sense at 18 because of all the rights and responsibilities that are given at age 18 such as financial decisions and college and moving out of the house, but their are still so many things that 18 year olds cannot do such as they still can't rent cars or drink alcohol. “...lowering the legal limit to 18 would only be pushing the drinking problem down to 16-17 year old.” (Wagenaar 17). According to Alexander Wagenaar in Greenblatt’s article lowering the age down to 18 would make drinking a big problem for younger teenagers that are 16 and 17. This could make an even bigger problem in high school because people may say that they are close to the age and they may feel more responsible even though they are not. Therefore, it would not make sense to have 18 be the legal
The age at which one is eligible to vote has been a source of heated discussions and debates. Should the voting age be lowered? Should it remain at age 18?
We knocked on the door of the off-campus apartment, as it opened we were confronted with the heavy stench of alcohol. A young girl was passed out on the living room floor, a pile of empty beer cans filled the kitchen sink, and the deafening music rattled the window panes. A group of girls managed to stumble past us. They waved goodbye to the host, who was handing drinks to me and my sister. It was not my first time drinking. In fact, everyone there was quite experienced – after all, it’s college. Half of the guests were completely drunk, and I had no problem with it. That is, until later that night when my sister locked herself in a room with a guy she had met only a week before. This prompted me to seriously consider the effects of alcohol. Would my sister have been able to see the danger of the situation had she been sober? Would the absence of alcohol have prevented the events of that night from occurring? These questions, along with the vivid memory of that night, fueled my examination of the complex social problem of underage drinking.
Lawmakers should not consider lowering the drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen. Despite the deep value this country places on freedom, personal liberties, and personal responsibilities, the data shows that public safety is greatly at risk if the drinking age were to be lowered to twenty-one. A variety of groups believe that the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen deeming that the twenty-one law is unconstitutional. On the opposing side, people agree that the law helps to protect our young people and the communities where they live.
... equal system. The lower age could also encourage and interest youth much more in political processes and parties as now they would actually be able to impact the way they are governed and who is governing them. Politics would be much more noticeable in schools and the general knowledge of politics and the political process would drastically increase. The youth would also be more likely to develop earlier the skills and potentials needed in later life politically and even socially. In conclusion when all is said and done I, personally would like to say the voting age lowered to sixteen for many of the reasons above. There will be many people opposing this movement but I think it is time for the youth of Canada to be heard and if they wish they should have the opportunity to vote and express their opinions and choices.
The voting age requirement was changed to 18 because it was believed that if you were old enough to be drafted to fight in the Vietnam War at 18, then you should be allowed to vote.
Turning 18, one becomes an adult, however there are still many things that are restricted and not allowed until one reaches an even older age. The most controversial today is the minimum legal drinking age. Much like in the 1920s, when prohibition was established by the 18th amendment and all alcohol was banned from the United States, underground binge drinking occurred resulting in the opposite of what the law was intended to do. Then in 1933, the 21st amendment overturned that law, making alcohol legal again. Further down the timeline, in 1980 Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) was founded to stop drunk driving, support those affected by drunk driving, prevent underage drinking, and overall push for stricter alcohol policy. From their efforts, the federal government put in place a law that would revoke ten percent of any states highway funding who did not have their minimum legal drinking age set to 21. Immediately in 1984, all states raised their legal drinking ages to 21 in fear of being withheld the funding. Today, 30 years later, the law is still in place, however a debate has sprung up in support of lowering the drinking age back to 18. The group Amethyst Initiative, which has gained support from prestigious universities such as Dartmouth, Duke, and Virginia Tech, started this uproar. Through this, the question emerged, should the legal drinking age be lowered back to 18, and what would result if it happens? There are three positions on this issue. Position one wants to keep the drinking age as is, like Matt Nagin in “Top 3 Reasons Why the Drinking Age Should Not be Lowered.” Position two wants the legal drinking age to be lowered back to 18, like Dale Archer M.D. in “The Pros and Cons of Drinking at 18.” And position th...
Several organizations exist that are either in support of or opposed to lowering the minimum legal drinking age. Choose Responsibility, a group founded by John McCardell, proposes that upon completion of a 40 hour course to educate young people about alcohol, 18, 19, and 20 year old people should be licensed to drink. The Amethyst Initiative, part of Choose Responsibility, is a petition to Congress to rethink the minimum legal drinking age. Several college leaders have signed this petition in the belief that lowering the minimum legal drinking age will reduce binge drinking on college campuses. The Insurance Institute For Highway Safety (IIHS) has performed research on the results of states lowering, then raising, their minimum legal drinking ages and found that the minimum legal drinking age and alcohol related deaths and injuries have an inverse relationship: deaths and injuries decrease when the minimum legal drinking age increases. Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) believes that 21 as the minimum legal drinking age curbs drunk driving and reduces deaths among youth. The American Medical Association (AMA), along with MADD, argues that the age limit of 21 has a medical basis. I believe that the minimum legal drinking age should not be lowered to 18. Moving underage drinking into the public is not likely to reduce binge drinking, studies show that a higher minimum legal drinking age results in fewer fatal vehicle crashes, and alcohol has several negative medical effects on young people.
The Voting Age Must be Lowered for Democracy to Exist in America. Imagine for a moment that senior citizens were denied the right to vote. Imagine senior citizens being thought of as too incompetent to vote because some senior citizens are senile. Can you imagine such a large percentage of the American public being denied the right to vote – simply on account of their age? It doesn't happen in America, right?
Have you ever wondered if the legal driving age should be lowered? Well, I have, and I think the driving age is already perfect as it is. One reason is because kids might not be mature enough. Another reason why I think this is because they could be too short to reach all the pedals. The last reason kids should not drive cars is because they could not be heavy enough. As you can see, these are my three reasons why I think the legal driving age should not be lowered.
I think that the legal age of voting should be age 21 and older because when they are at least 21 they are able to make good decisions and choose which one would be the best President. When they are at age 21 they are at the drinking age legally. And that means that they can make big decisions and be responsible and they should be the ones to be to vote.
Hello, I am RJ Dearing. I am a sophomore at Washington Virtual Academies and I am writing to you to tell you why you should change the minimum age to vote to be at least closer to sixteen years of age. The younger generation of teens and young adults who also have a few opinions on politics like myself would love to voice our opinions on our own ballets. The only problem is the minimum age to vote right now is eighteen. A whole two years of waiting for our voices to be heard, when all you have to do is change the minimum age and let us have our voice heard on political matters.
In “You’re 16, You’re Beautiful and You’re a Voter,” author Anya Kamenetz states her belief that the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. Kamenetz gives several premises to her argument.
There are some things a sixteen year old simply is not equiped for, and voting is one of them. At the young age of sixteen we are not yet fully grown, our bodies and brains are still developing and our hormones are running wild. If we lowered the voting age to sixteen would we also let our teens drink or join the military and send them off to war? Voting is a huge responsability, far to large to place on the shoulders of children who should be concerned with their school work and just barely entering into the world of dating.