Although teens are legally considered adults by the age of eighteen and the minimum legal drinking age prompts underage teens to exhibit risky behavior, the age restriction should not be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen because young teens would have easier access to alcohol, the minimum legal drinking age has decreased alcohol-related problems, and alcohol can cause damage to underage drinkers. In the United States, there have been a numerous amount of laws and restrictions put into place to regulate and control the use of alcohol. During the twentieth century, most states had drinking age restrictions ranging from ages eighteen to twenty-one. Many states lowered their limits to eighteen in 1971 due to the lowering of the voting age, although the states re-raised their age restrictions when they received discontent over the increase in drunk-driving accidents. The lowered age also created problems between states.
Proponents of lowering the legal drinking age from 21 argue that it has not stopped teen drinking, and has instead pushed more illegal underage drinking. On the other hand, however, Opponents of lowering the legal drink age argue that teens have not yet reached an age where they can handle alcohol responsibly. The legal drink age should stay at twenty-one because people tend to be more mature and responsible at 21 than at 18. 18-year-olds are typically entering a new phase of independence from their parents through college or the workforce, and are more susceptible to binge drinking, risky sexual activity, and other irresponsible behavior due to lack of maturity. Even though there are only a couple of years between these two ages I feel that a lot of growing and maturing happens in those years.
Sure teens drink less often than adults but when they do drink they definitely drink more than adults. This practice is known as binge drinking. These harmful and unsafe activities that many teens are engaging in definitely prove the argument that the Minimum Legal Drinking Age 21 lowers the number of underage drinking wrong. If, as adults, people have the right to serve on juries and make major decisions that can influence a whole nation, then at 18 people should be able to consume alcohol without having to worry about breaking the law. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would encourage people to drink responsibly and it would reduce traffic accidents that are caused by people driving under the influence.
Should consuming alcohol beverages hold a restriction if under the age of 21, since underage teens sneak to consume beverages? Alcohol is the drug by choice pertaining the youth, many are experiencing the consumption, and effect with or without laws prohibiting it .using alcohol for various manners such as, celebrations, peer pressure, sadness, and other personal reasoning. Being a teen and underage drinking is a form of rebellion toward the higher authorities due to desires of breaking the law, and with the increase of age generates the abuse to consume more. Gulping huge amounts instead of drinking it in moderation, because teens are not sure of the next time they’ll be able drink again. Drinking age shouldn’t be lowered to age eighteen because alcohol consumption effects early adult brain maturity, cigarettes are legal because it doesn’t have the same effect as drinking, being eighteen is legally considered age of adulthood.
No one can argue with the fact that underage drinking is a huge problem in our society today. Nonetheless, there are ways to decrease these problems. The current drinking age, twenty-one, is not beneficial to our country anymore. Lowering the age to eighteen with a license will impact our country in a positive way, by decreasing the numbers of drunk driving incidents, and alcohol poisoning due to minors drinking in secret Those who oppose lowering the drinking age say that lowering it will cause less underage age drunk driving accidents. They also say that the 18-20-year-old brain is not developed enough to safely consume alcohol.
In other countries around the world a person under the age of 21 can drink alcohol, while some countries don't even have an age limit, but in America a person has to be 21 to purchase alcohol. At the age of 18 a person could go to was for their country, could vote, buy cigarettes, but they cannot buy alcohol. One of the main causes of the drinking age being set to 21 was teenagers were getting into car accidents after getting drunk. By no means should driving under the influence should be legal. While, there should be more government programs to educate and prevent people from driving intoxicated.
If the age was lowered to 18 it would create safer environments for younger drinkers. If the age was lowered teens would go out to bars and nightclubs where alcohol consumption can be monitored. It would help reduce the amount of underage drinking and driving accidents. Accidents themselves are the most common thing among new legal drinkers disregarding the MLDA. In facts there are fewer drunken driving accidents and fatalities in c... ... middle of paper ... ...a new type of freedom at age 18 and it is probably not a good idea to make it legal for them to consume alcohol.
Alcohol intake can hinder the brain development of the young adult. With brain damage young adults are likely to partake in unsafe acts, bad decision making, and self- destruction (Drinking Age). Lowering the age to drink will cause a setback in the ... ... middle of paper ... ...ates good decision making and may reduce alcohol abuse. In rebuttal, others argue that giving young adults the option to drink alcohol increases traffic accidents and increases health risks. In the United States the legal age to drink should remain twenty one.
Now that the drinking age is 21 still teens around the age 19 and 18 are getting alcohol. Lowering the age limit to 18 would only lead to younger teens getting drunk. When I was 18 I was introduced to alcohol because I had friends that were 21 year olds. Had the age been 18, I would have been exposed to drinking at 15. This would lead to more accidents a...
The benefits would be that it would one get rid of feelings increasing , two people should have freedom of choice and tree, it is wrong to drink at such a young age. According to the drinking age ProCons.org, lowering the drinking age will invite more use of illicit drugs among 18-21 year olds. It is more likely that they will use other illicit drugs. Lowering the minimum drinking age to 21 would increase the number of teens who drink and therefore the number of teens who use other drugs knowing the effects of this situation, and understanding what can happen. Young adults cloud face many more problems than just .