King (1990, page x) argues that the dissolution of empire has been
critical to the growth of world cities. How far does this apply to
London?
Modern patterns of development and growth have been shaped and
influenced by the historical context of colonialism. Within this
context relationships between capitalist and pre-capitalist states or
colonies helped forge a world economy, which would later lead to
processes of globalisation and the current economic world order.
Expansion in the world economy has been exacerbated by the freer flow
of labour, goods, services and capital, which are features of the
post-war, post-colonial world. King contends that these factors have
been "critical to the growth of world cities." (King, 1990: x)
Urbanisation in many post-colonial states has been rapid, supported by
trade with a greater number of nations compared with that of the
colonial period. Indeed, many colonial nations have now followed their
own paths of industrialisation, instead of relying primarily on their
export of natural resources such as timber; their economies are
becoming more diverse and are now linked within a global network of
trade and commerce that is enabling them to develop significantly.
Existing at the heart of these states are primary cities, the
administrative and economic centres for their new global roles.
World cities can be defined by their size, population and area; they
are usually the economic hub of the country in which they are seats of
power and dominate in the cultural arena with their iconic
architectural distinctiveness and the importance of their historical
roles. "World cities lie at the junction between the world economy and
the territorial national state." (Friedmann and Wol...
... middle of paper ...
...c function as a
global centre for banking and financial trading, which increasingly
determine its international role and its patterns of modern growth.
Bibliography.
Coupland, Andy: 'Every Job an Office Job.' And 'Docklands: Dream or
Disaster?' In Thornley, Andy (ed) (1992) 'The Crisis of London.'
Routledge.
Friedmann, J and Wolff, G. (1982) 'WorldCityformation: an agenda for
research and action.', International Journal of Urban and Regional
Research: 6.
Hall, P (1977 2nd edition) 'The World Cities.' Weidenfield and
Nicholson, London. Ch 2.
King, AD (1990) 'Global Cities: Post-Imperialism and the
Internationalization of London.' Routledge.
Porter, Roy (1994) 'London: A Social History.' Penguin, London.
Shappard, Francis (1998) 'London: A History.' Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
Wells, H.G. (1908) 'Tono-Bungay.' London: Oldhams Press.
Phillips, E. Barbara. City Lights: Urban-Suburban Life in the Global Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Smith, D. A. (1996). Third World Cities in Global Perspective: The Political Economy of Uneven Urbanization. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press Inc.
called the New Paris, or the modern capital of Europe. The streets , buildings and the services
Urban Regeneration in the London Docklands The London Docklands Development Corporation is located along the River Thames Estuary 2.a) The London Docklands had to close for many reasons. The main reason was the Second World War. The area suffered substantial bomb damage in the Second World War, which lead to the need for a substantial rebuilding programme. In the first 20 years after the Second World War, many buildings came to the end of their usefulness.
Openness and enterprise were the foundations of Amsterdam's prosperity. The city as well as the tiny country of Holland achieved their premier position in the modern era by creating a dynamic network of global trade. Most people know that New York was originally New Amsterdam, and that the Dutch people were the pioneers of capitalism. But how did it play out?
The desertion by the British government of the laissez-faire approach was instigated by a magnitude of rationales that induced this transformation of attitude. Laissez-faire translates from French to denote ‘let do’ or in English terminology to ‘leave alone’. In practice, this perspective meant that the government did not interfere positively or negatively in people’s lives. The belief was that if a person was impoverished they were accountable for it and it was due to their personal misguidance, for example gambling, alcoholism, idleness or solely due of their lack of ability in dealing with their finances. If the main wage earner within a family perished then it would cause the family extreme poverty. This was seen as an inevitable yet unfortunate part of society by the upper classes. In the late 20th century the government (under the Liberals) were seen to play two roles, to maintain law and order and to prevent invasion of Britain. No family allowances, pensions or unemployment benefits were available which meant that once in poverty, it was the responsibility of the individual to remove themselves from the situation without government help. This did however change, through reforms by the Liberal government who were heavily influenced by the surveys done by Charles Booth and Seebohm Rowntree, the Boer War and the shocking insight into the health of the working class it gave, attitudes of ‘new’ Liberals, ‘national efficiency’, the German model and the rise of the labour party.
Cities grew simply because that’s where the jobs were. Poor immigrates settled into cites looking for work and often took low end factory jobs to get by. Between 1840 and 1860 4.2 million immigrates moved to the United States, mostly Irish and Germans (Lecture 11). The Irish, who were fleeing the great famine, came to America looking for a new start (Lecture 11). Arriving with little money and no skills, outside of agriculture skills, had to take low paying factory jobs and live in the slums (Lecture 11). The Irish took jobs native American didn’t want like building the railroad and canals, common laborers, servants, longshoremen and factory operators (Give Me Liberty 335). While the Germans who were fleeing political upheaval, arrived with a little more money in their pockets were able to buy land and start their own business (Lecture 11). They established themselves as craftsmen, shop keepers, and farmers and lived in tight knit communities in eastern cities (Give Me Liberty
Downtown London had the highest vacancy rate in the city space was being rented for prices between fifty cents and two dollars per meter which was lower than the average in London.
Each man has a different background and different problems with which to deal; how that person solves his problems, makes the man who he is. During the Industrial Revolution in America, technological advancements began to greatly impact the lives of the American people. To the poor people, the city was a glamorous place with a multitude of opportunities to work and gain wealth. To the rich people, the city was where their successful and monopolized businesses were located, but it was associated with continuous poverty. As America’s industrial revolution continued to grow during the Gilded Age, a gap between the wealthy and the wealth-less grew thicker in education, the economy and politics, and urbanization.
My conclusion is a lesson that can be learned from the history of Birmingham, you can start with something small and with enough effort it will become big, but nothing will last forever. With Birmingham it started with a small market but with enough effort it turned into a big industrial centre, but it’s not the centre we know now, because it was ‘ruined’ by the interventions after WWI and WWII. But who knows? Maybe in 100 years it will be an industrial centre again!
...itner, H., Peck, J. and Sheppard, E.S. (2007) Contesting Neoliberalism Urban Frontiers, New York: Guilford press.
The world has changed in many ways throughout history. Industrialization has changed England in many ways. The Industrial Revolution was too hard on the men, women, and children in England.
Competition has increased extensively as the ideology of a ‘global village’ has grown in support and has become a goal that many cities are attempting to achieve. This has resulted in cities adopting ingenious and original strategies in order to remain ahead of the game and these strategies have ensued cities to grow into creative cities. But what exactly is a creative city? Sire Peter Hall, an English professor, wrote in his book “Cities in Civilisation” that the phenomenon of the creative city is one that belongs to every age and no city constantly displays creativity.
Thomas Buttafarro, Jr. Joseph Deluca , Katelyn Gensler. (2009), London The World’s City. BDG Consulting, Inc. London.
Global cities are cities with substantial economic power, controlling the concentration and accumulation of capital and global investments. Despite this, global cities are the sites of increasing disparities in occupation and income. This is as a result of large in-migration and growing income inequality together with capacity and resource constraints, and inadequate Government policies.