Local Adaptation of Plants

1863 Words4 Pages

In this study, the effect of introducing non-local plant material into a certain environment for restoration purposes was investigated. Several studies already showed that plants exhibit local adaptation to their sympatric environment (Howe et al., 2003; Savolainen et al., 2007; Leimu and Fischer, 2008; Salmela, 2014). We hypothesized that if A. arenaria shows evidence of local adaptation, we expect the plants of the experimental site, and closely related ones, to have a greater performance than allopatric populations (Vander Mijnsbrugge et al., 2010). Results indicated an increase in survival with increasing distance from the study site in the first phase of the experiment. In the second phase, the relation between survival and distance was no longer significant. However, when the data from both phases were combined, the positive relation between distance and survival proved to be significant. This could be an indication that more distant populations have a higher survival in a foreign environment. On the other hand, the condition of the plants was not significantly dependent on the geographical distance. Taking both results into consideration, we cannot say we found evidence for local adaptation in marram grass, but we saw an effect of the origin of the plants on the survival.
It is not unusual that local adaptation is not found in experiments. In the meta-analysis of Leimu and Fischer (2008), they stated that local adaptation in plants is far less common than previously thought. Several explanations can be given as to why we did not find evidence for local adaptation in this species. As previously stated, local adaptation will normally be favoured in cases with variation in selection regimes between habitats. If there is spatia...

... middle of paper ...

...period to at least a decade to be able to incorporate temporal variation as well. Also, we transferred the plants into the field when they were still young seedlings. This way, we only have results from the first life stages of the plants. Studies already proved that a lot of plant traits can change during the ontogeny of plants (Mason et al., 2013; Barton, 2014). Because of this, mature plants might respond differently to the same circumstances. Also, we cannot completely exclude maternal environmental effects as a possible factor for the observed pattern, since the seeds were collected directly in the field. It is commonly known that the maternal environment can influence important life-history traits of the offspring (Roach and Wulff, 1987). If the experiment were to be conducted for a longer period of time, these maternal effects would normally be eliminated.

Open Document