Literary Criticism Of The Waste Land

1038 Words3 Pages

Literary Analysis of “The Waste Land”

When T.S Eliot wrote “The Waste Land”, just four years after World War 1, he was deeply troubled by the true nature of the people around him. People seemed too willing to abandon their cultures and submit to a rule of the mob. This coupled with the nearly nine million causalities of the war caused Eliot and many other artists to rethink their ideas of art and literature. In the resulting influx of experimental styles in art, T.S Eliot created “The Waste Land” to express his disgust with the modern sea of stupid, violent, and worst of all, average people ("T.S. Eliot Biography."). In the first section of the “The Waste Land,” T.S Eliot’s use of inconstant narration and setting, fragments of foreign languages, …show more content…

hypocrite lecteur!—mon semblable,—mon frère!” Eliot uses this to tell the reader that he or she and everyone else who takes part in society is responsible for the horrid state of the world (Davidson). His use of a foreign language in this instance deceives the reader and postpones the moment that the reader discovers that he or she is being accused, paralleling the deceptive nature of society itself.
Finally, In “The Burial of the Dead”, Eliot combines enjambment (the act of ending the lines of a poem with words that end in -ing) and a perfect iambic pentameter in order to make each line of the poem sound incomplete even though it is technically complete. This can easily be seen in the following line (Shmoop Editorial Team). April is the cruellest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain. (The Waste Land, line 1-4)
Eliot’s use of iambic pentameter introduces the reader to a familiar and structured construct much like what society initially seems to be but when the reader continues to delve into either the poem or society, he or she discovers that they are both intrinsically alienating (Shmoop Editorial

Open Document