Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the influence of the american civil war made by Lincoln
lincoln's greatest contributions
lincoln's greatest contributions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout the Civil War, Lincoln did not get much regard as a military leader. He did not have the same amount of military knowledge or experience than his Confederate partner, Jefferson Davis. But Lincoln was determined to get there. He studied military strategies and in the end became a superior expert of military tactics, better than his commanders and Jefferson Davis. James McPherson that it was ultimately Lincoln 's performance as president that guaranteed both "his success . . . as president and the very survival of the United States."5 He read and studied military history, which allowed him to observe the victories and disappointments of commanders. Our history, and an extraordinary normal strategist, a superior one than any of his …show more content…
However, numerous would contend that one of his weaknesses was his struggle with depression. His dark depressions frequently modified his dispositions however luckily, it didn 't unfavorably affect his occupation as President, yet it was unquestionably a weakness he had to deal with. Something that would trigger his depression was his son’s devastating passing in the White House and his wife 's mental instability. Lincoln took care of these issues decently well. However, he was depleted by more than simply the Civil War during his Presidency. Another weakness was that he was a poor administrator whose absence of official experience preceding the presidency regularly appeared. One of Lincoln 's significant weaknesses as a wartime leader was that he was not able to recognize good military authority. Lincoln needed to choose his commanders. He often picked various terrible ones and stayed with them too long. For example, he stayed with George McClellan even as McClellan 's absence of aggression frustrated him.
Overall, Tried by War conveys an insightful examination of Lincoln 's performance as commander in chief. . It is unmistakably realized that Abraham Lincoln was genuinely an extraordinary president with numerous qualities. It was incredibly hard choosing his weaknesses. . Obviously he committed errors, however to commit errors is not inexorably to be weak .It is almost like his weaknesses are not in any care worth discussing because his strengths completely overpower
Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, showed weaknesses within his leadership which may have contributed to the confederacy’s loss and the unions win . Davis failed in three vital ways. These ways were: his relations with other confederate authorities and with the people, as well as in his fundamental concept of his job as president and in his organization and specific handling of his role as commander in chief . Davis failed in maintaining communication with leaders and with his people, often unable to admit when he is wrong which led to lack organization in his role . In addition, Davis was a conservative leader, not a revolutionary one which meant that his strength was often in protocol and convention rather than in innovation . Studying each of these aspects that represented a weakness in Jefferson Davis’s leadership, Lincoln in comparison provided more admirable and outstanding qualities within his leadership which in many ways affected the outcome of the war
President Abraham Lincoln demanded a decisive victory. He was tired of his military leadership’s inability to decisively engage and defeat Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Allowing the war to drag on was to the Confederacies advantage. Lincoln was so frustrated that he relieved General George B. McClellan for failing to defeat Lee at Antietam, and replaced him with General Ambrose Burnside, who proved to be very conservative in battle against General Lee. Knowing that General Lee was a student of Napoleonic warfare, Burnside feared that Lee always had a large Corps in reserve waiting to flank should he be decisively engaged from the front.
Dilorenzo, Thomas J.. The Real Lincoln: a new look at Abraham Lincoln, his agenda, and an unnecessary war. Roseville, Calif: Prima, 2002
When we compare the military leaders of both North and South during the Civil War, it is not hard to see what the differences are. One of the first things that stand out is the numerous number of Northern generals that led the “Army of the Potomac.” Whereas the Confederate generals, at least in the “Army of Northern Virginia” were much more stable in their position. Personalities, ambitions and emotions also played a big part in effective they were in the field, as well as their interactions with other officers.
Williams portrays Lincoln in a very positive light, allowing the reader to realize the greatness of Lincoln, in his compassion, strategy, statesmanship and lack of ego. Williams has provided numerous instances wherein he provides ample support to his arguments and facts. In spite of the unnecessary detail and verbosity that Williams sometimes uses, there is no doubt that this book is a remarkable insight into Lincoln’s persona.
Abraham Lincoln was one of the greatest presidents to ever serve in office in the history of the U.S., serving from 1860 to 1865. A self-educated attorney from Illinois, he proved himself to be a brilliant leader throughout the Civil War period. Although President Abraham Lincoln faced the biggest crisis in American history, he saved the nation by preserving the Union during the Civil War, boosting the economy, by fighting for the abolition of slavery, and by boosting the Northern economy.
A successful army requires discipline, but Confederate soldiers refused to concede authority to anyone they did not vote for, at least in the beginning. Confederate soldiers were also prone to shirking duties they deemed menial, and some even left the army without dismissal if they believed they had served long enough. In the uppermost chain of political command, Jefferson Davis proved deficient in quelling the media outlets which railed against his decisions at nearly every turn. Davis gave deference to the right of free speech no matter how damaging it was. Donald then uses these points to highlight the Union Army and Lincoln administration’s successes. The North had the advantage of numerous immigrant conscripts who were used to being ordered around, so the pecking order was easily established from the beginning. In the political realm, Abraham Lincoln did not let Constitutional rights obstruct his goals; Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and threw defamatory journalists into prison. The Union thus had the unity it needed to achieve victory in the face of the South’s
After the second Battle of Manassas, the Army of the Potomac was demoralized and President Lincoln needed someone that could reorganize it. President Lincoln liked General McClellan personally and admired his strengths as an administrator, organizer, and drillmaster. Lincoln was aware that the soldiers loved General McClellan and had nicknamed him “Little Mac.” Knowing this, President Lincoln ordered General McClellan to “assume command of Washington, its defenses and all forces in the immediate vicinity.”1 This was not a field command but intended for General McClellan to take the returning demoralized Army and the new soldiers coming into Washington and make them a fighting force, nothing more. Lincoln knew as well that although Ge...
On paper, Davis is a superior politician to Lincoln who only has a single House term of political experience. While Davis is a career politician with a prestigious military career in the Mexican-American War, Lincoln still outperforms him. In the political sphere Lincoln is able to form a superior cabinet by choosing rival and critics who are the best at their job. While Lincoln makes friends, Davis had a tendency to make enemies with what his cabinet called an “acid tongue”. Also, Davis is a former military officer and graduate of West Point, but continually makes blunders in his military strategy. Whereas Lincoln who has next to no military experience shows that he has a profound understanding of military tactics. Abraham Lincolns surprising political and military prowess helped the union overcome the Confederacy during the Civil
Abraham Lincoln is best remembered as being America’s first war president. In the nineteenth century, the American presidency had seen nothing like the Civil War, and war was upon Lincoln before he or anyone else considered how the position of Commander-in-Chief fit into the Constitution. This resulted in an unorganized thought process and policy. Brian Dirck, author of the article “Lincoln as Commander in Chief,” writes:
When President Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) took office, he did not garner much respect from the American citizens as a military leader. Lincoln exercised actions that took his West Point generals into more aggressive territory. Even though he didn’t have the military education or experience as his counterpart Confederate President Jefferson Davis (1808-1889), he continued his abilities as a fearless leader by becoming a student of...
I feel that Lincoln might have lead this country through one of the deepest politic crisis. His style of leadership is mostly bias and after trying to find out which one he was and after looking at many type of leadership styles he is I agree with the New York Times saying that he is a exemplary leader. The reason I agree with
To begin with, Lincoln had perservenerence: he was principled yet not subjective. He was guided by a couple, key respectable standards. Among his standards was his dedication to what Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, that "all men are created equal, and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights.” Miller states that “Lincoln insisted continually not only that the 'created equal ' in the Declaration included Negroes, but that to hold otherwise, as Douglas did, and to impute such a view to the Founders, was to destroy that great document 's meaning for all Americans and all time.” (351-352 Miller)
Abraham Lincoln (12 Feb. 1809-15 Apr. 1865) the 16th president (civilwar.org) of the United States of America was one of the main public persons that influence the civil war in many aspects. Even though the civil war may have been the last resource the nation had, it could be argue that Lincoln’s governments try its best to find a different solution. The civil war was a conflict that destroyed the nation; it perhaps could have been avoided if the second party had work for a solution. But it is true that maybe both parts could have looked out for the benefits of the people as a whole instead of their personal benefits. Lincoln principal positive effect on the civil war was actually before and during the war when Lincoln’s government had many attempts to prevent the confrontation, and when this one began he took the right decisions to win the war. One of the biggest effects on the civil war was the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, which gave the slaves their liberty. Many would agree is that Abraham’s Lincoln effect on the civil war was positive but Lincoln made many mistakes or misjudgments during the war as well. Perhaps the biggest mistake Lincoln did was underestimating the South what caused many unnecessary deaths. He also did had misjudgments that cause many causalities. Since the beginning of time humanity has fought for what they thought was right. In April 12 of 1861(civilwar.org) The US would begin a fight for civic and moral rights, a civil war that perhaps was the last option for a country to reunite its values. Abraham Lincoln was the president of the time and the person the influence the most the course the war took. I strongly believe that Lincoln’s decisions influence or had more positive effects on the country. Being the president at times like the civil war is without doubt it is one of the toughest jobs, and one way or another there is going to be correct and incorrect decisions but I can agree president Lincoln did what he thought it was the best at that moment.
“Nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the morals of the people or individual oppressing them”, is the idea of Abraham Lincoln’s presidential policy. Abraham Lincoln, a Republican, pushed America towards its present ideals. Lincoln’s leadership was practical and hopeful; yet he did not press for the reality of the phrase “All Men Were Created Equal”. I would give him a grade of a B average. He had good intentions, and progressive ideas, but he did not know how to handle them or order them to be passed majority of the time. However, he led the United States through one of the bloodiest, Constitutional wars that America has been in. He proved his worthiness of President among issues such as the