“The Room” by Jean-Paul Sartre takes us on a journey through the conflict of man with the world. Eve makes the choice to sacrifice self identity to care for her mentally ill husband Pierre. In the beginning of the book “The Wall and Other Stories” Sartre invites us to interpret the text from an existentialist point of view. So we must understand Sartre philosophical meaning of life.
“What is the meaning of life?” Jean-Paul Sartre defines life as first accepting our own faults and strengths, to then understand that the world exists regardless of our actions, and it is only when we actively participate and take responsibility for our place in the world do we honestly experience life. In Sartre’s autobiography The Words he explores the concept brilliantly. As a child, Sartre was a scrawny, crossed eyed boy who retreated to solitude of reading literature and hid from the world. This did not stop the world from existing and he was living dishonestly until he used his literary talent with purpose. In this context, Eve and Pierre are hiding from their responsibility to take action in the world. Sartre uses his gift of storytelling to explain his view of the world, and living in “The Room”.
Eve’s life with Pierre is avoidance of their responsibility in the world. Eve is forced to realize that the world exist outside their dark room. Eve’s father, M. Darbedat visits every Thursday to visit, and is a weekly reminder of such. Then as her father leaves the sunlight shines through the closed blinds of the living room. She opens the window and watches her father walk out, and resents that “a little part of their life had escaped from the closed room and was being dragged through the streets, in the sun, among the people”. (30) Sh...
... middle of paper ...
... on her self-identity in order to stay connected to her husband.
Eve must decide who she is apart from her husband. She could decide to become a activist for the mentally ill, write a book on the mentally ill, or just walk out into the sunlight a let her skin be warmed. But she will not know “the meaning of life” until she finds accepts who she is. Then she must accept that the world will continue to evolve without her participation. But to truly live is to take a hand on approach and interact with the world on purpose and with responsibility.
Works Cited
Scharfstein, Ben. The Philosophers, Their Lives and the Nature of Their Thought
New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Baskin, Wade. “The Wisdom of Sartre” New York: Citadel Press, 1956.
Onof, Christian J. “Sartre’s Existentialism” February 15, 2011,
http://www.iep.utm.edu/sartre-ex/#SH5b 2004
In his lecture, Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sartre discusses common misconceptions people, specifically Communists and Christians, have about existentialism and extentanitalists (18). He wants to explain why these misconceptions are wrong and defend existentialism for what he believes it is. Sartre argues people are free to create themselves through their decisions and actions. This idea is illustrated in the movie 13 Going on Thirty, where one characters’ decision at her thirteenth birthday party and her actions afterwards make her become awful person by the time she turns thirty. She was free to make these decisions but she was also alone. Often the idea of having complete free will at first sounds refreshing, but when people
Simone de Beauvoir 's ethics is exceptionally complex. In The Ethics of Ambiguity, her ideas of "vagueness," "exposure," "common flexibility," "moral opportunity"-taking their takeoffs from Jean-Paul Sartre-interweave to frame unpredictable groups of argumentation. To these conceivable reasons we may include the basic origination of Beauvoir as only Sartre 's followers and the slow decay of existentialist scholars in academia. Sartre’s ethics, his Being and Nothingness, and the advancement of his thinking are tough subjects to handle. Yet regardless, an examination of Sartre 's ethics can start with the commonplace thoughts he displays in his Existentialism is Humanism. Beauvoir 's ethics as communicated in The Ethics of Ambiguity, then again,
the play may be pass to modern society, that one may not learn, or even
“No Exit,” by Jean-Paul Sartre, is a play that illustrates three people’s transitions from wanting to be alone in Hell to needing the omnipresent “other” constantly by their sides. As the story progresses, the characters’ identities become more and more permanent and unchangeable. Soon Inez, Garcin, and Estelle live in the hope that they will obtain the other’s acceptance. These three characters cannot accept their existentialist condition: they are alone in their emotions, thoughts and fears. Consequently, they look to other people to give their past lives and present deaths meaning. Forever trapped in Hell, they are condemned to seek the other for meaning in their lives; even when given the chance to exit the room, the characters choose to stay with each other instead of facing uncertainty and the possibility of being detached from the stability of their relationships with the others. Without other people, the characters would have no reason to exist. Each characters’ significance depends on the other’s opinion of them; Garcin needs someone to deny his cowardliness, Inez yearns for Estelle’s love, and Estelle just wants passion with no commitment. This triangle of unending want, anguish and continual disillusionment because of the other is precisely Sartre’s definition of pure Hell.
“We are left alone, without excuse. This is what I mean when I say that man is condemned to be free” (Sartre 32). Radical freedom and responsibility is the central notion of Jean-Paul Sartre’s philosophy. However, Sartre himself raises objections about his philosophy, but he overcomes these obvious objections. In this paper I will argue that man creates their own essence through their choices and that our values and choices are important because they allow man to be free and create their own existence. I will first do this by explaining Jean-Paul Sartre’s quote, then by thoroughly stating Sartre’s theory, and then by opposing objections raised against Sartre’s theory.
The four core concepts of existentialism, i.e. situatedness, despair, limitations, human agency and freedom, as well as concepts specifically designated in Sartre’s “The Humanism of Existentialism” can be found ‘in action’ within Beauvoir’s book. The situatedness of human life is explored in the way that Fosca is always set in a certain time and place that he cannot free himself from despite his immortality (215, 267). Anxiety and despair are found in many characters like Regina and Carlier when they come to realize that they will eventually perish and all they had was this one life (13, 229). Limitations are explored in many instances including Fosca’s inability to control the world in the way he wants in regards to his sons and failure to understand the world from a perspective beyond the human kind (100, 122; 276). Human agency and freedom are represented in Fosca’s ability to choose how he wants to live and interpret the life he continuously must live. In terms of bad faith, a concept described by Sartre, characters are shown as liars to themselves both in sticking too much with the facticity of their existence as well as believing that they can completely transcend the reality of their situations (167; 45). The inclusion of these multiple perspectives in the literature is beneficial beyond philosophic texts because the reader is given
Existentialism tends to focus on the question of human existence — the feeling that there is no purpose, indeed nothing, at the core of existence. The term itself suggests one major theme: the stress on concrete individual existence and, consequently, on subjectivity, individual freedom, and choice. Sartre did not believe in God, so there was no place for the essence of humanity to be before human existence. For Existentialists like Sartre, the absence of God has a much larger significance than the metaphysics of creation. Without God there is no purpose, no value, and no meaning in the world. Existentialism posits that individuals create the meaning and essence of their lives, as opposed to deities or authorities creating it for them. Meursault, the main character and narrator of The Outsider, lives existentially and knows that his life will terminate one day. To Meursault, Life is all a person possesses, and there is no intrinsic meaning in life:
Existentialism is a term that was coined specifically by Jean-Paul Sartre in regards to his own life. Sartre had adopted the Atheistic approach to life and its meaning, and while he was not the first or only one to do so, was the first and only one to come up with a way to describe it. Under Existentialism, man lives without higher power or guidance and must rely solely on himself and what he is aiming to do in order to lead a fulfilling life. This can be anything. Critics of Sartre propose that, because such a vast array of options exists within the meaningfulness of life, this philosophy is obsolete and trivial in nature. This is not true, as it is seen in everyday examples – celebrities, namely – that a thirst
We choose, act, and take responsibility for everything, and thus we live, and exist. Life cannot be anything until it is lived, but each individual must make sense of it. The value of life is nothing else but the sense each person fashions into it. To argue that we are the victims of fate, of mysterious forces within us, of some grand passion, or heredity, is to be guilty of bad faith. Sartre says that we can overcome the adversity presented by our facticity, a term he designs to represent the external factors that we have no control over, such as the details of our birth, our race, and so on, by inserting nothingness into it.
Eveline has always felt lonely ever since her mother’s death but especially now when there is nothing more she can do with her life but find someone to take her away and love her. Eveline’s desire for a better life seems like it may come true when she meets Frank who she thinks will take her away to Buenos Aires. When her chance comes along for her to leave with Frank she too pushes her chance away. She thinks that she no longer deserves a better life other than fulfilling her duties to her family and chooses to be alone for eternity.
The script’s opening image defines the film’s POV, by using the camera to subjectively identify our protagonist’s recent affliction as he awakens paralyzed from a stroke induced coma. Jean-Dominique Bauby, a.k.a. Jean-Do, is informed of his condition by the doctor. He is unable to respond to the doctor’s questions, which sets-up the conflict that he will struggle to communicate his thoughts throughout the script. As Jean-Do looks around his hospital room, we are informed by pictures and drawings beside his bed that he was a successful editor of a fashion magazine who led a comfortable and pleasurable lifestyle. There are images of his children alongside drawings that they have made for him. There is a sense of hopelessness and despair expressed through his interior monologue when he asks, “Is this life”? There are several unified themes stated in the opening pages of the script. First, there is a bell heard in the distance which informs the reader that our protagonist is trying to somehow communicate with others, but cannot do so throug...
Have you ever wondered what's the meaning of life? In “Nausea” by the french philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre has written in 1938. Roquentin at the age of thirty becomes disgusted by his own existence. Roquentin begins a diary to help him explain the strange and sickening sensations that have been bothering him of his own existence. Life bores him and tries to pass time. Roquentin sees life as meaningless because of his freedom. He sees freedom as a negative thing. His nausea attacks Roquentin sudden awareness of life’s meaninglessness and silliness. Feels nausea whenever he knows that there is “absolutely no reason for living”. Furthermore, Roquentin life is unreasonableness. He does certain things only because there is no reason for doing differently. The main theme of Roquentin is that there's no meaning in life.
“It is better to encounter your existence in disgust, then never to encounter it at all.” What Sartre is saying is that it is better to determine who you are in dissatisfaction, rather than never truly discovering yourself. Sartre’s worst fear in life would be to realize that you have never truly lived. For example, if you were to land a career that you were not interested in and you were just going through the motions of everyday life, Sartre would say that life was not a life worth living. Sartre’s goal in life was to reach the ultimate level; he said life was “Nausea” , because we are always trying to reach the next level, we are always in motion. Sartre had two theories that determine our way of life, Being-In-Itself and Being-For-Itself. Being-In-Itself is the ultimate level, if you reach this level you have fulfilled yourself completely, you have lived your life to the fullest. Being-For-Itself is where we as human beings are, we are always trying to work to become perfect. Our goal in life is to find an authentic existence, and we get there by saying no. Sartre’s philosophy of freedom is obtained by saying no, when we say no we are giving ourselves the option of what we do in our life. By saying no, we receive freedom of our life. “You should say no about every belief if there is a doubt about it.” Sartre also says our human existence is always in
With all aspects of relating the meaning of life to ones personal setting, one can find themselves still with more questions then answers. This is one aspect all discussed situations have in common. We may have found a true meaning, but it always becomes questionable as to if the right decisions were made and the right paths taken base on the outcomes that follow. Although one may never find themselves with a true understanding for the biggest ‘why’ question of them all, the pursuit is always life changing. Life has, for most, always been a choice of free will, to do with what you please. Some choose to embrace this fact and pursue meaning never once imagined, and some choose the more comfortable, yet unsatisfying one of someone already travelled.
This paper attempts to discuss the main features of existentialist views as well as dissect Sartre's Theory into two parts, analysing its merits and consequent demerit.