Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference between liberalism and conservatism
Difference between liberalism and conservatism
Difference between liberalism and conservatism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference between liberalism and conservatism
The Liberationist Motif (“Liberative Motif”)
Dr. De Le Torre makes a distinction between liberation theology and liberative theology. De Le Torre states in his Liberationist lecture when we refer to liberationist ethics we are referring to liberation theology. Liberation ethics refers to liberation theology a movement which developed during the 1960’s or early 1970’s in Latin America dealing with military dictatorship poverty etc.
According to our lecture, the question becomes, how do we live faithfully within the gospel message in the mist of violence physical and institutional violence? Liberationist according to the lecture is very Christian based and catholic in its thinking. It is calling for a liberative motif. While adopting many of the same
…show more content…
Simply stated liberation theology is Christian based in its approach. Liberative ethics/motif removes the focus on the Christianity. Unlike the first three traditional ethical motifs, which are deductive in nature, the Liberationist (Liberative) motif is applied inductively. The action informs and creates the theory. In De La Torre Social Ethics book he states ““those of us who are Hispanic participate in a liberative ethics”. (De La Torre. Latina/o Social Ethics: Moving Beyond Eurocentric Moral Thinking. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, p.92) However, what De La Torre proposes in his social ethics book is applicable to this case study. “Analyzing twentieth-century Eurocentric ethics and showing how it has a tendency to oppose marginalized communities” (De La Torre, p. 4). It is clear this case study which as recalled from gathering days is based on a true story. Is a prime example of a marginalized community. Rukkibai and her family are poor. They subject to those in power. A liberative theology resists the system of oppressive structures. With this in mind. A Liberative motif would not promote selling child so the whole family can survive. A liberative
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may
There is absolutely no human group which does no react to the changes, disturbing events and crises which the dynamics of history introduce into the physical or cultural context to which the group belongs. Any quick change, an internal or external conflict whatever, produces a crisis. To each crisis, society responds by slowly developing new forms and new means to bring about balance within the limits of the particular cultural group. Sometimes the crises and wounds are so serious that they threaten the vey existence of the group. Their whole existence seems to be on the line. In such a case, the most secret and active forces in their whole culture are mobilized so as to develop adequate means for their liberation. These means are the forces of religious life.
From these convictions, the idea of black liberation theology was created. Blacks relate Christianity to the struggles they have endured, therefore it has to be black. “In a society where men are defined on the basis of color of the victims, proclaiming that the condition of the poor is incongruous with him who has come to liberate us.”
The conflict between the overwhelming presence of the essent as a whole and man’s violent being-there creates the possibility of downfall into the issueless and placeless: disaster. But disaster and the possibility of disaster do not occur only at the end, when a single act of power fails, when the violent one makes a false move; no, this disaster is fundamental, it governs and waits in the conflict between violence and the overpowering. Violence against the preponderant power of being must shatter against being, if being rules in its essence, as physics, as emerging power(98).
In different circumstances using violence on behalf of religion has aided a reformation, or the spreading of the gospel. Other times, millions of people have died due to resistance. Some situations call for violence and others do not. However, there is a failsafe way of determining whether violence should be used on behalf of religion, or not.
[3] Encyclopedia of American Religious History, Revised Edition, Vol. II. “Religious violence.” Edward L. Queen II. Page 601. 2001.
Abolishing War? An appeal to Christian Leaders and Theologians is on the pro side of the abolishing war argument. The document argues that we need to find a non-violent alternative to war. It uses the “teaching of Jesus Christ which summons Christians to renounce war and to seek with the wider and religious and human communities to develop alternatives to protect the innocent, to restrain, to restrain aggressors and to overcome injustice”. This specific article
Theme in “Defender of the Faith” can be interpreted in many varying ways, some of which are life-long lessons and others to the relation between faith and the individual.
Liberation theology was considered both a radical and political movement in Roman Catholic Theology. It proposes the fight of poverty and goes in depth into the relationship of Christian theology and political activism. It interpreted Jesus’ teachings in relation to liberation through economic, political and social conditions. Liberation Theology spoke on how the Christian church should act in order to bring social change as well as support itself with the working group. It also explains how the church should be a movement for people who were denied their rights which resulted in poverty and being stripped of human beings. Liberation theology also caused up rise in which many important people involved in Christianity did not approve of it.
Explain the meaning and significance of the following statement by Gutiérrez, and demonstrate its relationship to a comprehensive view of liberation, (including the danger of reductionism), and the importance of the preferential option for the poor : "The present life is considered to be a test: one’s actions are judged and assessed in relation to the transcendent end. The perspective here is moralistic, and the spirituality is one of flight from this world" (p. 84).
With the use of the word Jihad by men such as Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden, many people believe that Jihad highlights the violent nature of Muslim people. However, in its pure form, Islam is not at all violent. Muslims are taught to fulfill Jihad through four methods: the heart, the tongue, the hand, and the sword (Jihad 2). The first is the internal struggle to cleanse oneself of internal evil. Fulfilling Jihad through heart and hand are directed more toward supporting what is right and correcting which is wrong. Raising the sword in defense of Islam is only prescribed when all other methods have failed and Muslims have come under attack. A passage in the Quran, the holy book of Islam, states, "Fight for the sake of God those that fight against you, but do not attack them first. God does not love the aggressors"(Van Voorst 311). However, there ...
Liberation Theology is a movement within the Catholic religion in Latin America that began around 1973 with the publication of A Theology of Liberation by Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutierrez (Hadjor). It is a unique theology, because it is one of the people. The Catholic Church in Latin America began with Spanish colonization, and has since become an integral part of the culture. There were many monks and nuns in the Church that aided in grassroots social change. However, the greater institution of the Church- a major landowner in many countries- has sided with oppressive conservative regimes that respect its power. Rather than deny the religion as a result of the oppressive institution, the proponents of liberation theology have claimed the Catholic Church as their own. They claim that Jesus was a radical liberator fighting for the interests of the poor, and that the Church should reflect this.
In a book “A Liberation Theology” writer Gustavo Gutierrez, Gustavo Gutierrez argues that salvation of both political and spiritual liberation, and that Christianity requires a preferential option for the poor. Also Gutierrez says that Liberation theology argues justification on the image of Jesus. Jesus is called “Christ the Liberator” because he was obedient to the father and attempted to end world suffering and was willing to die for his friends.
The focus of The Women’s Liberation Movement was idealized off The Civil Rights Movement; it was founded on the elimination of discriminary practices and sexist attitudes (Freeman, 1995). Although by the 1960s women were responsible for one-third of the work force, despite the propaganda surrounding the movement women were still urged to “go back home.” However the movement continued to burn on, and was redeveloping a new attitude by the 1970s. The movement was headed by a new generation that was younger and more educated in politics and social actions. These young women not only challenged the gender role expectations, but drove the feminist agenda that pursued to free women from oppression and male authority and redistribute power and social good among the sexes (Baumgardner and Richards, 2000).
...against oppressors I must recognized that I am being oppressed. I also must learn to change my attitudes towards my oppressors and change the way I am responding and thinking.