Legal Aspects of Fire Protection Unit III Research Paper

798 Words2 Pages

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire is a tragedy that could have been avoided had what today is considered criminal actions not taken place, and it has continued to be a history lesson that has led to the adoption of new laws and regulations since 1911. On March 25, 1911 a fire was reported at the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York City (Drehle, 2006). As the horse drawn engines arrived, they could only watch “helplessly and in horror as dozens of workers screamed from the ninth-floor windows” (Drehle, 2006, p. 93). The workers of the garment factory, mostly women, “were trapped by flames, a collapsed fire escape and a locked door” (Drehle, 2006, p. 93). The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire resulted in the loss of 146 lives and the owners, Isaac Harris and Max Blanck, facing trial for the charge of manslaughter (Drehle, 2006). The trial would serve as a landmark case, which provided a foundation for the creation of new workers protection laws as well as a common battle cry of the pro labor movement of the time, despite the surprising court decision in the case.
In 1911 New York City was an industrial empire with a wide array of factories and immigrants to perform the hard work. Many young women sought trades in which they had familiarity, which made garment factories a desirable job for women who could sew. In 1911 few labor laws existed, as do today; labor was cheap and high production was the order of business. Carefree hiring of immigrants often resulted in a large amount of theft from businesses, which affected profits, so business owners took action to prevent theft from his or her business. Isaac Harris and Max Blanck were no different than other business owners wishing to make a profit; they locked doors to prevent theft, all...

... middle of paper ...

...he workplace. In the Coconut Grove trial it was established that “the essence of wanton or reckless conduct is intentional conduct, by way either of commission or omission where there is a duty to act, which conduct involves a high degree of likelihood that substantial harm will result to another” (Varone, 2012, p. 136). In the Coconut Grove trial the defendants were properly found guilty however, in the Triangle trial an opportunity for justice was missed.

References
Drehle, D. V. (2006, August). Uncovering the History of the Triangle Shirtwaist FireRead more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/uncovering-the-history-of-the-triangle-shirtwaist-fire-124701842/#ixzz2qitMafhG Uncovering the history of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. Smithsonian.
Varone, J. C. (2012). Legal considerations for fire & emergency services (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar.

Open Document