Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
strengths and weakness personal assessment
Reflecting on leadership styles
strengths and weakness personal assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: strengths and weakness personal assessment
High Tech Engineering (HTE) is a small family owned company that fifty years old and manufactures small components for the aircraft industry. The founder and president found his successor Harold Barelli who envisioned that the company could become renowned through improving its technology and implementing advanced management approaches within the organization. He went on a campaign to make the employees aware of his vision and plastered it everywhere around the company. Over three years he began to implement several major changes in an effort to make progress toward his vision, but it had the opposite effect. An environment of instability was created around the organization because these changes were crafted by Harold and a “select few of his senior managers” therefore causing the perception that his vision came from the top down. This led to confusion due to an imbalance of responsibilities and employee engagement. The situation was worsened by the employee’s perception of Harold …show more content…
There is nothing wrong with his vision, but it does not fit the company. The organization that I work for has a vision of becoming the world’s best hospital, but I laugh at it because it is in a small community. Similarly to Harold’s vision, it may just not be feasible, but that does not make it wrong. My employer has now been bought out and is own by two large healthcare systems and has been given resources that are unimaginable by a small community hospital. The leaders at my work know and realize that they may never be the best hospital in the world, but they have progressed toward that goal by building from the base and expanding. Harold, on the other hand, has failed to do this because he ignored the company’s foundation and attempted to start over in the wrong direction. This is why Harold has failed to implement his vision within the
Elite Engineering has been unable to successfully implement change because they haven’t been able to get the employees to see the need for the change and to believe in the change. “It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things.” (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) Change is often met with resistance. When it comes down to it many people fear change. At Elite Engineering, the engineers were happy with the way things were being run. They enjoyed the billable work they were doing and did not want to take the time to collaborate with others, as it would take away time from their billable work. The engineers saw the billable work they were doing as a way to ensure they received their bonus at the end of the year. However, they were failing to see that the litigation business was going to begin to shrink and in order for them to remain competitive, changes needed to be made. Kotter and Schlesinger state that there are for common reasons that people resist change. The four reasons are the desire not to lose something of value, a misunderstanding of the change and its implications, a belief that the change does not make sense for the organization, and a low tolerance for change. (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) At Elite Engineering, I think upper management was unsuccessful at implementing change because the employees didn’t want to lose their bonuses (something of value to them), they misunderstood the change, and they didn’t feel that the change made sense for the organization.
The company's management put a lot of emphasis on taking care of its employees, encouraging an entrepreneurial spirit, treating each other with respect, and being committed
“People always overestimate how complex business is. This isn’t rocket science. We’ve chosen one of the world’s most simple professions.” In Jack Welch’s words, business is simple. A leader needs to supply his employees with the information, the resources, the vision, and the atmosphere to succeed and reward them when they do. Welch does not concern himself with the details of GE’s many business units; he only needs to ma...
As CEO of the Andrews Company, my responsibilities were to operate my company in all fields including Marketing, R&D, financing and Production. As CEO, I followed certain steps to the of best my knowledge in order to ensure the success of each department and company as a whole. In the process of utilizing every skill possible, products were introduced to meet the demand of my Niche Cost Leader Strategy. My requirement for utilizing the Niche Cost Leader Strategy was for my company to focus on the traditional and low-end segments by automating in mass production in order to keep costs down for my company. My company’s agenda was not to compete with the latest technology advancements but to focus more on cost savings that will in terms provide
The Chrysler Company had observable artifacts such as the executive tower set apart from the engineers which indicates a Hierarchical Value framework. This is where everyone below the CEO is subordinate to someone (Colette L. Meehan, n.d.) With this structure there is middle m...
In asking the consulting firm for assistance, President Paul Willard stated that the main issue within the organization was a “power struggle between people and departments.” This is precisely where the issues in both the sales and production departments are stemming from. After analyzing the situation, several issues can be pointed out in the sales department, the first being the leadership style of sales executive vice-president Ernie Lane, the second being the dramatic shift in the work force, and the third being the lack of motivation and compensation to maintain morale, satisfaction, and productivity. Most importantly, all the problems are
The business world is like a narrow bridge, all it takes is one wrong step and you fall off the edge. These executives are some of the greatest minds in their industries achieving rapid success, but end up driving the train off course. In this article Derailed, author Tim Irvin narrates the collapse of six high-profile CEOs (Robert Nardelli, Carly Fiorina, Durk Jager, Steven Heyer, Frank Raines and Dick Fuld) and the components that drove their depositions. The failure of character is a common issue along with deficits in authenticity, humility, self-management and courage. This article ultimately explains that derailment is foreseen long before the collapse. What we learn is how derailment occurs and how to avoid train wrecks in our own professions.
Organizational change, particularly large-scale change, becomes part of the company’s history; therefore, it is crucial that senior leadership plan the change thoroughly. Planning may include understanding the current state of the organization, the external and internal environment, and identifying the organization’s long-term vision simultaneously. Choosing the right approach is significant in the change process as it may be true with British Airlines’ wildcat strike blunder. This blunder is now added to British Airway history where they lost 40 million pounds because of an oversight. Ideally, changes in the organization will have minimal employee impact and operational disruption; however, this is not the case with British Airways when
...world has become extremely fast and full of change. If the leader can’t adapt to changing conditions, it is very possible for his firm to be kicked out of the game. How can the firm change, though? The most effective way is to go through new ideas. Here, it reminders me Welch’s famous saying: "Change before you have to."
Nowadays, organizational change has a serious implication for the survival of an organization (Furst & Cable, 2008). Change is critical, necessary, and has becomes a key factor to win the game.
Whether or not a company is attains acclaimed success lies not in the fact that it spends huge amounts of money on Research and Development, rather, and as stated by Bauer and Erdogan (2010), success is determined principally by the people within hat specific organization; they are the assets whose output resonates wit he company’s success. However, while this is an established fact, it is also important to state that both the organization and the people who constitute it mutual impact arriving at collective success. Therefore, as Bauer & Erdogan (2010) continue to assert, it is necessary to understand how people relate at work both at the individual and group levels, and how the organization is impacted by this interrelationship. This is what Bauer & Erdogan (2010), define as organizational behavior. It informs on what is wrong, and what is correct; essentially assisting one as an employee become ore engaged in work. Leadership or governance is one of the constituent components of organizational behavior. More often than not, it is usually associated with power, ethos, and cultural inclinations of the organization. This paper seeks to examine in-depth, management problems associated with leadership and governance at Hewlett-Packard and how it impacts on the company’s organizational culture and behavior.
“Without change there is no innovation, creativity, or incentive for improvement. Those who initiate change will have a better opportunity to manage the change that is inevitable.” William Pollard’s, a 20th century physicist, words show us the power of being proactive, and igniting change to strengthen a company’s productive climate (Sellers, Boone, Harper, 2011). Acme Airlines flight attendants lacked incentive to improve the quality of their work, as a result of distrustful management and overall frustration within the company. Acme took successful steps to rebuild their FA program into a more relationship oriented work environment. Through an understanding of effective leadership, we will use the
CrysTel is a telecommunications company that exists in a very dynamic environment, and it has the need for all aspects of itself to be dynamic and able to change relatively quickly. The upper management recently realized that CrysTel has the need to bring more products and services into its portfolio. That means that everybody who works for the company needs to be good at analyzing the best way to change, implementing a change, and sustaining the change. It also means that CrysTel employees need to change with the organization. In order for all of the employees to be good at the constant change that will be happening and be as dynamic as they need to be, they have to have good and dynamic leaders and managers to aid in the effort. Without the support from above, the employees will probably lose focus and the desire to see the company succeed (Miller et al, 2004). If the company does not prepare well, it might experience a high turnover rate as well. A study conducted by Lester Coch and John R.P. French showed that if a group of workers was not prepared for a change properly, that group exhibited a high turnover rate (Krietner & Kinicki, 2003).
All employees have a vision and idea about the future it helps everyone deal and reach their goals in difficult times. At times transformational leaders may tend to depend on their passions and fail to realize reality and
Typically, this is not a healthy approach to take especially if the organization is already an established one with structures and guidelines that all employees are laid to follow (Miller, 2012). From this point of view, Josh is very unprofessional and his case evidently reconfirms the global mantra on employees within the millennial age bracket. It is then true that the millennial generation has a rather skewed approach to the attainment of their desires, with a construed imagination of success that is not respective of planning and assessment of risks. Josh after mentioning his suggestions to Sarah and she turn’s them down due budget inefficiencies; he takes a bolder step and approaches the CEO with the same idea. Fact is, regardless of whether or not his ideas were good, it needed a determination of that, done through concept assessment and evaluation. Critically, the behaviors and the manner in which Josh handles his employment is not so fairly warranted and it can only be fair if a conception of this and such ideas and approaches are alluded as null and irrelevant hence the assumption that generation Y’s attitude in the workplace are not so good for growth in any given