Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on developing a curriculum to provide second language acquisition
Essay on developing a curriculum to provide second language acquisition
Essay on developing a curriculum to provide second language acquisition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The need for developing the speaking skills is of primary importance in any language and it deserves even more importance in the case of learning English as a second language. This article explains the two prominent approaches of structural competency and the communicative competency in teaching and learning English. The various steps involved in teaching the spoken skills in English in the students through the structural approach as well as the communicative approach are dealt in detail. The ways in which these two approaches can be integrated to develop the spoken skills is also analyzed. Language learning through structural approach and language acquisition through communicative approach are explicated in this article.
The specific
…show more content…
Until recent years all study of language was based on the written rather than the spoken word. Where speech differed from writing, the usual attitude was and still is that speech is slovenly or careless. The feeling that good speech should conform to good writing was drummed into most of us, consciously or unconsciously from our childhood. It can be perceived that most linguists now prefer to study the spoken forms of the language. They justify the oral approach. The notion behind it is that speech must have preceded writing. They declare that writing must have been an attempt to represent the language that was spoken. So it is logical that the development of the skill of speaking should get primary importance in any language. The individual development of language skills and the differences between forms and functions and also the methods practised in these deserve a close study.
Perspectives of Developing Speaking Skills When we study people, it seems that some have acquired the art of conversational skills naturally by listening to others and through exposure where as some have developed it through practice and
…show more content…
So we have to exploit both their natural learning and their skill-learning capacities. Further these two kinds of learning might be integrated into one framework which can then form the basis of our methodology. Natural language acquisition of ones owns mother tongue seems to be an automatic and easy phenomenon. But when speech is formally taught in the case of a second language, it seems more difficult.
Contexts of Speaking In whatever contexts we talk, we need to keep in mind our audience and the effect our speech may have on them. Here two approaches to the development of oral communication skills need close attention. First, learning language as a skill in the classroom and second, developing spoken skills through exposure and use.
Learning Language as a Skill: Structural Competence This deals with three main aspects which belong to the learning of a skill.
1. Learners have to become aware of the key features of the target performance, so as to make the mental plans necessary to produce it.
2. They have to practice converting these plans into actual behaviour, so that in due course the basic concept plans can operate automatically, in response to higher level
Although language acquisition may become harder to acquire as a person gets older, it is not completely impossible. T...
Over the past fifty years ago, followed the prevailing theory see Plato, saying that language is an innate ability ...
When people learn a second language, they are sometimes influenced by features of their L1, which is called “a transfer from L1”. The transfer can be divided into two types: a positive transfer and a negative transfer. The positive transfer is thought that an influence from L1 works positively in a language acquisition and can facilitate L2 acquisition. On the other hand, the negative transfer is considered that an influence of some features L1 work negatively and can interfere with language acquisition. Therefore, the negative transfer is also called “interference”. The transfer from L1 is likely to occur in a variety of areas of language such as phonology, vocabulary, morphology, syntax and semantics. Secondly, we pay attention to that L2 acquisition also have a developmental sequence. In common with a child who acquires L1, L2 learners develop the acquisition in a certain order. Moreover, Shirahata (2010) mentions that L2 learners follow a similar acquisition order of some grammatical items even in the case of L2 leaning in a classroom. He also pays attention to the fact that some grammatical items that one learner has trouble in learning are similarly difficult for other learners even though teachers, the way to teach and textbook are different. This fact suggests L2 acquisition in a classroom setting has a certain acquisition order.
There is a growing body of research into how a learner’s (human or machine) goals can greatly influence the learning process. Study has taken place in fields such as cognitive science, psychology, education and, of most interest to us, artificial intelligence. Prior to the interest in goal-driven learning, most studies in this field focused on providing estimated functions based on limited inputs and outputs, without concern for the learning goal.
The author opens up the article with general idea that it is important for classroom teachers to know how to identify the myths and misconceptions in kids learning second language. Then, McLaughlin brings up the first myth- Children learn second languages quickly and easily. In this myth, the author breaks the
This essay is going to illustrate the different stages in language acquisition that children pass through and elicit the theories in accordance.
Language acquisition is perhaps one of the most debated issues of human development. Various theories and approaches have emerged over the years to study and analyse this developmental process. One factor contributing to the differing theories is the debate between nature v’s nurture. A question commonly asked is: Do humans a...
Students must consider that they are able to complete their school task. It is very important to develop the sense of self-efficiency for students for receives confidence building.
- Have positive attitudes towards mistakes and learning from mistakes which helps them maintain both fluency and accuracy.
Speaking is one of the most difficult skills language learners have to face. In spite of this, educators and teachers of English have spent all our classroom time attempting to teach our learners how to write, to read and sometimes even to listen in a second language because grammar has a long written tradition (Bueno, Madrid &Mclaren, 2006). Most of the teacher’s attempt was to expanding the approaches which could improve learners’ speaking
How do children acquire language? What are the processes of language acquisition? How do infants respond to speech? Language acquisition is the process of learning a native or a second language. Although how children learn to speak is not perfectly understood, most explanations involve both the observations that children copy what they hear and the inference that human beings have a natural aptitude for understanding grammar. Children usually learn the sounds and vocabulary of their native language through imitation, (which helps them learn to pronounce words correctly), and grammar is seldom taught to them, but instead that they rapidly acquire the ability to speak grammatically. Though, not all children learn by imitation alone. Children will produce forms of language that adults never say. For example, “I spilled milk on hisself” or “Debbie wants a cookie”. This demonstrates that children have the desire to speak correctly and have self-motivating traits to communicate. This supports the theory of Noam Chomsky (1972)-that children are able to learn grammar of a particular language because all intelligible languages are founded on a deep structure of universal grammatical rules that corresponds to an innate capacity of the human brain. Adults learning a second language pass through some of the same stages, as do children learning their native language. In the first part of this paper I will describe the process of language acquisition. The second part will review how infants respond to speech.
The study of language development, one of the most fascinating human achievements, has a long and rich history, extending over thousands of years (Chomsky, 2000). As the nature-versus-nurture argument is inevitable to arise whenever human behaviors are discussed, it is not surprising that language experts have debated the relative influences of genetics and the environment on language development (Hulit & Howard, 2002). Among the various proposals concerning the mechanisms involved in acquiring a language, two opposing theoretical positions, the behaviorist and the nativist, are the most prominent and influential ones (Ayoun, 2003; Garton & Pratt, 1998; Owens, 2001). Due to the indefinite explanation of the exact process, the continuous interest of the inquiring people, and the sheer significance of the precise result, the controversy remains ongoing and popular. In view of the more obvious limitations of the behaviorist interpretation and the prevailing contributions of the nativist interpretation, the latter one is more rational to accept.
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
Language acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language with natural communication while children are acquiring the foreign language. Children usually concerned with message which they are conveying and understand not with the form of utterances. These utterances are initiated by the acquired systems and the fluency of language is based on what we have ‘picked up’ through active communication. Both formal knowledge and conscious learning of the second language learning may be alternate to the output of the system, sometimes before and sometimes after the
Speaking is a natural ability given to most reluctant individuals. Since the beginning of time, it has been assumed that we have a right to speak and use words, thus we naturally begin our development of language during the early stages of live. After years of grasping and perfecting our vocabulary and language, it seems unnecessary to study the purpose of our development. Why, then, should we study “oral communication?” There are many purposes, benefits, and institutions that branch from oral communication. Of course, communication is the basis of interaction with other individuals through the use of expressions and words; however, through studying oral communication, one can take the words and expressions being used and apply them to his or her own life. After all, the most effective and useful knowledge is applied knowledge.