Leadership vs Management
Intro & Purpose of Study
Concepts of leadership and management tend to be on ongoing topic in higher education. When you look into departments at any given university you will notice that student staff is considered Leaders but there title is manager. “ The word manager usually indicates that the individual so labeled holds a directive post in an organization, presiding over the processes by which the organization functions, allocating resources prudently and making the best possible use of people”(Gardner, 1990,p. 3). Leadership and management has become continues research topic that can and has become a controversial issue at times. (Moyles, date) The notion that managers can easily learn to be leaders, and leaders, through some unexplained quality, can both lead and manage is well represented in the literature. If that is the case why do we continue to have the discussion on how leadership is more ideal than management?
Gardner (1990) I once heard it said of a man, He’s an utterly first class manager but there isn’t a trace of the leader in him; I am still looking for that man, and I am beginning to believe that he does not exist. Every time I encounter utterly first class managers they turn out to have quite a lot of the leader in them. (p. 4).
“One cannot manage change. One can only be ahead of it” (Drucker, 1999, p.75). Throughout every class that I have had so far there has been one common topic “Leadership”, but what is leadership? And how does one become a leader? How are you supposed to tell the difference between a leader and a good manager? These are some common questions that tend to come up when having discussions about leadership. We tell students and staff that they future leaders. But ...
... middle of paper ...
... and management style throughout this study. Using the “Theory A” model two executives lacked balance and failed. The third executive is currently struggling to balance leadership and management, while executive four is balancing leadership and management demonstrated in “Theory A” and is currently successful (Williams,1997). William’s study shows to prove that for one to be success in life they must learn how to balance management and leadership by, thinking of the rationalist as personifying management in the 20th century (Williams,1997).
(Williams, 1997) Thus, the challenge for managers and leaders, if they are to negotiate the horns of this dilemma, is to navigate the entire management- leadership continuum using the compass of awareness. This journey begins inwardly, for there in reside the key management- leadership partners, the animus and the anima (p.468).
On this evidence analysis paper about the speech “Leaders and Managers” by Hugh Nibley to the BYU graduated class of 1984, Nibley put all his efforts to motivate the graduated class of the necessity in the world of real leaders and not just merely managers. For this purpose, Nibley started by explaining the hidden history behind the shift of leaders for managers in the world through historical evidence. Also, Nibley explained the basic division between these two characters leaders and managers using clear and consistent explanations. Moreover, the author expressed the different nature of managers and leaders in society with evidence, through examples in the earthly Christian history, societies of The Book of Mormon, and the current society. Furthermore, Nibley used some opposing views to show the mistake of having pure management skills, but also the necessity of having some managerial skills as an essential factor of leadership. Also, in the speech of “Leader and Managers” by Nibley, it was difficult to find a concrete fallacy or to assume that the author used fallacies because of the clear
Bennis, Walter (1997). Learning To Lead: A Workbook on Becoming A Leader, pg. 9, Perseus Books, Addison/Wesley
In this document I will share how I was influenced to believe in my own ability. I will also share how my view about management and leadership was changed in one conversation and how that conversation boosted my confidence. I will also share the manager that influenced my learning the most and how through not just words but also actions he showed me that being a leader is not being the person sitting in an office barking instructions, but being the leader is someone who keeps motivating his team to want to accomplish more and be more through actions. I will also share my learning through this assignment, and recommendations on fixing
The systematic and scholarly study of leadership consumed much of the twentieth century and continues to remain a vital topic of discussion today. Theories abound as to what makes one a good leader and, despite the continued efforts of many, no single operable expression of the meaning of leadership exists. In an attempt to address this issue James Kotterman wrote, “Leadership Versus Management: What’s the Difference.” The following review shall briefly summarize Kotterman’s article and follow with conclusions based on the experiences of this author.
Organ, D.W. (1996) "Leadership: The great man theory revisited", Business horizons, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1-4.
‘Leadership’ and ‘Management’ are two commonly using words in nowadays organizations. The essential and integral part of productive management is leadership. Effective leadership is crucial to an organization’s success. Leaders can take a quantity of different steps to help keep projects from failing. The main and highly important focus of the leader is to make things happen. According to Griffin (2008), ‘Leadership, as a process, the use of non coercive influence to shape the group’s or organization’s goals, motivate behaviour toward the achievement of those goals, and help define group or organizational culture; as a property, the set of characteristics attributed to individuals who are perceived to be leaders’. Equally as management, that
Leadership is the ability of a superior to influence the behaviour of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action (Barnard, 1938).It is the ultimate act which brings to success all of the potent potential that is in an organisation and its people and it transforms potential to reality (LEADERSHIP THEORIE...
Webster 's Dictionary defines leadership as "the power or ability to lead other people," and a manager as “a person who directs a team and is in charge of a business or department” (Webster, n.d.). Although, these are great definitions this paper will take a deeper look into what leaders and managers are, what leadership means as a visionary, what leadership means as a problem-solver, and what leadership means as a team-builder. Moreover, what are the most interesting aspects gained from our text through the first five weeks and how each aspect will be applied to a work environment.
What is leadership? Leadership is having the ability to give guidance to those that will follow. Those that follow will help to complete the mission. Leadership is a soft science, just as anthropology, sociology and psychology. It cannot be proven exactly what it is. Leadership is an art, the skillful application of leadership behaviors beyond techniques is much the same as the skillful application of brushstrokes by a master painter. Leadership is both rational and emotional. It involves both sides of human experience. It includes actions and influences based on reason and logic as well those based on inspiration and passion. Leadership is a social process shared among all members of a group. Leadership development comes through experience. We all learn from our different experiences. Whether positive or negative, they are our tools for growth and development.
The phrase “leader” versus “manager.” is used to show and compere how Leading is related to managing, Bennis and Nanus (1985:21) help us understand the broader role of supervision in their discussion of management and leadership: “To be a manager is to bring about, to accomplish, to have charge of, responsibility for, to conduct. Leading, on the other hand, is influencing, guiding in direction, course, action, opinion.” They go on to say that managers are people who “do things right,” and leaders are people who “do the right things.” Managers are more efficiency driven and focus on mastering routine activities, while leaders are driven by vision and judgment. Managers tend to be bean counters, while leaders focus on achieving desired results.
Managers have leadership qualities; Yet not all managers are leaders. This course has allowed me to challenge myself and learn about my strengths and weaknesses in a leadership role. Exploring the main three practices which include managing ethics and diversity, challenging the process and enabling others to act. This report is an analytical study of the leadership practices mentioned above; while exploring leadership practices, ways to improve them and new innovative ideas.
Stroup, J. (2004). Managing leadership: toward a new and usable understanding of what leadership is and how to manage it. Lincoln, NE. iUniverse, Inc. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/09/04/great-man-theory/
Management and leadership are very important functions in getting a job done. In Peter Drucker`s statement “Management is doing things right and leadership is doing the right things”, doing things right means being able to perform well, whilst doing the right things is knowing what exactly what to do inorder to perform well. Management is associated with efficiency, and involves coordinating people's efforts and the allocation of resources to maximize productivity whilst leadership is to effectiveness, which involves directing and inspiring people to achieve set goals (Sterling, 2014). Leadership and management are different but are closely linked functions: each is complimentary to the other and is essential in ensuring change in achieving strategic goals and in boosting team performance (SmallBizConnect, 2012). In this paper, I will explain why knowing yourself and understanding others form the basis for efficient management and effective leadership, and how these concepts can be improved upon. In addition, I would explore how management and leadership complement each other in pragmatic leadership and the great debaters.
The case study and readings in this class have painted a clear picture of the various ways one can be a leader, the catalyst that has inspired the least likely to lead to action and the many different capacities in which one is a leader. From the parent whose child is the victim of abuse to the CEO of a major corporation, leadership can spring forth and blaze trails never imagined by others. I learned that on my journey to executive leadership, I can begin leading in my current capacity as an analyst. I do not need to wait to be given the “thumbs up” to lead, as I can be a leader in many ways everyday. Leadership is not about magnificent speaking or major endeavors, “it is about coping with change” (Kotter, p.31, 2003). We all are subject to situation dealing with change daily, it is all about how we cope with it and how others interpret and accept our coping skills.
Leadership and management are two fundamental concepts which are involved in the effective management of organizations. Leadership in my opinion is a complex concept, which includes association of human qualities and the result of their activities. To be a great leader means not only following own visions, but also work towards company’s goals.