Law of the Jungle

1402 Words3 Pages

Introduction

The term “Law of the Jungle” is an expression often meaning “every man for himself,” “survival of the fittest” or “anything goes.” A term that also referred to as the time period prior to the Wagner Act enacted in 1935. A time in which collective bargaining existed in theory but not fairly practice between unions and employers. When practiced fairly, collective bargaining allows workers to achieve a form of democracy within the workplace; thus allowing for a form of rules to be upheld by both the employer and the employees. Unions have given employees a platform in which their voices will be heard. This paper will provide an overview of both the pre-Wagner Act days and the influential post 1932 collective bargaining statutes, as well as the advisability of eliminating the post-1932 statutes.

Pre 1932

From the beginning of labor unions we have seen dramatic ups and downs resulting in almost complete devastation on various occasions. Union membership started out strong with 300,000 members in 1836, but fell drastically to only 50,000 members in 1878 following the countries deep five year economic depression. As a result of unions weakening, employers began to turn against what was left of the organized labor unions. They engaged in frequent lockouts, hired spies to ferret out union sympathizers, circulated the names of such sympathizers to fellow employers creating black-lists, and engaged the service of strikebreakers on a widespread scale. (Slone/Witney, 2010) In response to such attacks by the employers, both unionists and nonunionized workers retaliated. Secret societies were formed were formed, the most infamous Molly Maguires were known for their murders and acts of arson. Unfortunately most...

... middle of paper ...

...e is a need for to find, not an alternative to labor-management relations, but ways of improving/updating the exiting process.

Works Cited

Gold, M. & Verrier, R. (2009, February 26). Jay Leno Hauled Before Writers Guild Trial Committee. Los Angeles Times.

Grablesky, J. (2007). A new alliance in New York State: A progress report on the labor movement’s restructuring, capacity building, and programmatic work. Retrieved September 29, 2010 from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/88/

Sloane, A. & Witney, F. (2010). Labor Relations. (Thirteen Edition) Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Taft-Hartley Act. Distributed by the Labor Education & Research Center University of Oregon. Retrieved September 23, 2010 from http://www.nalc1414.org/Taft-Hartly.pdf

Open Document