Land Systems Change: Land System Change

2000 Words4 Pages

One of the pie slices that make a large impact on the biodiversity of the world is land system change. Land-system change is measured in the percent of forested area compared to the original forested area. The boundary for the amount of forested area that the world needs before we begin to experience issues is 75%, approximately 85% of the tropical biome, 50% of the temperate biome needs to be covered for the world to function properly with minimal issues in relation to land system use. Currently we are at 62% of the earth’s potential forested areas surviving. ("Earth Has Crossed Several ‘Planetary Boundaries,’ Thresholds of Human-Induced Environmental Changes", 2016) We are 13% under the amount of forest cover we need for the earth to be able …show more content…

Another part of land system change is how the land is being used and misused. One way that we are misusing the earth is though mining. Mining in Australia is one of the countries’ largest industries and is a large contributor to the economy. Australia is one of the leading suppliers of many minerals such as; gold, aluminum, bauxite, opal, iron, copper, zinc and coal along with many others. (Mining in Australia) In Western Tasmania there is a river called The King River, and because of the Mt. Lyell Mining for copper, it has become one of the most polluted rivers in Australia. Not only did it have to deal with 100 years of direct pollution from the mining being done on Mt. Lyell, but it is also expected to continue to be affected for 600 years after the closing of the mine, more and more copper and sulfuric acid enter river and surrounding areas everyday (Fergusson 238). Along the King River there are ‘trailing beaches’ that contain both …show more content…

The companies do not try to find a sustainable way to get rid of the waste they just decide to let it leak into the ground and pollute everything in its path. Leaving the government to pay to have the problem solved (Lloyd, M. V., G. B., Doherty, M. D., Jeffree, R. A., John, J., Majer, J. D., . . . Nichols, O. G. 5-6) Instead of trying to save some time in the long run and make sure that the mine wasn’t going to affect the biodiversity and environment in the long run they just did whatever they wanted how they wanted. Because of the severity of the pollution in the King River there is no way for neither the Tasmanian nor the Australian governments to be able to put up the resources needed to clean the river. They are relying on the river to purify itself over time. (Fergusson 239) Just because a mine is closed doesn’t mean that the runoff issue is solved because when it rains the rain runoff bring more of the pollution down to the river basins. To fix the problem we need to either finish extracting all of the metals from the mine site or neutralize the acid at the source. (EPA Tasmania) Tasmania as a community isn’t letting the trailing issue go. They are still actively trying to find a solution in 2014 and the mine closed in 1970.

Open Document