Laetrile Essay

1685 Words4 Pages

Laetrile – is it worth the risk?

It is of no doubt that cancer is a disease that affects an alarming number of people and their families each year. In 2008, about 12·7 million people were diagnosed with cancer around the world1. Cancer’s turmoil is not only confined to patients and their families, but also stems throughout the health care system as its global economic cost is more than AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria combined1. The costs of treatments such as chemotherapy are extremely expensive and significantly add to this figure. Hence, it is of no surprise that alternative treatments for cancer have become increasingly common, as an adjunct, or even an alternative, to orthodox cancer treatment regimens that tend to be rather costly and do not guarantee positive effects.

One of these alternative methods is the use of Laetrile; a semi-synthetic form of Amygdalin. Amygdalin is a compound that can be isolated from the seeds of many fruits such as peaches, bitter almonds and apricots. It is important to acknowledge that both laetrile and amygdalin have a common structural component, mandelonitrile, which contains cyanide2. Ultimately, it is this key component, cyanide, that the systematic review at hand dwells significantly upon. This is due to the fact that there is a considerable risk of serious adverse effects from cyanide poisoning2 deeming laetrile dangerous. This toxicity that is referred to in the review would affect both clinical practice and patients, as its use would be minimised in a clinical environment for the sake of patient safety. Moreover, the review also shows that there is no evidence for laetrile’s efficacy2. Fundamentally, this systematic review has effectively assessed the alleged anti-cancer effect and po...

... middle of paper ...

...tudents when they are with patients, there are two main points: Firstly, on the basis of this evidence-based review, clinicians should recommend to cancer patients that laetrile is not the most appropriate drug to be taken due to the mentioned significant side effect. Secondly, the review’s claims that countries such as Mexico are still promoting laetrile and that websites have again started promoting and selling laetrile, amygdalin and apricot pits8 are significant for other medical students to know, as they are indicative of the notion of patient values. More specifically, the fact that there are some people still promoting the use of laetrile could possibly reflect their cultural/personal beliefs, both of which should be respected by any medical student or practitioner as cultural safety and patient-centred care are of extreme importance in any clinical practice.

More about Laetrile Essay

Open Document