Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities and differences of mexican and french revolution
Similarities and differences of mexican and french revolution
Overview of the Mexican Revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The French Revolution that occurred between 1789 and 1799 and the disruptions it caused throughout Europe helped to facilitate the Mexican War of Independence which began in 1810 and continued through the early nineteenth century. These two revolutions had similar leadership and similar events due to the interaction with the five stages of revolution, but the two countries experienced wildly different outcomes from this conflict.
France and Mexico both had similar leadership on both sides of their revolutions. The catholic church, still a powerful European institution of the time, backed both their monarchs King Louis #? and King Ferdinand #?, respectively, and these two rulers were each most interested in ending the revolts, so their absolutist policies would not be disturbed. One of Mexico’s earliest and most influential revolutionary leaders was Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla. Similarly, Maximilien Robespierre was one of the original revolutionists and a key player in France. While both of these men were motivated by their belief in popular sovereignty, Costilla was a priest with many religious motivations as well. On the other hand, Robespierre was strongly influenced by the beliefs and practices associated with enlightenment, a rising intellectual current in Europe during that era. The Five Stages of Revolution can be applied to the conflict in both of these countries. Stage Five, the Thermidorian Reaction, consists of the new regime taking on the “robes” of the old. In France, many historians consider Napoleon to be the Thermidorian Reaction while Whatshisname Iturbide can be seen as the Thermidorian Reaction in the Mexican War of Independence. These two leaders were each viewed as epitomes of change and progress by their peo...
... middle of paper ...
...hy with a National Assembly, to a corrupt government controlled by a National Convention, to an even more corrupt oligarchy style government controlled by the Directory, to a military based authoritarian government under Napoleon. After the fall of Napoleon, France was once again a monarchy for around a 100 years, but the power of the French Crown was significantly weakened by the ethics and the ideas of popular sovereignty and enlightenment that the revolution had spread. Mexico reached its desired outcome while France returned back to where they began after innumerable damage.
The French Revolution and the Mexican War of Independence both occurred around the same time, an era marked by revolutionary and novel thinking. They saw similar leadership and event due to model such as the Five Stages of Revolution, but the outcomes of the two revolutions differed greatly.
To understand both conflicts one must first understand that revolution is not a single event. It is instead a process. The goal of revolution is the redistribution of wealth and economic power. In both cases the battle waged in both wars were waged for these reasons and in both cases the seeds for these revolutions had been planted long before the conflicts themselves.
This can be connected to the Mexican American War because they both have create the divide between the two countries. In the Mexican American War, because of America’s belief in Manifest Destiny, the Americans believed that they had the right to conquer their land from sea to sea. This would divide the two countries because Mexico did not want to give up the land, but because of American’s drive to push onward, a war broke out. This is similar to the Civil War because the people were driven apart because the North believed that the slavery should be abolished, but the south thought
Analyzing the post-revolutionary governments of America and France will prove that the French Revolution was far more revolutionary than the American Revolution, due to the radical change that took place, the type of government implemented after, as well as the Napoleonic Code brought forth by Napoleon Bonaparte.
The French Revolution and the English Civil War were arguably two of the biggest events in English and French history. The English Civil War spanned from 1642 to 1651, while the French Revolution occurred from 1789 to 1799. During these times monarchies were running on thin ice as the people began to lose faith in their rulers. The monarchies lack of social reliance was a cause of both of these events to occur. Both of these events occurred due to multiple political and economic problems in each of their time periods.
One of the main causes for the revolution and essentially what started it was the inefficiency of both governments and the oppression they placed upon their nations. There is a strong similarity of how and what each government did to abuse their powers. Both governments lead their country into a bad state by forcing the peoples to fight for a cause that did not involve the, but was instead the major authorities problem. The French were driven into war to help America's revolution while the Americans were always forced to fighting Britain's battles, all of which suppressed the growth of their nation.
Both the French and Russian revolutions occurred because of two main reasons. Both of these revolutions were the direct results of bad leadership and a bad economy. These two reasons along with other factors caused both of these revolutions. Although they were both similar, they also had differences. A difference between the two is that the Russians had an unsuccessful "pre-revolution" in 1905. Another difference between these two revolutions is the fact that the French turned towards a democracy while the Russian government became communist.
These two revolutions occurred relatively at same period, but were almost complete mirror reflections of one another. The patriots of the revolution in America did not really even wanted a revolution, but had no choice, which made it peaceful aside from the war. The revolutionists in France seemed almost bloodthirsty and were very quick to kill someone for any injustice. The groups of revolutionists were too radical in that they were not willing to compromise. Compromise makes the difference between a peaceful state and a reign of terror.
The American and French Revolutions took place between 1775 and 1789. Though they were closely related chronologically, the two revolutions were interrelated in several other important ways than just time itself.
A revolution occurs when a need for drastic change is necessary to alter ones way of living. The change they are fighting for would end up to be a positive impact once victory prevails, but of course with every battle there are disagreements and violent quarrels. Revolution may seem to be a negative connotation, but there are always two sides to every story. Just like many other countries around the world a Latin American country called Mexico went through a revolution of their own. Although the Mexican Revolution was mainly fought for the distribution of land, it opened a gateway for the women. One of their main issues during the Mexican revolution dealt with women and their struggled determination for equality. Having many roles in society with restrictions placed upon them, an urge for mobilization, and a wonderfully strong woman role model named Hermila Galindo, it gave them all a reason for the extra push they needed for the change they wanted for the future. Being able to finally put their voice in action the women of Mexico fought proudly for what they believed was right.
The French Revolution happened in France around the period 1789-92 (although these dates are disputed by historians), and resulted in the overthrow of the French monarchy and the Ancien Régime (the system of government). The monarchy in France had been established for many centuries, and the causes of the Revolution were deeply-rooted, including the problems with the Ancien Régime, the growth of nationalism, the influence of philosophers, and the example of the American Revolution. In the short term, there were other factors that precipitated the French Revolution, and these included the character of Louis XVI (the reigning French monarch at the time), the Bankruptcy of the French Crown, and, in the very short term, the economic and agricultural problems of 1788 and 1789.
The enlightment era was a time of change, many scientific and technological discoveries were coming about all over Europe, and many people started questioning the monarchies and their ways. They changed their traditional views and ideas on religion, politics, humanity, science, philosophy, and believed that humans had the capacity of improving. The enlightment era’s ideas of change backed by the poverty and oppression suffered by the people ignited the independence movement at places such as the British colonies in North America in 1776, and right after, the French people also got tired of the inequality and the crown’s excesses at the peoples expenses and in 1789 the French revolution which ended with the beheading of the French royalty erupted. Slowly the changes of ideas and power taking place over the world started coming into México and onto the hands of criollos and upper class mestizos who wanted the rights denied to them by the Spaniards and were thirsty for
The American Revolution and French Revolution were two long lasting uprisings that had great value to those battling for their rights and want they wanted to change. Yet there are a few distinctions details set them apart in a small way. The Americans wanted a change in their government, but the French wanted a huge change in everything including their government, religion, social structure (whereas American’s social system stayed the same) and economy. Other than the few differences they had, they two Revolutions were much alike, basically twin revolutions.
During the 1800s there were many revolutions that caused fighting and disagreement in Europe and Latin America. Many brave countries stood up to the mother country to fight the vicious battle for independence. One of the many countries fighting for independence was Haiti. Haiti was trying to get independence from France. In 1804 Saint Domingue declared their independence and named the new nation. Another country fighting for the battle of independence was Mexico. Mexico fought hard with Spain to gain their independence. There was a dispute between the mexicans because some did not want to fight against Spain and just stay a part of their nation and government. Miguel Hidalgo made the first public call for Mexican Independence in 1821. In document 5 there is a painting and all the people of Mexico are taking part in the movement for independence no matter what color they are. The people are taking pride in their country and beliefs by holding up signs and following Father Miguel Hidalgo.
Now, even though they started out similarly, they also did have some differences from each other. The American Revolution was the first significant revolution of the century, and it was also the first to be successful. The main reason it was successful was that it did not start out being “rebellious” in nature, but rather conservative. In another words, it was not a rebellion against the Government, but rather against having too much government controlling them. (American Revolution) The French revolution was a true rebellion against the King and the government in general. The French were the ones on the offensive, fighting to gain new freedom starting with the Storming of the Bastille. (French Revolution)
... Soon, King Louis XV had bankrupted the national treasury of France and had left the country in debt. By this time, the monarchs were being frowned upon, so when France was passed onto Louis XVI, people judged him quickly and deemed him a bad king who did not know how to deal with the country’s affairs. The people of France were tired of having kings who repeatedly ignored their problems and needs and were turning against the idea of absolutism, making it one cause of the French Revolution.