Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
impact of leadership in an organization
visionary leadership characteristics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: impact of leadership in an organization
Organizational Leadership Module 3
Leadership Practice Inventory Leadership Practice Inventory (LPI) is an assessment on leadership behaviors and activities. During the analysis, it covers five behaviors; challenging the process, inspiring a shared vision, enabling others to act, modeling the way, encouraging the heart. I first conducted the LPI assessment on myself, to analyze my own leadership strength and weakness. If on the LPI behavior I scored high then I am doing well, if I scored low then I need more practice. The outcome of the LPI for the behavior of challenging the process I scored low. Then on inspiring a shared vision, I scored high. On enabling others to act I scored high. Modeling the way I scored low and encouraging the heart, I scored high. Therefore my strengths of leadership are inspiring a shared vision and encouraging the heart. My weaknesses are challenging the process and modeling the way; however for my enabling other to act I was moderate. I chose four different people to take the LPI about me. The first a family member, I received a high score on challenging the process, inspiring a shared vision, enabling others to act, modeling the way, encouraging the heart. According to my father, I have no weaknesses, but there is always room for improvement. The second person was a
…show more content…
I do lack time management. I have acknowledged that I do better when my time managing and organization is in order. I have also found that I dedicate all of my time and energy for other people and leaving no time for myself. I love self-help books, but have no time to read them. I often distance myself, from my family, and friends, because I have no time. People have called me cynical, and by observing my LPI score from others who surveyed my leadership, I agree. I feel that I am cynical because I am unhappy. How can I become a better leader when my optimistic performance and energy is
Denisco & Barker, (2016) discusses the foundation of leadership and the four conceptual pillars that comprise it. Understanding the leadership is a responsibility of an APN, the following final question was posed to Ms. Gordner. “Of the four pillars of leadership; professionalism, inspirational motivation, interpersonal relationships, and business skills, do you feel that one is more important than another, and why?” She responded,
A person’s title within the organization does not make them a leader. The driving factor which determines if someone is in a leader position is their behavior. This person who is a leader will guide those in the organization by influencing, guiding, giving direction, and opinions (Marquis & Huston, 2012). The culture as well as the climate of an organization begins with the leadership (Azaare & Gross, 2011). Each individual person has their own leadership style. Knowing one’s own leadership style will help them understand themselves and be able to grow as a leader. The purpose of this paper is to look at my own leadership style, including my strengths for leading others. A description of a potential challenge that I foresee due to my leadership style and a plan for my personal leadership development will be discussed.
“The study of leadership rivals in age the emergence of civilization, which shaped its leaders as much as it was shaped by them. From its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders- what they did and why they did it.”
As stated above, the LPI offered a unique opportunity to examine how I recognized myself as a supervisor and mentor. As a leader this survey glanced into how I saw myself; modeling the way, inspiring a shared vision, challenging the process, enabling others to act, and encouraging the heart. Equally important, it gave my supervisors, peers, and subordinates the same opportunity to give feedback from their perspective. A phrase often heard is, “You are your toughest critic”. This LPI survey validated that statement by showing me the differences in the scores of the aforementioned categories. Results from my survey revealed I
The breakdown was as follows, in the area of self-awareness, the score was a 19, in the area of internalized moral perspective, the score was a 19, in the area of balanced processing, the score was a 14 and in the area of relational transparency, the score was a 15. The total scores received reflected high self-awareness and internalized moral prospective and low balanced processing and relational transparency (Northouse, 2013). The higher scores were indicative of me being a strongly authentic, whereas, the lower scores showed that there was some weakness in authentic leadership (Northouse,
I think these assessments have been helpful in clarifying my leadership style. I am confident in how I look at challenges and researching solutions. I seek several solutions and points of view. I look for a win-win outcome whenever possible. I can hard line something when I have to, but I prefer to create the most positive outcome.
I was not significantly surprised at my results of the Personal Inventory Assessment (PIA). My personal results indicated that I have a healthy balance of patience, competitiveness, and engagement when it comes to measuring my personality (Personal Inventory Assessments, 2016). Over the course of my career I have developed my leadership skills, along with my level of self-awareness, to understand the need to approach my work as a collaborative effort and not a self-fulfilling journey. My decision making preference rated highest as a participatory style (Personal Inventory Assessments, 2016). I do believe that there are many times when a decision needs to be group based and not individual given the impact that the decision may have on the group as a whole. I can
What evidence is there in multidisciplinary cancer care, of a relationship between the role of oncologist and leadership outcomes?
It is the second online assessment version created by Don Clifton, the chairman and CEO of the company (Gallup,2016). StrengthsFinder is an instrument or tool that help an individual discover his/her leadership strength . It also gives advise and insight on how to improve, develop one person’s strengths to be an effective leader to his followers. It is a personality test made up of 177 stimuli that the respondent need to answer. At the end, answers were evaluated and put into 34 themes and this theme will be classified into four primary leadership domains of strengths (Executing, Influencing, Relationship Building and Strategic Thinking)( Asplund, J. et. al. , 2007). It will show the individual’s top 5 talents or themes and what domain it belongs. Aside from providing the top 5 personal strength, it also gives advice on how to nurture, enhance, develop and maximize these talents to help you to be a better person and an effective leader. With regards to its reliability, StrengthsFinder is very consistent which makes it very reliable. Based on information provided in the technical report, the test and retest reliability showed almost the same result of percentage in all 34 themes (Asplund J. et. al , 2007 p.11). The internal consistency of StrengthsFinder has also similar result in all 34 themes. This makes it very reliable. The validity of the StrengthsFinder 2.0 is very strong. Based on categories used in measuring the validity of the test the outcome was very strong . Clifton and his researchers has 30 years history of studying behavior and traits of over 2 million of subjects that they conduct in several places (Asplund, J. et. al. 2007 p.15). The construct validity was also strong for this instrument. There was only less than 2% of the theme or talent pairs failed to meet the 70% criterion which makes it overall very positive result (Strengths, 2007 p. 18). Using
It is very common in this day and age to become discontent with where you are at in leadership. One of the reasons for this discontentment can be because influencing all of those around us is not an easy thing to do. If we are to not only stay content, but also excel in leadership we must keep in mind that ninety-nine percent of leadership does not come from the top of any given organization, but the middle. John C. Maxwell, author of The 360-Degree Leader, speaks to us about the principles that leaders can use to bring value and influence to any organization from any level within the organization, enabling them to do, what John C. Maxwell describes as leading up, leading across, and leading down.
Many individuals and organizations, uses these tools to evaluate leadership abilities. It is almost similar to a SWOT analysis, which measures strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and treats. I find the LCSI extremely effective because it assesses leadership competencies in five major areas: personal, analytical, communication, organizational and positional competencies. Then, it further operationalizes the five important skills into core qualities that exceptional leaders own. After completing my scorecard, I was able to do my SWOT analysis. It assisted me to identify my strong and weak areas. In this pape...
The outcomes of the two assessments along with my own self-awareness give me plenty to think about. How can I better use my strengths to become a more effective leader, and what can I do to ensure that I am working on my shortcomings to continue
When considering the term management, there has always been a common miss conception that this automatically makes an individual a leader. Leadership is only a single element of the management role. Many times managers are more comfortable utilizing a particular leadership style. While this may work well the majority of the time, certain employees or situations may require a different approach. Good leadership requires that the individual recognize the need for change to motivate their employees to accomplish the task at hand or to reach common goals. Understanding the importance of leadership is essential. However, the key element to focus on is what steps can be taken to improve one’s leadership capabilities. For many individuals this may be a difficult question to answer and may only be possible through self-assessment and reflection.
After the self-assessment, now I feel confident about my qualities and how I need to deal with people with different personality having very differently thinking and how we can come to a common solution of any problem.
Well I guess I’ll start off this paper by being outright honest. I have never done this type of self-assessment exercise. So I’ll start this paper off with what exactly this type of self-assessment is. These types of self-assessments are meant to help show the individual (me) where my strengths lie and also where my weaknesses are as well so that I may try and lean on my strengths while improving on my own shortcomings. Essentially the Johari Window four regions model that we learned about is a great tool for this assessment. The first region is also known as the open area, which essentially means that this is what is known by the person about him/herself and is also know by others. The second region is known as the blind area in which this is information unknown by the individual but is known by others. Which could be behaviors that an individual does but does not realize that they are doing them. The third window is known as the hidden area. This area is essentially information that only you know about yourself and others do not. The fourth area is known as the unknown area. It’s known as that because this is information that you and others do not know about you. It’s when you take a look at these four areas and see your strengths and/or weaknesses are at and if you allow yourself to become open to feedback you then can improve on your own shortcomings and become a better leader.