Kurosawa Oath Of Blood Comparison

519 Words2 Pages

After viewing Akira Kurosawa’s 1957 film, Throne of Blood, one would find it best to describe the work as a successful transcription of Shakespeare’s Macbeth. The term transcription here is used while maintaining the biological denotative sense—the process where information is copied from one entity, and used as the basis for the fruition of an entirely new entity bearing the familiar inherent insignia of its predecessor. Kurosawa, while adjusting the events that occur in the original, has taken Shakespeare’s Macbeth and more than successfully produced an adaptation rich in Japanese aesthetic, history, and devices used in the Japanese style of storytelling. Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood, arguably, creates a more poignant interpretation regarding themes of destiny vs. rampant individual ambition. …show more content…

Variations of sound and its antithesis silence, in various instances, were the only theatrical devices being employed in the scene. Aesthetically, the implementation of Japanese Noh tradition bolstered the film’s authenticity. With regards to Asaji, Lady Macbeth’s equivalent in Throne of Blood, her performance is highly contained. Her tight-lipped demeanor and minute physicality accentuates her leeriness. Asaji is an active paradox. Her eremitic demeanor separates her physically from Washizu, but is also the mechanism that allows her to act as his ‘conscious guide’. She becomes an active extension of Washizu but is physically isolated interaction wise. In Shakespeare productions, or productions outside of Noh tradition, audience members would see an array of highly physical tactics employed by Lady Macbeth in order for her to persuade Macbeth. Here, Kurosawa juxtaposes our accepted belief in the power of physical prowess with the power of psychological

Open Document