Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is constitute knowledge
What is constitute knowledge
What is constitute knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is constitute knowledge
Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) define knowledge as "beliefs and commitment (function of a particular stance, perspective or intention), action (to some end) and meaning (context specific and relational)." Whereas, Davenport and Probst (2000) refer knowledge as "the whole body of cognition's and skills that person uses to solve problems and based on data and information, it is always bound to persons." Knowledge is valuable intellectual asset to a firm captured by individual (Ahn and Chang, 2002; Sathasivam et al., 2009) and it is one of the most crucial resources in the economy to improve business operation, increase productivity and profitability and hence, sustain in the competitive market. This research defined knowledge as an individual asset in the form of intellectual asset such as opinion, beliefs, attitude or skill that can be interpreted and used for achieving objectives or goal. This individual knowledge is a precondition for firm knowledge (Meyer and Sugiyama, 2007) which results from the consolidation of employees in the firm through communication.
Bhatt (2002) contends that individual knowledge and firm knowledge are different but interrelated. Both knowledge interacts with each other depends on the firm culture. Furthermore, the author also highlights the key element for firm knowledge is “interactions” among firm members. Firm knowledge is the collective knowledge from the interaction of individual in creating unique idea to complete specific task (Tsoukas & Vladmirou, 2001). Knowledge is kept with individual if interaction among firm members is limited; in fact most of knowledge is internalized within the firm through informal talk, discussion or interaction (Bhatt, 2002). This interaction enhances both par...
... middle of paper ...
...its include increase firm’s performance in terms of productivity, incremental innovation and dynamic capacity through efficiency of knowledge search, absorption and combination (Katila & Ahuja, 2002; March, 1991; McGrath, 2001). However it will incur more costs and high risk (Kang & Snell, 2007; Tinoco, 2007). Furthermore, too much explorative learning may give higher benefits (Levinthal & March, 1993) but will usually block a firm from achieving the actual return from its knowledge. As a result of continuous exploratory learning, less utilizing the firm stocks may lead a firm to run with inefficiencies (Kang & Snell, 2007). As such balance of both exploratory and exploitative learning is crucial to maintain firm’s current capacity (Chang & Hughes, 2012; Filippini et al., 2012; Hsu, Lien, & Chen, 2013; J. Lee & Bae, 2012; Raeth et al., 2012; Wang & Rafiq, 2009)
The free dictionary online defines knowledge as “an awareness, consciousness, or familiarity gained by experience or learning”. Power, on the other hand, means “the ability or official capacity of a person, group or nation to exercise great influence or control and authority over others”. In Voltaire’s “Candide”, Goethe’s “Faust”, and Shelley’s Frankenstein, the quest for more knowledge and power sets the stage for the story yet the characters, Candide, Frankenstein, and Faust remain unhappy after acquiring the much desired knowledge and power. It can be said, therefore, that knowledge, and even money, often times twists and corrupts the mind because of the control (power) it gives people over others.
Knowledge work according to Raman, (1999), contains activities, which are "information-based, knowledge intensive and knowledge generating" (p. 2). The paper's theme is, "organizations staying ahead of the competition have come to realize knowledge and knowledge workers are their key to success in today's environment where knowledge and information have become commodities" (Raman, 1999, p. 1). This paper's theme traces the historical development of knowledge management and knowledge workers; differentiates between knowledge workers and non-knowledge workers, and illustrate the knowledge workers experience in the author's organization. Knowledge systems contain the potential to increase business value (Bang, Cleemann, & Bramming, 2010).
As we know that a company’s culture, particularly during its early years, is greatly a reflection of the personality, background, and values of its founder or founders, as well as their vision for the future of the organization. When entrepreneurs establish their own businesses, the way they want to do business determines the Organization’s rules, the structure, and performance evaluation in the company and the people they hire to work with them. This is very much evident in the case o...
...s and partly, to gain a competitive advantages in the global market. Thus, the company spends billions of dollars in innovative research activities to add new knowledge into the existing knowledge.
Learning organizations for their nature must invest so much in new projects to acquire knowledge. I think that these are the riskiest yet revolutionary companies in the market. They are very risky because new projects need a lot of money to be sustained, and no one knows if the project will succeed or not. They are the most revolutionary too because the most significant inventions or the greatest products always need a little bit of madness and faith to be conceived. The most notable benefits of these companies are the capacity to adapt to the changing environment and the high potential they have.
‘Don’t give me any more facts! I need to make a decision right now!’ Although one can question knowledge endlessly, one cannot forever suspend judgment while researching and reflecting. What would it mean to act responsibly in a situation where one cannot possess certainty? How would one justify the decision?
T.D. Wilson (2002) makes a point of identifying several sources of articles, references and course syllabi with varying takes on knowledge management within organizations. Wilson is convinced that organizations misuse the terminology “knowledge management” and that their activities are more concerned with managing information than with the management of knowledge (Wilson, 2002). Wilson defines knowledge as involving “the mental processes of comprehension” or, as “what we know” and information as the expression of what we know and can convey through messages (Wilson, 2002). By researching the use of the “knowledge management” Wilson conveys that the terms knowledge and information are used interchangeably, which results in an inaccurate application
Methods The article is divided largely in four major sections. The introduction lays out different basic concepts used in knowledge management (KM) for our better understanding of the topic. Then, the author continues on by touching upon various factors and steps involved in decision making processes. The first section delves into sources of knowledge and the second section explains incorporation of the different sets of knowledge at different steps of decision making processes. Thirdly, the integration of all the factors above is emphasized. All the key components together bring forth 4 different dimensions. Having access to knowledge whether it’s bas...
(q), his belief that he sees a barn, isn’t justified, though. Therefore, Dom cannot know (q). The internalism of my account is obvious. What’s required for justification of (q) is different for Henry and Dom because of each’s belief about the kind of environment he is in. It is the belief about the environment and not the environment that matters. In other words, two people could be in the exact same circumstances but what required for justification would be different because of the beliefs they have. Causal accounts of knowledge can’t account for why Henry is justified for (q), but Dom is not. My account is not a causal account; as is shown in the Dom variation above, my account has no problem accounting for the different justifications required for Dom and for Henry.
...bjectives and realize growth. Knowledge Management Knowledge management plays a key role in ensuring that the different functions and activities of a company are synchronized. In Google’s case, the purchase of Motorola (which has turned out not to have been the best business decision) probably could have been avoided if the knowledge within the company was managed and used better. Knowledge enables a company to create, recognize and distribute opportunities. When every employee of a company contributes his or her part of knowledge into the knowledge pool, it is very beneficial as it contributes to the overall success of the company. Proper application of the available knowledge in a company can offer several competitive benefits to both the company and the employees. Application of accurate knowledge at the correct situation helps a company to make good decisions.
One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence “strong” enough and how can this limit be established?
Hansen M., Nohria N., and Tierney T. (1999), “What’s your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?,” Harvard Business Review (March 1999), 106–16.
Knowledge consists of behavioral attitudes, and those experiences and skills that are developed in individuals that cause them to be consistent and effective when performing functions in the workplace (Seidman. W & ...
...989 'Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D'. Economic Journal 99: 569-590. Cooper, Robert B., and Robert W. Smud, 1990 'Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation'. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152. 1990 'Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach'. Management Science 36/2: 123-139. Corsini, Raymond J., 1987 Concise encyclopedia of psychology. New York: Wiley. Crossan, Mary M., Henry W. Lane, and Roderick E. White, 1999 'An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution'. Academy of Management Review 24/3: 522-537. Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March, 1963 A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall. Daft, Richard L., and Karl E. Weick, 1984 'Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems'. Academy of Management Review 9: 284-295.
When I think about knowledge the first thing that comes to my mind is education. I believe that knowledge comes to people by their experiences in life. In other words, life is an instrument that leads me to gain knowledge. Many people consider that old people are wise because they have learned from good and bad experiences throughout their lives. Education requires work, dedication and faith to gain knowledge. We acquired knowledge through the guidance of from parents, role models, college/University teachers and life experiences.